It's about that time.
Post the book(s) if you see any. thanks.
Post the book(s) if you see any. thanks.
-
-
still looking. I saw a baseball prospectus, but I don't even want to look at that.Comment -
Pound the IndiansComment -
At what number BD5? 100 wins?Originally posted by BigDeem5Comment -
They will be set at about 72Comment -
Baseball Prospectus has them at 80, but you think the number is going to be 72?Originally posted by BigDeem5
For reference, they won 68 last year. Subtract Choo, Add Swisher, Reynolds Stubbs, Bauer, Bourn, and Francona and the public is going to go 50/50 at 72 wins? I'd venture to guess it's closer to 76 or so.Comment -
atlantis got the indians at 77.5, id say over is good thoComment -
2013 MLB Season Win totals
(Courtesy of Atlantis Casino, in Reno, Nev.)
Arizona Diamondbacks 81.5 (-120o)
Atlanta Braves 86
Baltimore Orioles 76.5
Boston Red Sox 79.5 (-120o)
Chicago Cubs 72
Chicago White Sox 80.5
Cincinnati Reds 88.5
Cleveland Indians 77.5 (-120o)
Colorado Rockies 71.5
Detroit Tigers 90
Houston Astros 59.5 (-120o)
Kansas City Royals 79
Los Angeles Angels 89.5 (-120o)
Los Angeles Dodgers 90
Miami Marlins 64.5 (-120u)
Milwaukee Brewers 79.5
Minnesota Twins 64.5
New York Mets 74 (-120u)
New York Yankees 86.5 (-120u)
Oakland Athletics 83 (-120u)
Philadelphia Phillies 81.5
Pittsburgh Pirates 79
San Diego Padres 74.5
San Francisco Giants 86
Seattle Mariners 76.5
St. Louis Cardinals 85.5
Tampa Bay Rays 86
Texas Rangers 87
Toronto Blue Jays 86.5
Washington Nationals 90Comment -
Toronto only 86.5???Comment -
8 teams won over 90 games last year but there's no total over 90 games now??Comment -
Pound this hard over 79Originally posted by EXhoosier10
KC goes 81-81 or better
KC can rake
Cain and Escobar on top is pesky
Meat of the order Gordon-Butler-Moose is solid, then you get to Perez in the 6 hole, who has pop and average for a catcher, he's not Posey or Mauer, but he can rake. Hosmer batting seventh is scary.
Francouer has sneaky pop in the 8 hole, Getz hitting ninth is a no pop .275 infielder.
Shields is a bona fide ace and will win 15 for the Royals, he anchoring the staff with Santana makes them a .500 club (with the bats) or slightly better.Comment -
thanks a million HoosiersOriginally posted by EXhoosier10Comment -
I love their hitting, nash. but check out their rotation after shields...Originally posted by stevenash
Starting Rotation
Jeremy Guthrie
Bruce Chen
Luke Hochevar
Ervin Santana
Will Smith
Luis Mendoza
wow?
Personally, I like baltimore U76.5, but I have to check out scheduling first before I place any betsComment -
Early looksies I like Atlanta over 86, Colorado over 71.5, Detroit over 90.Comment -
INterestingComment -
There is a couple that stand out but this one is interesting. I know it is very low but every single team in the AL is dominant to them This under could very well cash
Houston Astros 59.5
http://espn.go.com/mlb/team/depth/_/...houston-astros
You tell me ?
Blue Jays only at 86.5 is where I figured it would be at. I was thinking 87.5 or 88 so it is not that shocking to me.Comment -
Arizona Diamondbacks - 81.5 (over -120/under -110)
Atlanta Braves - 86 (over -115/under -115)
Baltimore Orioles - 76.5 (over -115/under -115)
Boston Red Sox - 79.5 (over -120/under -110)
Chicago Cubs - 72 (over -115/under -115)
Chicago White Sox - 80.5 (over -115/under -115)
Cincinnati Reds - 88.5 (over -115/under -115)
Cleveland Indians - 77.5 (over -120/under -110)
Colorado Rockies - 71.5 (over -115/under -115)
Detroit Tigers - 90 (over -115/under -115)
Houston Astros - 59.5 (over -120/under -110)
Kansas City Royals - 79 (over 115/under -115)
Los Angeles Angels - 89.5 (over -120/under -110)
Los Angeles Dodgers - 90 (over -115/under -115)
Miami Marlins - 64.5 (over -110/under -120)
Milwaukee Brewers - 79.5 (over -115/under -115)
Minnesota Twins - 64.5 (over -115/under -115)
New York Mets - 74 (over -110/under -120)
New York Yankees - 86.5 (over -115/under -115)
Oakland Athletics - 83 (over -110/under -120)
Philadelphia Phillies - 81.5 (over -115/under -115)
Pittsburgh Pirates - 79 (over -115/under -115)
San Diego Padres - 74.5 (over -115/under -115)
San Francisco Giants - 86 (over -115/under -115)
Seattle Mariners - 76.5 (over -115/under -115)
St. Louis Cardinals - 85.5 (over -115/under -115)
Tampa Bay Rays - 86 (over -115/under -115)
Texas Rangers - 87 (over -115/under -115)
Toronto Blue Jays - 86.5 (over -115/under -115)
Washington Nationals - 90 (over -115/under -115)Comment -
Brewers Under
Mariners under
Indians over
Marlins underComment -
Bolded I like for overs. I like Braves and Mariners Under as well.Originally posted by EASportsComment -
Only thing that may give Houston a chance to go over is that the AL won't have the scouting report on them that the NL does. I know that goes both ways, but I think that helps the team with the least amount of talent.Comment -
