Why not just parlay each separately? Is this is same time? I don't think it pays any more either..
thanks.
Panic
SBR Posting Legend
01-06-08
10367
#2
Convenience. Easier just to round robin it than taking every possible combination and single them out and parlay them.
Comment
LT Profits
SBR Aristocracy
10-27-06
90963
#3
What Panic said. It is the exact same thing with the exact same payout. It's just easier to play multiple parlays at the same time.
Comment
Chi_archie
SBR Aristocracy
07-22-08
63172
#4
I think Bread did this...got a bunch of Robyns and had them dance in circle or somthing... this is how he found the Robyn with the roundest bottom or somthing.....
wait, is this a gambling question?
Comment
Justin7
SBR Hall of Famer
07-31-06
8577
#5
Say I have 8 plays, at nickel limits. Betting straight up, I can risk a total of 4k.
With RRs, I can bet (8 2) = 28 2-team parlays for a nickel, and another (8 3) = 56 3-teamers.
28 + 56 = 84. So instead of limits * 8, I get Parlay limits * 84... 10 times the volume. This is key if you are beating the crap out of bad numbers or weak openers.
Comment
TPowell
SBR Posting Legend
02-21-08
18842
#6
nice post Justin, makes a lot of sense but always nerveracking to have a play involved in 2 or 3 parlays/
Comment
Justin7
SBR Hall of Famer
07-31-06
8577
#7
Originally posted by TPowell
nice post Justin, makes a lot of sense but always nerveracking to have a play involved in 2 or 3 parlays/
Assume you win 54% of all your picks.
Assume you have a bankroll of 1000, versus limits of 1
Or make it 1m bank versus 1k limits (same ratio)
It's all about how much you can bet. If you win long-term, your money will grow until you cannot bet what you want.