Friday's NHL Winners

[cecil127]

Buddy I don't take anyone's advice when it comes to the NHL.

Ever.

great news. dont ever change
even for the volleyball thats beating you simply by fading your own picks. he knows nothing. you however know it ALL!

[cecil127]

Good for you!

I'm happy for you!

Really, I'm fukkin happy you won and stuck it to the books.

I just played it my way and you played it yours.

Good Luck tonight.

appology accepted phillyfag. starting to realize who's in charge here i see....just like a good bitch.

bol to you tonight to phillyfag.

[PhillyFlyers]

ok, here it is. ive moved it into your (heavily viewed) thread (1000+ views in less than an hour, eh?)


copied from the mr mush/phillyfag thread in the hockey forum:



SBR's great Mr. Mush has posted his plays for wednesday 1/23. they are as follows:

Toronto Maple Leafs +1.5 (-160)

Boston Bruins +1.5 (-275) lil juicy for 4 games into the season, dontchya think?

Calgary Flames +1.5 (-220)

Columbus Blue Jackets +1.5 (-235)

for best results id advise you to fade with:

pitt pl (+140) ill go out on a limb here because "pitt ml(-210)' isnt my idea of ideal odds to wager on...
rags ml (-125)
nucks ml (-160)
yotes ml (-150)

Cecil, pittsburgh lost to toronto by 3 goals 5-2. You couldn't possibly have won that bet taking Pitt +1.5 PL.

[cecil127]

sorry for the 25 extra replys this thread needed to "word" this kid up.
its gonna be a long season afterall isnt it?

kid, just come clean with cecil from now on. youre completely outgunned and overpowered.

cause it'llall just keep coming back to: cecil is right. know why? cause cecil dont give a phukk about betting sports but loves picking on the retards who think they know it all!
and that is why the volleyball will prevail in the end.

[PhillyFlyers]

sorry for the 25 extra replys this thread needed to "word" this kid up.
its gonna be a long season afterall isnt it?

kid, just come clean with cecil from now on. youre completely outgunned and overpowered.

cause it'llall just keep coming back to: cecil is right. know why? cause cecil dont give a phukk about betting sports but loves picking on the retards who think they know it all!
and that is why the volleyball will prevail in the end.

Great.

This still doesn't explain how you won a bet on Pitt +1.5 PL and them losing by 3 goals.

Why can't you just admit you tailed my plays but just reversed the odds? It's the only way you could have won.

[cecil127]

Cecil, pittsburgh lost to toronto by 3 goals 5-2. You couldn't possibly have won that bet taking Pitt +1.5 PL.

youre right! pitt did lose to the leafs by 3...very good my little retard bitch. but what you didnt see is that i took the PL (-1.5) cause i didnt care to lay the juice of pitt ml. (-210) pitt lost and it was the only lose that night fading your picks. if i had taken the pitt ml i wouldnt have been able to record such a proffit. i covered my ass fading your picks.....cause i wont let you walk me down the same plank you're on pal.

when you post a +1.5 PL i have two options: the opposite teams ML OR PL (-1.5) and ill always choose the one with the least amount of juice because ive been there-done that.

question from the volleyball:
do you know math? do you understand juice and its effect on your risk/proffit? i think i already know the answers....

[cecil127]

here it is in black and white my little retarded son:



(phillyfags picks)

Toronto Maple Leafs +1.5 (-160) WON (+100)

Boston Bruins +1.5 (-275) lil juicy for 4 games into the season, dontchya think? WON (+100)

Calgary Flames +1.5 (-220) WON (+100)

Columbus Blue Jackets +1.5 (-235) LOST (-235)

for a grand total of 3-1 yet only up (+.65) impressive!


(The Volleyballs fade picks)

pitt pl (+140) ill go out on a limb here because "pitt ml(-210)' isnt my idea of ideal odds to wager on... LOST (-100)
rags ml (-125) WON (+100)
nucks ml (-160) WON +(100)
yotes ml (-150) Won (+100)

so fade plays went 3-1 (+200) nice work Mr. Mush! Thanks for the cash!