Odds to win WS on 5-Dimes. Blue Jays over 86.5 may not be bad...their division is pretty tough thoughLos Angeles Angels <input id="editx" name="C_0" size="4" maxlength="5"> +800 Los Angeles Dodgers <input id="editx" name="C_1" size="4" maxlength="5"> +800 Toronto Blue Jays <input id="editx" name="C_2" size="4" maxlength="5"> +800 Washington Nationals <input id="editx" name="C_3" size="4" maxlength="5"> +800 Detroit Tigers <input id="editx" name="C_4" size="4" maxlength="5"> +900 Atlanta Braves <input id="editx" name="C_5" size="4" maxlength="5"> +1200 New York Yankees <input id="editx" name="C_6" size="4" maxlength="5"> +1250 Cincinnati Reds <input id="editx" name="C_7" size="4" maxlength="5"> +1300 Texas Rangers <input id="editx" name="C_8" size="4" maxlength="5"> +1350 Philadelphia Phillies <input id="editx" name="C_9" size="4" maxlength="5"> +1700 San Francisco Giants <input id="editx" name="C_10" size="4" maxlength="5"> +1700 Boston Red Sox <input id="editx" name="C_11" size="4" maxlength="5"> +2000 St. Louis Cardinals <input id="editx" name="C_12" size="4" maxlength="5"> +2000 Tampa Bay Rays <input id="editx" name="C_13" size="4" maxlength="5"> +2200 Oakland Athletics <input id="editx" name="C_14" size="4" maxlength="5"> +2700 Baltimore Orioles <input id="editx" name="C_15" size="4" maxlength="5"> +4000 Arizona Diamondbacks <input id="editx" name="C_16" size="4" maxlength="5"> +4500 Chicago White Sox <input id="editx" name="C_17" size="4" maxlength="5"> +5000 Kansas City Royals <input id="editx" name="C_18" size="4" maxlength="5"> +5000 Milwaukee Brewers <input id="editx" name="C_19" size="4" maxlength="5"> +5000 Pittsburgh Pirates <input id="editx" name="C_20" size="4" maxlength="5"> +7200 New York Mets <input id="editx" name="C_21" size="4" maxlength="5"> +7500 San Diego Padres <input id="editx" name="C_22" size="4" maxlength="5"> +7500 Cleveland Indians <input id="editx" name="C_23" size="4" maxlength="5"> +7750 Seattle Mariners <input id="editx" name="C_24" size="4" maxlength="5"> +8500 Chicago Cubs <input id="editx" name="C_25" size="4" maxlength="5"> +10000 Colorado Rockies <input id="editx" name="C_26" size="4" maxlength="5"> +10000 Minnesota Twins <input id="editx" name="C_27" size="4" maxlength="5"> +12500 Miami Marlins <input id="editx" name="C_28" size="4" maxlength="5"> +15000 Houston Astros <input id="editx" name="C_29" size="4" maxlength="5"> +20000 Comment -
brewers at 79 wins? that can't be right, they had what 84 last season this season bullpen is 1000 times improved. starting pitcher hella better. weird ass line. defiantly will be putting tons of cash on that.Comment -
um, how is there starting pitching better? and the Bullpen isn't so much "better" as it can't be as terrible as it was last year.Originally posted by neverstoppers23Comment -
The NL Central won't have the 2 layups it had last year in Houston and Chicago. They'll still have Chicago, but the Cubs pitching has improved and their hitting should improve as the season progresses.Comment -
-
love the arizona over. this is a team that will fly under the radar early in the season and might actually contend for the division title.
also that tampa total at 86 looks a bit too high. tough division plus losing shields should definitely hurt them.Comment -
Question: What percentage of your MLB season bankroll should be allotted for MLB futures wagers?
Will be interested in hearing different thoughts about this subject.
Comment -
Think I'm going Boston over 79.5 too. Last year was pretty much an injury riddled lost cause.Comment -
Give me dodgers and Toronto UNDEROriginally posted by EXhoosier10Comment -
that total at 90 is definitely inflated. probably one of the better bets on the board.Originally posted by broadway6
also padres should be an easy over. Improving team decent pitching and of course Petco FieldComment -
Phills over 81.5.. Doesn't get easier then thatComment -
I won't be putting more than 1u on a future of any sort, WS, division, or reg season wins. There is so much variation with injuries over 162 games that these bets are hardly anything but luck.Originally posted by TheGoldenGooseQuestion: What percentage of your MLB season bankroll should be allotted for MLB futures wagers?
Will be interested in hearing different thoughts about this subject.Comment -
I agree. Nobody is talking about the Phillies. Makes for a dangerous team.Originally posted by dlunc3Comment -
Don't really understand the line. Won 81 last yr with utley doc and Howard out half the yr.. And then when they did play, they weren't 100%. They also played half the yr with no center feilder or third basemen, and the whole yr with no bullpen. Since, howard, utley and doc are all 100%, and they added a center feilder, third bAseman, and a solid bullpen. Idk, needing to win only 1 more game seems pretty doableOriginally posted by broadway6Comment -
I usually put 1, 1.5, or 2 units on futures. If I have 100 units, I will bet less than 10 on futures. It allows me to bet less during the season and watch some teams more closely than others.Originally posted by TheGoldenGooseQuestion: What percentage of your MLB season bankroll should be allotted for MLB futures wagers?
Will be interested in hearing different thoughts about this subject.Comment
