The guy used to considered the Red Sox next closer
Red Sox Fans what happened to Daniel Bard?
Collapse
X
-
Big BearSBR Aristocracy
- 11-01-11
- 43253
#1Red Sox Fans what happened to Daniel Bard?Tags: None -
Big BearSBR Aristocracy
- 11-01-11
- 43253
#2He was also one of the top set up men in the league... a former 1st round pick...
is it safe to say he is a Bust?Comment -
jocoSBR MVP
- 04-24-11
- 3242
#3no i wouldnt call him a bust just yet...he is either in AA or AAA this season...dunno why they havnt called him up again especially considering most of their relievers being injured. if he hasnt done anything in another year, two at most...hes 100% a bustComment -
Big BearSBR Aristocracy
- 11-01-11
- 43253
#4
did something happen after that Blue Jays game last season? did he go bezerk in the clubhouse?Comment -
bobby heenanSBR MVP
- 03-20-09
- 4120
#5when the sox drafted him he was a starter....they signed him and worked him as a starter...he had issues...they successfully converted him to a reliever....and he was doing great things....guy could hit 99 and it looked effortless......then....out of pure greed(probably on both sides because the sox wanted to believe they could turn him into a dominate starter and bard wanted a big fat starter contract) they moved him back to a starter where it didnt work.....the guy had to tone down his fastball a bit in an effort to go deeper into games...not to say that a guy cant be effective throwing 95-96....but it took away what made him so dominate as a reliever.....i believe hes on the DL...or was....i think the sox were giving him a break to try to get his head right....dude was having ankiel/wholers like meltdownsComment -
Big BearSBR Aristocracy
- 11-01-11
- 43253
#6when the sox drafted him he was a starter....they signed him and worked him as a starter...he had issues...they successfully converted him to a reliever....and he was doing great things....guy could hit 99 and it looked effortless......then....out of pure greed(probably on both sides because the sox wanted to believe they could turn him into a dominate starter and bard wanted a big fat starter contract) they moved him back to a starter where it didnt work.....the guy had to tone down his fastball a bit in an effort to go deeper into games...not to say that a guy cant be effective throwing 95-96....but it took away what made him so dominate as a reliever.....i believe hes on the DL...or was....i think the sox were giving him a break to try to get his head right....dude was having ankiel/wholers like meltdowns
Btw i agree Bard never really had a good 3rd pitch and he was not able to throw his slider for a strike without hanging it.
Its amazing what 2-3 mph can do for your fastballComment -
bobby heenanSBR MVP
- 03-20-09
- 4120
#7when you say meltdowns do you mean poor performance on the field or do you mean crazy antics off the field?
Btw i agree Bard never really had a good 3rd pitch and he was not able to throw his slider for a strike without hanging it.
Its amazing what 2-3 mph can do for your fastballComment -
70kgmanSBR MVP
- 01-31-10
- 4354
#8Guy can't throw a strike to save his life anymore. Has an ERA around 7 and 2.37 WHIP in AA this year, averages almost 2 walks per inning.Comment -
antifoilSBR MVP
- 11-11-09
- 3993
#10the potential of gaining a starter is greater than losing a reliever.
same thing with chris sale, who worked out and neftali feliz, who had to have TJ.Comment -
70kgmanSBR MVP
- 01-31-10
- 4354
#11The Bard as a starter experiment is long over. Lasted 10 starts and that is it. He has been back in the minors the past couple years as a reliever, not working on being a starter.Comment -
antifoilSBR MVP
- 11-11-09
- 3993
#12i am saying even if he never pitches in the majors again the risk was worth it.Comment -
bobby heenanSBR MVP
- 03-20-09
- 4120
#13was it? the sox rotation isnt terrible right now and would be even better if clay could stay in one piece(which seems impossible).....not that the sox gave up alot...but they had to deal for bailey and hanrahan.....they had their closer staring them right in the face.....and they had successfully converted him from a starter with issues to a dominate reliever....Comment -
antifoilSBR MVP
- 11-11-09
- 3993
#14yeah a starter gives you 3 times the innings than a reliever. good clubs don't overpay for relievers. even bard as a average starter is better than him as top 15 reliever. you get way more value out of him as a player.
the red sox got fleeced by the astros by trading jed lowrie for melancon then in typical red sox fashion over reacted to a bad start to the season by him. then they sold him cheap getting an overpaid player in hanrahan for melancon and 3 other players. their front office got tricked by the "proven" closer fallacy, and now have two overpaid relievers.
i mean the pirates just put a 36 year old guy in the closer role that has no one had heard of before the season. they should try to scam the red sox again for him.Comment -
bobby heenanSBR MVP
- 03-20-09
- 4120
#15yeah a starter gives you 3 times the innings than a reliever. good clubs don't overpay for relievers. even bard as a average starter is better than him as top 15 reliever. you get way more value out of him as a player.
the red sox got fleeced by the astros by trading jed lowrie for melancon then in typical red sox fashion over reacted to a bad start to the season by him. then they sold him cheap getting an overpaid player in hanrahan for melancon and 3 other players. their front office got tricked by the "proven" closer fallacy, and now have two overpaid relievers.
i mean the pirates just put a 36 year old guy in the closer role that has no one had heard of before the season. they should try to scam the red sox again for him.Comment -
antifoilSBR MVP
- 11-11-09
- 3993
#16yeah that is how the yankees screwed up joba.
we don't know what the scouts and GM talked about with this move. if they are any kind of advanced front office, they put percentage chances on the outcomes then wade their options. i am sure they talked to the player and generally gathered enough data we have no clue about, so even if it didn't work out doesn't mean it wasn't the right decision.
to say it was a bad decision, you would need to have insight in to the methodology the club used rather than the result.Comment -
bobby heenanSBR MVP
- 03-20-09
- 4120
#17yeah that is how the yankees screwed up joba.
we don't know what the scouts and GM talked about with this move. if they are any kind of advanced front office, they put percentage chances on the outcomes then wade their options. i am sure they talked to the player and generally gathered enough data we have no clue about, so even if it didn't work out doesn't mean it wasn't the right decision.
to say it was a bad decision, you would need to have insight in to the methodology the club used rather than the result.Comment -
Big BearSBR Aristocracy
- 11-01-11
- 43253
#18I say bring his ass back up to the big leagues and let him start...Comment -
Big BearSBR Aristocracy
- 11-01-11
- 43253
#20The Red Sox cut Bard and he has been picked up on
waivers by the lowly Chicago Cubs...
Talk about a career that took a nose dive.Comment -
BennyBigNutsSBR Hall of Famer
- 04-16-12
- 8700
#21
Has a sick arm, possibly one of gthe livest in MLB behind chapman right now.
That was Bard when he came up.
Thought he was gonna be huge.
I still say Rosenthal becomes a great closer. But then again, I thought Bard was gonna take Papplebons spot and he never came through.Comment -
unusialsusp5SBR MVP
- 04-18-10
- 4198
#23he caught steve blass disease. go back 40 years if you don't remember or know what happened to the pirates best starter i believe after 1971 season. you cannot recover from steve blass disease.Comment
Search
Collapse
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
#1 BetMGM
4.8/5 BetMGM Bonus Code
#2 FanDuel
4.8/5 FanDuel Promo Code
#3 Caesars
4.8/5 Caesars Promo Code
#4 DraftKings
4.7/5 DraftKings Promo Code
#5 Fanatics
#6 bet365
4.7/5 bet365 Bonus Code
#7 Hard Rock
4.1/5 Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
#8 BetRivers
4.1/5 BetRivers Bonus Code