Lakers make big statement in Indiana

[PS3]

i think it is you who does not understand... all the tandems that you mention were the best in their time..
but they all worked together...

Kobe attacks the other part of his tandem... he competes with it.
He wants two wins. He wants to score more points than Howard, and calls him out every opportunity he has.
Attempting to make Howard seem like the lesser player. Uncommitted and lazy.

this dynamic did not exist in any of the other very successful tandems you mentioned, Jordan never called out
Pippen in the media.. as Kobe calls out Howard "we don't have time for Dwight's shoulder to heal"
or "time for Pau to put his big-boy pants on"..

that's not 'tandem' behavior, that is antagonistic behavior.*

Understand basic basketball concepts before commenting...

You obviously don't know Kobe, do you?
It's his way to get into those people's head who are underperforming to step it up.
Oh ratzzie boy.

[Ratzz]

You obviously don't know Kobe, do you?
It's his way to get into those people's head who are underperforming to step it up.
Oh ratzzie boy.

wrong. that's the excuse he uses.
It is his way of continuously experience success, by creating another's failure, by alluding to it. *
a bit like winning a basketball game.

but one has to know how and when to stop. When the game ends, don't take it
the fight to your teammates.*

[PS3]

How do you know?

[Ratzz]

How do you know?

it is self-evident.
was he attacking Shaq to get him perform better, or to get rid of him?

which happened?

Shaq was already the best Center in the NBA when they played together. He had league MVPs as well as 3 Finals MVPs..
is that a person you attack?

What was Howard's emotional reaction to that? "i like playing here, i will sign an extension right away"

it was "is Kobe a doctor? will he be paying my salary next year?" or
" I don't want to talk about how many touches i get" ___ "i won't talk about this, about that"

that's a negative response to a negative stimulus. (Kobe's attack through media)

all of that is Kobe winning and Howard losing. Kobe needs to experience winning in every moment.
He can't turn it off. Creates problems for teammates.*

[TheMoneyShot]

Indiana had a bad game. You guys are all crazy

[lakerboy]

Indiana had a bad game. You guys are all crazy

No you hate the lakers. When they win the other team had a bad game. When they lose they are underachieving.

[Capnick]

Talk when you beat the heat, spurs , clippers, or thunder... STOP IT!

[lakerboy]

Heat needed double ot to beat the kings. Lakers win without kobe.

[Uprise]

kobe of the lock

[TheMoneyShot]

No you hate the lakers. When they win the other team had a bad game. When they lose they are underachieving.

I don't hate the Lakers. They aren't the easiest team to cap.

[Ratzz]

Heat needed double ot to beat the kings. Lakers win without kobe.

if Princess plays tonight vs. the Kings, the Lakers lose.no way they put up 113, with him tossing away 16-19 possessions on bad shots

[Uprise]

kobe poopoo head

[Uprise]

go pacers pacers nation #pacersnation #swagnation #gopacers #go patriots!!!!!

[Ratzz]

kobe poopoo head

that'z more like it.

[Uprise]

that'z more like it.

yeeeeeeeeeeee happy gilmore tell em soulja!

[William Walters]

and i believe that statement IS..."we are better without Kobe"

NO WAY.. they beat Indy with Kobe playing his patented 1-on-5 isolations..
and missing 16-20 shots... (like turnovers really)

great game for the Lakers...
terrible game for Kobe..

people are gonna figure out what's up.
Nash was FINALLY able to be NASH

................and you were saying????

Hey.....fukkfaced retard......care to elaborate on your these threads:

http://forum.sbrforum.com/nba-basket...washed-up.html

http://forum.sbrforum.com/nba-basket...-vs-ratzz.html

[William Walters]

Ratzz

[PS3]

You can't argue with Ratzz. His *arguments are solely based on his hate towards the Lakers. Go put more asterisks and shits on your posts Ratzz. * * * * *