Lakers best team on paper so why are Celtics better?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • l7ustin
    SBR MVP
    • 10-09-08
    • 3914

    #1
    Lakers best team on paper so why are Celtics better?
    I cant figure out how the Lakers lose...ever...they might be the best team on paper I have ever seen (Granted im not that old). Why are the Celtics so much better? If they played a 7 game series right now Celtics would own them again.

    Can anyone stop the Celtics from repeating? Maybe the Cavs?

    What the hell is wrong with the Lakers, does anyone think they get things straightened out for when it matters most
  • Scorpion
    SBR Hall of Famer
    • 09-04-05
    • 7797

    #2
    Originally posted by l7ustin
    I cant figure out how the Lakers lose...ever...they might be the best team on paper I have ever seen (Granted im not that old). Why are the Celtics so much better? If they played a 7 game series right now Celtics would own them again.

    Can anyone stop the Celtics from repeating? Maybe the Cavs?

    What the hell is wrong with the Lakers, does anyone think they get things straightened out for when it matters most

    SIMPLE

    If Doc was the LAL coach and that lazy old fart was the Celtics coach the LAL would win.

    Phil Jackson is the most overrated coach in the history of professional sports.

    Didnt the LAL lose to Detriot with the mountain guerilla and Kobe, a team with no spuerstars? the LAL were the better team in the series too

    LAL do not have a head coach and play no D!
    Comment
    • Tsoprano
      BARRELED IN @ SBR!
      • 04-14-08
      • 26374

      #3
      Celtics are a better team on paper.

      Lakers lack the mental toughness.
      Comment
      • AGENT97
        SBR Rookie
        • 12-21-08
        • 30

        #4
        i have to agree with t. I THINK THE CELTS ARE BETTER ON AND OFF THE PAPERWORK
        Comment
        • rm18
          SBR Posting Legend
          • 09-20-05
          • 22291

          #5
          lakers are not that good on paper, not even as talented as 99 lakers

          Celtics are better on paper to me just they are more of a defensive team
          Comment
          • l7ustin
            SBR MVP
            • 10-09-08
            • 3914

            #6
            lakers have more depth than any team i have ever seen. half their bench could start on 90% of the other nba teams
            Comment
            • ryanXL977
              SBR Posting Legend
              • 02-24-08
              • 20615

              #7
              ill take kg and pierce over any team players on any other other team any day

              kg, best player of our time
              Comment
              • Data
                SBR MVP
                • 11-27-07
                • 2236

                #8
                Originally posted by ryanXL977
                ill take kg and pierce over any team players on any other other team any day

                kg, best player of our time
                QFT

                The team depth does not win championships, only superstars do. While Kobe is fan favorite, "on paper", or as I would put it "by the stats", KG is head and shoulders above all current NBA superstars. Any team that has two superstars on its roaster is a championship contender. KG is valuable as almost two superstars. Add Pierce and then do not forget about Ray Allen and you get what you see.
                Comment
                • ZBOIZ
                  SBR Posting Legend
                  • 06-22-08
                  • 21464

                  #9
                  It's simple!!

                  The Celtics play defense and defense wins championships. Also the Celtics has way more team toughness and will than the Lakers
                  Comment
                  Search
                  Collapse
                  SBR Contests
                  Collapse
                  Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                  Collapse
                  Working...