Should this be allowed.

[SnickerDoodles]

If you have a team at say -3 and already bet on them, and 2 players are announced not play and the lines goes to +1 should you be allowed to cancel you bet if not at the very least change it to what the line is now since the players are out?

[William Walters]

[shari91]

Not sure what the lightbulb is for... usually ppl use it to signal a decent idea. To answer your question: Never.

[Vegas39]

Seriously

[BIGDAY]

Oh boy Doodler...

[Jeffie]

BobbyWaves check in pal, this guy has a serious question.

[GamblerSpirit]

Mental midget

[str]

That door swings both ways.

Would you cancel if you were on the other side?

[Easy-Rider 66]

Snicker. Good to see you are paying back the Man. But you are SOL in this case. The only thing you can do is take the other side -1 and hope you do not lose both. Best thing to do is probably stay with your original position and hope for the best.

[floridagolfer]

Idiotic questions? No, they should not be allowed.

[MUHerd37]

He was joking right? He had to be joking.

[Duff85]

Remember Titan were doing this to customers? If the line moved huge against them they would just cancel the wager. lol

[19th Hole]

And the book should also pay you for wagers that you were going
to make but forgot to call in...

Maybe if you ask nice they will take it down.

[InTheDrink]

this guy doesnt say much for the sbr pro program by being one

[TheCentaur]

[numismatist]

[mynameismud]

[ATTACH]53924[/ATTACH]

[GUMMO77]

If you have a team at say -3 and already bet on them, and 2 players are announced not play and the lines goes to +1 should you be allowed to cancel you bet if not at the very least change it to what the line is now since the players are out?

Never blame yourself.

Never blame the teams.

Don't even blame the books.

Do what I do, and blame Obama.

[sickler]

Good one?

[SnickerDoodles]

I obviously know its not allowed. I was asking should it be allowed I mean if a book offered that I'm sure it would go a Long way in attracting customers

[byronbb]

I obviously know its not allowed. I was asking should it be allowed I mean if a book offered that I'm sure it would go a Long way in attracting customers

Yeah and maybe the book should deal lines without juice.

[mikejamm]

I obviously know its not allowed. I was asking should it be allowed I mean if a book offered that I'm sure it would go a Long way in attracting customers

Yeah and while we're at it, let's have the books send out condolence emails when we lose, that way we'll all feel better when we lose our asses. Idiotic stupid fuk'in question! Cancel or change your bet cause the line changes? Do you have any idea of the logistics of trying to do something like that? Go put your fuk'in dunce cap on and stand over there with the stupid people! Snickerstiff.... proudly stiffing and posting stupid shit! Carry on!

[mikejamm]

this guy doesnt say much for the sbr pro program by being one

The only thing he's a real pro at is stiffing and donking off points he owes!

[SportsMushroom]

this must be ssk

first poster ever to think that losses should not count if a player got injured

[bigblue74]

"Should this be allowed"?"

no youre related ya sick fuk

[mikejamm]

He was joking right? He had to be joking.

He wasn't joking! He wants the books to be nice and say "whoopsie, saw where the line moved against you, cause Boo Boo Jones is out, how about a refund or move to the other side?"

[tto827]

Yeah and maybe the book should deal lines without juice.

That's basically what they would be doing. I'd bet both sides at opening of every game, then change my wager on the bad number getting a better one, and you'd have the opportunity to middle almost every single game.

[BiTeMe UsAdOj]

[tony_come]

Sbr pro

Fukkin sharp

[sickler]

Snickerdoodles was on the wrong side of the injury/line move.

Hey Snickers, what if you had inside info about an injury and hammered the line before news broke. Would you want the bet cancelled?