Do you "cappers" actually CAP games or just read a few ESPN stats and make picks...

[Mens et Manus]

lol reading some of the picks here it's hilarious. You guys are worse than those idiot cappers over at Covers

Aside from Gaunch, and that guy with the big fat white cat as his avatar, you guys are dumb fks

Who lays their entire bankroll on SAS -8 tonight with a key starter out, and a team that's been across the country and back in 72 hours. That plus had 2 regs sit the night before and had 5 days off to have their lactic acid build up and make their legs turn into jello.

You guys need to do a lot more than just read some ESPN stats. lol aaaaah gee wiz look here this team's true shooting percentage is good, and aaahh duh their point differential is better, aaahhh duh their FTA is good too, and aaahhh duh they have a lot of offensive rebounds duhhhhh yaaa looks good, lock it up

[InTheDrink]

you must be referring to pualey poker

do you realize that he's the board laughing stock

tough to categorize the whole board by that moron

[5mike5]

newbie is a moron

basing the whole board off 1 dumb ass pick some1 posted

[milwaukee mike]

I like this guy mens et manus

He is very good at capping games that are already over, teach us

[Easy-Rider 66]

[TheMoneyShot]

I typically just use a huge USA map on my wall. Throw a dart at it... and whichever major US city it lands next to... I take that team. Piece of cake.

[EaglesPhan36]

Anyone who bases any play on anything at ESPN = loser born and bred.

[mcduggly]

lol reading some of the picks here it's hilarious. You guys are worse than those idiot cappers over at Covers

Aside from Gaunch, and that guy with the big fat white cat as his avatar, you guys are dumb fks

Who lays their entire bankroll on SAS -8 tonight with a key starter out, and a team that's been across the country and back in 72 hours. That plus had 2 regs sit the night before and had 5 days off to have their lactic acid build up and make their legs turn into jello.

You guys need to do a lot more than just read some ESPN stats. lol aaaaah gee wiz look here this team's true shooting percentage is good, and aaahh duh their point differential is better, aaahhh duh their FTA is good too, and aaahhh duh they have a lot of offensive rebounds duhhhhh yaaa looks good, lock it up

You're a dumbass if you group us all together like that. There are some very successful threads in this forum. Don't go to Player's talk, go to the sub forums. There are some quality ones in there that are worth looking into.

[El Nino]

Anyone who bases any play on anything at ESPN = loser born and bred.

Normally, I would agree. However, people who tailed Colin Cowherd's NFL picks made loot this year. Guy went 51-24 68% and only had 2 losing weeks all regular season.

[dondude]

Never fukkin heard of ya pal

[pattymayo]

lol this coming from a guy who never posts his own plays, so nobody knows how good (or bad) of a capper he is

[mcduggly]

lol this coming from a guy who never posts his own plays, so nobody knows how good (or bad) of a capper he is

He probably tailed the guy who went all-in with the Spurs -8 and this is his frustration thread after the game ended.

[pattymayo]

You guys need to do a lot more than just read some ESPN stats. lol aaaaah gee wiz look here this team's true shooting percentage is good, and aaahh duh their point differential is better, aaahhh duh their FTA is good too, and aaahhh duh they have a lot of offensive rebounds duhhhhh yaaa looks good, lock it up

that's funny to me. As if there's some special website that is better than ESPn for instance at capping games. Please dude. It's all a coinflip in the end, you just gotta hope you're on the right side more often than not

[mcduggly]

that's funny to me. As if there's some special website that is better than ESPn for instance at capping games. Please dude. It's all a coinflip in the end, you just gotta hope you're on the right side more often than not

I actually disagree. The MAJORITY of games are coinflips, but there are definitely bad lines sometimes or ways to increase your potential to win. But you're right when you say that there are good "capping" websites.

[pattymayo]

I actually disagree. The MAJORITY of games are coinflips, but there are definitely bad lines sometimes or ways to increase your potential to win. But you're right when you say that there are good "capping" websites.

Ehh.. to me sports betting is 80% managing your bankroll. The rest is just luck. No one hits 60% consistently and grinds out profits flat betting. You need to just hope you hit your big plays, and know when to lower your stake when you're cold.

Sure there are bad lines here and there-- but I guarantee you've lost bets before that you thought was a "bad line" and i'm sure you've won some too. This game is designed for a gambler to hit 50% or less and get eaten up on the juice.

[Mens et Manus]

Note the time -

http://forum.sbrforum.com/players-ta...in-win-p2.htmlhttp://forum.sbrforum.com/players-ta...in-win-p2.html

[mcduggly]

Note the time -

http://forum.sbrforum.com/players-ta...in-win-p2.htmlhttp://forum.sbrforum.com/players-ta...in-win-p2.html

You're calling out people who go "all-in" on a bet but you play 4 team parlays? I'd love to see your account balance in a week. Wow, you're pathetic.

[JayLA]

Ehh.. to me sports betting is 80% managing your bankroll. The rest is just luck. No one hits 60% consistently and grinds out profits flat betting. You need to just hope you hit your big plays, and know when to lower your stake when you're cold.

Sure there are bad lines here and there-- but I guarantee you've lost bets before that you thought was a "bad line" and i'm sure you've won some too. This game is designed for a gambler to hit 50% or less and get eaten up on the juice.

sharp post. completely agreed.

[JayLA]

You're calling out people who go "all-in" on a bet but you play 4 team parlays? I'd love to see your account balance in a week. Wow, you're pathetic.

mcduggly, i don't even think you're talking to a genuine person. these people are shills to get more ad revenue.

[mcduggly]

mcduggly, i don't even think you're talking to a genuine person. these people are shills to get more ad revenue.

That's definitely a possibility.