You want a $ winning stat?

[SBR_John]

Teams that lose their starting QB and then get more than a touchdown the following week are 71% against the spread in their next game since 1953....and plus, I saved 15% on my car insurance!! whee...!!

J-E-T-S !! spells casho-O-la this week.

[darkghost]

I love the play!!!
How do u like that total of 31 (currently 30.5 at some spots)?

[SBR_John]

I used to be called the Great Fade Master of NFL totals. I was even fading my own plays for a while but it was kind of confusing trying to find out what I liked so I could bet against it.

Anyway, 30.5 is just stealing on the Over, no two ways about it. So I'm afraid I've now jinxed it and the final will be 2-0 in OT.

[jjgold]

This game could actually be like 17-10

Both bad offenses and solid D's

Be careful here

[Mudcat]

Teams that lose their starting QB and then get more than a touchdown the following week are 71% against the spread in their next game since 1953....and plus, I saved 15% on my car insurance!! whee...!!

J-E-T-S !! spells casho-O-la this week.

It's a good point. Bettors consistently misunderstand how much of a team game football is and over-react to injuries to individual players, particularly quarterbacks.

[Illusion]

I'm with you on this one John, go Jets!!!

[Razz]

The Jets almost certainly won't cover if the game goes over.

[pags11]

oh, ok...so that's an NFL trend...didn't know that...