Buffalo/Ball St. In-Game-Thread

[donjuan]

Would you guys be saying the game was fixed if Ball St had covered the spread by 34?

[Jayy]

that stadium is cursed

[mmike032]

Would you guys be saying the game was fixed if Ball St had covered the spread by 34?

if Buff was getting the calls Ball did than yes.
if Buff QB was doing the same things Nate Davis was doing than yes.

[whoatommy]

Would you guys be saying the game was fixed if Ball St had covered the spread by 34?

what are you talking about? the refs clearly missed calls all game. if you didn't see any blatant miss-calls by the refs then I question your intelligence.

[Jayy]

david letterman must be disappointed

[$greenbucks$]

This game is definitely fixed Almost 90% of the bettors have their MONEY LINE on BALL STATE. BALL STATE got the BALLS to lose this game on purpose.

[diogee]

So this game was fixed and if it wasn't then Ball St would have won and covered?

[diogee]

I'm sure there was a ridiculous amount of people on Ball St ml and had them thrown in their Lock board ml parlays as well.

[mtneer1212]

Anyone considered the possibility that Ball State was listening to "undefeated" talk and worrying about trying to play Boise State in an undefeated bowl, instead of keeping focus on a spunky well coached Buffalo team, and simply choked? Thats the way I saw it......

[whoatommy]

Anyone considered the possibility that Ball State was listening to "undefeated" talk and worrying about trying to play Boise State in an undefeated bowl, instead of keeping focus on a spunky well coached Buffalo team, and simply choked? Thats the way I saw it......

if you didn't see a blatant miscall on the review for that TD run then you are blind/ have very low IQ

[dwest718]

Anyone considered the possibility that Ball State was listening to "undefeated" talk and worrying about trying to play Boise State in an undefeated bowl, instead of keeping focus on a spunky well coached Buffalo team, and simply choked? Thats the way I saw it......

To say that Ball State "simply choked" is kind of ridiculous. You're saying it wasn't conclusive that the ball wasn't inside the pylon on the no TD call? You're saying that it was conclusive enough that the nose of the ball hit the ground to overturn the completion down near the redzone? These two calls completely changed the game.

Commentators are supposed to be unbiased. They were calling the Buffalo head coach incredible and that he should be up for the SEC jobs, etc. Yet they said the refs clearly got both of these calls wrong. Simply choked? Ok.

[IrishGuy82]

I cant tell what burns more... the Lakers scoring 19 points in the 4th qtr and again failing to cover a game they could and should have covered ((personally screwing up a 4 team parlay worth $550) or this piece of shit game.

[$greenbucks$]

I had the LAKERS TOO

[whoatommy]

I had the LAKERS TOO

same here...and all I asked for was a -3.5 cover...and that didnt happen

[St.Aquinas]

Wrong again, at least I had BU on a teaser...oh well...lol.

St.Aquinas = BIG SQUARE

[TRICKYRATION]

I watched the game from the start. I was so excited I'm going to hit my 6, 7, and 8 teams ML parlay with Ball St as the anchor. I'm crushed...I just laughed at myself..How the game was fixed is so fuking blatant...worst than daylight robbery...Officiating is fixed, QB is fixed...

Well done Buff backers...what a gift...

[mtneer1212]

if you didn't see a blatant miscall on the review for that TD run then you are blind/ have very low IQ

Those who bet huge favs on the ML are the ones with low IQ. They were a 2 1/2 TD fav -- they got hosed on one call, and probably hosed on the second. The game still shouldn't have been that close. Ball State was NEVER covering that game in a million years.

[dwest718]

Those who bet huge favs on the ML are the ones with low IQ. They were a 2 1/2 TD fav -- they got hosed on one call, and probably hosed on the second. The game still shouldn't have been that close. Ball State was NEVER covering that game in a million years.

If they go up 24-14, you think it's the same game? And then when they get a stop and go down and score rather than getting hosed again on the incomplete and make it 27-14 or 31-14, they don't cover? With 6 minutes left in the 3rd?

Not saying they should've covered... but Ball St. should not have lost that game. They win 9 times out of 10. I'll lay -600 on that.

[TRICKYRATION]

Those who bet huge favs on the ML are the ones with low IQ. They were a 2 1/2 TD fav -- they got hosed on one call, and probably hosed on the second. The game still shouldn't have been that close. Ball State was NEVER covering that game in a million years.

What a moron this guy is? Another Monday morning QB...You are a fuking genius Sir!

[dwest718]

Those who bet huge favs on the ML are the ones with low IQ. They were a 2 1/2 TD fav -- they got hosed on one call, and probably hosed on the second. The game still shouldn't have been that close. Ball State was NEVER covering that game in a million years.

Are you saying they don't win 9 out of 10 SU? If not 19 out of 20?

[mtneer1212]

What a moron this guy is? Another Monday morning QB...You are a fuking genius Sir!

I am not a Monday morning QB, nor am I a genius. I am also not a crybaby who thinks the fix is in when I lose a game. How much you betting on USC and Cal on the ML tomorrow?

[whoatommy]

I am not a Monday morning QB, nor am I a genius. I am also not a crybaby who thinks the fix is in when I lose a game. How much you betting on USC and Cal on the ML tomorrow?

You're a moron for not acknowledging that run was a touchdown, and it was reviewed.

[TRICKYRATION]

I am not a Monday morning QB, nor am I a genius. I am also not a crybaby who thinks the fix is in when I lose a game. How much you betting on USC and Cal on the ML tomorrow?

You're an idiot if you cant find anything fishy in that game. Even the Buffalo backers admitted the game is fixed. Maybe you didn't watch the game at all and just followed it on the radio?

[Tsoprano]

Lol Look at what I just told CW via live Chat