Free ESPN Insider - For Real

[loaderunit23]

Like most of you I am frustrated as shit that ESPN tries to force its many readers to buy information regarding sports? Are you kidding me!? Its bad enough that I have to pay that much for NFL ticket, now I have to pay to read something? Anyway, I have been trying to find a way to get it for free on and off for awhile.

Admittedly so, I am a blogger. When I was browsing my blogging network last night I came across a blog that posts every ESPN Insider article. The address is: http://espninsider.blogspot.com/

Have fun with this. If he doesnt have an article you want to read, just request it from him, he will do so. He just put the top 50 MLB free agents up for me.

[St.Aquinas]

Nice!

[Justin7]

Hmm. Not quite spam I guess

[loaderunit23]

No way! I just needed to share this with someone, why would my wife care about this? Therefore, I sought out some forum that people would actually care.

[Chi_archie]

thanks...

lotsa oldie oldsters on that baseball free agent list... shazam

[jjgold]

I pay for it because I am honest and paying ets you everything including real time scores.

[loaderunit23]

You shouldnt have to pay for sports information, its ridiculous, I am all for this

[dwaechte]

You shouldnt have to pay for sports information, its ridiculous, I am all for this

I'd like to see you even try to argue this point. It would be funny.

[loaderunit23]

I don't need to argue with you, its my opinion. You are free to have yours. If I want to look at NBA Trade Rumors I feel I shouldn't have to pay 9.99 a month. The rumor section on Insider is nothing but citations from newspapers across the country.

[dwaechte]

I don't need to argue with you, its my opinion. You are free to have yours. If I want to look at NBA Trade Rumors I feel I shouldn't have to pay 9.99 a month. The rumor section on Insider is nothing but citations from newspapers across the country.

Is it possible, and I'm just going to throw this out there wildly, that you just don't want to pay for it, and have therefore convinced yourself that you shouldn't have to?

ESPN is free to charge whatever they want for their content, and stealing it is stealing. There is no grey line. There is no room for debate, or opinion.

[loaderunit23]

No this is not the case. Again, they simply cite a source, and repost it. This information, such as a Stephon Marbury situation, is open to the public. Just because ESPN slaps the name Insider on it does not mean (in my opinion, which in my caseis all that matters) has the right to charge for it. Say what you want, think what you want, I'm not here to tell you not to think it. I can see that you are really pushing for an argument here, I understand that you must be bored or lonely, but give it up.