Everyone not willing to lay the juice on the Hawks will pound the puck line.
-
-
Maybe, I'll never take the goal and a half, way too much juice being paid to get burned by an empty netter. GL if you take it.Comment -
Originally posted by tto827
+1.5 (-115)Comment -
This. That whole empty net shit is always a toss-up, but the Jackets haven't lost by 2 or more in awhile, including a game against the Hawks a few games ago. Plus Chicago is on the backend of a back-to-back. Good luck Canuck.Originally posted by tto827
Comment -
I know, but thats vs. +250. A lot of juice to pay hoping for OT, or that the Hawks can't put one home on the empty net.Originally posted by Vegas39
Because besides the two scenarios listed above, the +250 and -115 are the same bet.Comment -
i parlayed the pl with edm pl paid around +180,,think real good chance edm can beat the blues with the injury issues they having and their overall generally bad play at home, stl just not scoring enough to make me think they win by more than 1 if they win,,hawks play plenty of tight gms and columbus plays hard at least..+180ish felt like pretty good deal...Comment -
Wrote this earlier in another thread, thought I'd share what I found...
Blue Jackets @ Blackhawks, Blue Jackets +1.5 (-115) - Talk about a value pick. Out of the last 10 games for the Blue Jackets, 7 have been within one goal. Out of the last 10 losses by the Blue Jackets, 6 have been within one goal. 5 of the last 6 Blue Jackets losses have been by 1 goal. Now for the fun part... The Blackhawks have had 9 games at home all year, they have won 8 of them. Out of those 8 wins, 7 have come by 1 goal. Only 1 of their home wins has been by more than one goal and that was coming off of two days rest. Again, only thing that worries me is that HTH the Blackhawks PL against the Blue Jackets is 6-1 over the last two years (with that 1 coming a few days ago). Still, coming off a B2B the Blackhawks are 4-0, but 3 of those wins have come by 1 goal. Couple that with the stats above and I'm still taking Blue Jackets +1.5.Comment -
I put 10U on the Blues last night.
I'm putting 15U on this.
Comment -
yeah,,, def seems solidComment -
you took the blues last night? did you not know that they not only have been mediocre at home but that their stud rookie out and during their 4 day break 2 more forwards got hurt during practice? on of them being their best player?Originally posted by No coincidencesI put 10U on the Blues last night.
I'm putting 15U on this.
Comment -
... Jackets ML.Comment -
+249 is ridiculous for a hockey line. Value.Comment -
That's what I'm sayin. And there is absolutely no value in Hawks -1.5 at only +100.Originally posted by stevek173Comment -
I'm on the Blackies -1.5, what the penetrate do I know?Comment -
Last time they played CHi won 1-0
Jakcets had chances and plenty of PP's but could not score.
They get it done tonight +250Comment -
Agreed, tons of value hereOriginally posted by RubberKettleComment -
thats rightOriginally posted by tto827
Even though the Black Hawks aren't pulling away like they use to a month ago, its not worth suffering 59 minutes into a game to get your puckline phucked upComment -
hawks r gonna kill emComment -
Hawks will win 3-2 IMO but no way I take Bluejackets +1.5 because the jackets will have a gaping empty net for the last 90 seconds.Comment -
13 of 20 B-hawks games decided by 1 goal compared to league average of ~50%
something eventually gotta give, either B-hawks start losing close games or they start scoring more empty-nettersComment -
Anyone taking bluejackets -1.5 +700 ?Comment -
No, but I'm playing them @ -1/+584.Originally posted by boeing powerComment -
good call hozerComment -
I'm wondering if I 'm screwed - I got the Jacks @ +250, but Chicago might win in the SO. I should've listed to you guys and taken the +1.5 @ -115 and take the guarantee win.Comment -
Comment -
I wanted to take them but with Jackets injuries didn t like it anymoreComment -
Good win, boys.
Comment
