Who here can handicap 100+ college bball games for every Sat?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • fearless
    Restricted User
    • 08-14-06
    • 4950

    #1
    Who here can handicap 100+ college bball games for every Sat?
    Does anyone actually handicap every game? If so, how. If there's 100 games on a Saturday, that's at least 1200+ possible wagers (favorite, dog, over, under, + all of those wagers for the first and second half and props).

    It's mind boggling. Who can do it?
  • pico
    BARRELED IN @ SBR!
    • 04-05-07
    • 27321

    #2
    diogee
    Comment
    • bigboydan
      SBR Aristocracy
      • 08-10-05
      • 55420

      #3
      I have complete confidence that Diogee can sir.
      Comment
      • bigboydan
        SBR Aristocracy
        • 08-10-05
        • 55420

        #4
        Originally posted by pico
        diogee
        Stereo
        Comment
        • RogueJuror
          SBR Posting Legend
          • 07-08-08
          • 10010

          #5
          pags, chuck norris and fishhead

          Comment
          • InTheHole
            SBR Posting Legend
            • 04-28-08
            • 15243

            #6
            I have software that gives me alerts to games...then I once over all selections to see if anything stands out and then work with a 40 to 50 game slate eventually narrowing it down to 10-15. I don't touch O/U's and rarely 1h/2h
            Comment
            • diogee
              SBR Posting Legend
              • 01-11-08
              • 19477

              #7
              I play pretty much all totals but don't handicap every game...some I play based on my handicapping...some based on line movement compared to betting % etc. Would take way too much time to go in depth with each game without an excell sheet or program that does stuff automatically.
              Comment
              • fearless
                Restricted User
                • 08-14-06
                • 4950

                #8
                Originally posted by diogee
                I play pretty much all totals but don't handicap every game...some I play based on my handicapping...some based on line movement compared to betting % etc. Would take way too much time to go in depth with each game without an excell sheet or program that does stuff automatically.
                I'm impressed, it's mind-boggling what you're doing.
                Comment
                • diogee
                  SBR Posting Legend
                  • 01-11-08
                  • 19477

                  #9
                  Originally posted by fearless
                  I'm impressed, it's mind-boggling what you're doing.
                  Trying out a bunch of things since I am off of work for the winter. Definitely not practical to have this many wagers every day.
                  Comment
                  • fearless
                    Restricted User
                    • 08-14-06
                    • 4950

                    #10
                    Originally posted by diogee
                    Trying out a bunch of things since I am off of work for the winter. Definitely not practical to have this many wagers every day.
                    Did you make a play on the USC/Washington over/under yesterday? What did you take? What did you think about the game?
                    Comment
                    • diogee
                      SBR Posting Legend
                      • 01-11-08
                      • 19477

                      #11
                      Originally posted by fearless
                      Did you make a play on the USC/Washington over/under yesterday? What did you take? What did you think about the game?
                      Yeah I took under 136. Both teams are defensive minded and run the shot clock a bit more. 1 out of the last 3 between the teams went over that total and both teams shot 50% in that game...players change but certain teams still have the same philosophy and play the same style against each other. I don't fade a lot of line moves of 2.5+ but 72% were on the over and after looking over everything under looked better. Looked great in the 1h but garbage time really messed it up and made it look like a terrible bet. I think there was around 30 pts scored in the final 2 minutes. Better to have under in a close game.
                      Comment
                      • fearless
                        Restricted User
                        • 08-14-06
                        • 4950

                        #12
                        Originally posted by diogee
                        Yeah I took under 136. Both teams are defensive minded and run the shot clock a bit more. 1 out of the last 3 between the teams went over that total and both teams shot 50% in that game...players change but certain teams still have the same philosophy and play the same style against each other. I don't fade a lot of line moves of 2.5+ but 72% were on the over and after looking over everything under looked better. Looked great in the 1h but garbage time really messed it up and made it look like a terrible bet. I think there was around 30 pts scored in the final 2 minutes. Better to have under in a close game.
                        I took the over and I thought the over looked easy. I knew nothing about the teams except for the stats and this Washington team has been scoring in the 80s every game recently and I figured that USC would stay close and that's how it worked out. I'm sorry you lost diogee. I needed that win desperately to advance in the tournament though. Good luck tomorrow.
                        Comment
                        • diogee
                          SBR Posting Legend
                          • 01-11-08
                          • 19477

                          #13
                          Good call fearless...just 1 game to me. At the end of games is where I struggle...I' don't know what teams will continuously foul down 15 or 20 in the final couple of minutes...amazing how many unders with 20 or 30 pt cushions with 2 minutes to go lose...1 of the reasons I am looking towards 1h for unders and full game for overs.
                          Comment
                          • fearless
                            Restricted User
                            • 08-14-06
                            • 4950

                            #14
                            Originally posted by diogee
                            Good call fearless...just 1 game to me. At the end of games is where I struggle...I' don't know what teams will continuously foul down 15 or 20 in the final couple of minutes...amazing how many unders with 20 or 30 pt cushions with 2 minutes to go lose...1 of the reasons I am looking towards 1h for unders and full game for overs.
                            Yeah, first half unders sound like the way to go.
                            Comment
                            Search
                            Collapse
                            SBR Contests
                            Collapse
                            Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                            Collapse
                            Working...