[cecil127]

i bet youre still not seeing it, are ya phillyfag?

[PhillyFlyers]

youre right! pitt did lose to the leafs by 3...very good my little retard bitch. but what you didnt see is that i took the PL (-1.5) cause i didnt care to lay the juice of pitt ml. (-210) pitt lost and it was the only lose that night fading your picks. if i had taken the pitt ml i wouldnt have been able to record such a proffit. i covered my ass fading your picks.....cause i wont let you walk me down the same plank you're on pal.

when you post a +1.5 PL i have two options: the opposite teams ML OR PL (-1.5) and ill always choose the one with the least amount of juice because ive been there-done that.

question from the volleyball:
do you know math? do you understand juice and its effect on your risk/proffit? i think i already know the answers....

So you're saying you took the opposite PL which would have been Pitt -1.5.?

That still loses since they lost 5-2.

BTW where do you play because I don't have these options at my book?

EDIT: Never mind. You're saying you had Toronto -1.5.

Damn. I wish my book had these options.

[cecil127]

again: appology (that you can never muster cause you are such a child) accepted phillyfag.
being from philly i realize how hard it is to admit youre wrong. its ok. we wont whoop on ya too hard, right guys?

[cecil127]

So you're saying you took the opposite PL which would have been Pitt -1.5.?

That still loses since they lost 5-2.

BTW where do you play because I don't have these options at my book?

EDIT: Never mind. You're saying you had Toronto -1.5.

Damn. I wish my book had these options.

OMG douchlips i took PITT ML and lost. move on retard. your stuck in 1st gear here idiot.

[PhillyFlyers]

OMG douchlips i took PITT ML and lost. move on retard. your stuck in 1st gear here idiot.

Dude go back and take a look at my last posts. I addressed this.

You took Toronto -1.5

In which case, you still tailed me since you took Toronto.

You're welcome Wilson.

[Big Bear]

lot of shit to read thru... did philly post them yet?

[cecil127]

Dude go back and take a look at my last posts. I addressed this.

You took Toronto -1.5

In which case, you still tailed me since you took Toronto.

You're welcome Wilson.

this dudes either too stupid to read or just enjoying the attention & beating his meat from cecils attention.
im done with you here. see you in your thread of Mr. Mush's Fade Picks!

[cecil127]

lot of shit to read thru... did philly post them yet?

YES HE DID!
see them here:

http://forum.sbrforum.com/hockey-betting/2143320-mr-mushs-phillyflyer-fade-cash-plays-tracked.html

[cecil127]

anyone care to step in and take this kids hand and walk him through someone fading his plays? he obviously cant get the hang of it.

[PhillyFlyers]

anyone care to step in and take this kids hand and walk him through someone fading his plays? he obviously cant get the hang of it.

You took Toronto.

That means you tailed me.

[PhillyFlyers]

You parlaying that bro?

I do have a parlay going but not all 5.

My parlay is Pittsburgh/Winnipeg over 5.5 and Minnesota ML.

Good Luck.

[PhillyFlyers]

hmm, agreeing with minny, but why winnipeg? seems like a small line for pitt, i aint overly impressed with winnipeg's win vs wash

im liking pitt and pl, why winnipeg?

Carpe

Good question and one that I appreciate.

Winnipeg is a different team at home compared to what they play like on the road.

Winnipeg is one of the toughest environments to play in the NHL. They have one of the loudest arenas in the league.

They will be rocking tonight as this will be Winnipeg's first look at Sidney Crosby live and in person.

As such, this will be a game that Winnipeg will be sky high for.

Pittsburgh is not a bad road team and they will certainly take this game seriously though. Which is why I expect the score to go over the 5.5.

However, I do expect that a very motivated Winnipeg team, playing in front of their home crowd, will expose a pretty mediocre Pittsburgh defense.

Therefore, the play is Winnipeg ML and Over 5.5.

Good Luck bro.

[cecil127]

ok, one last time:

where do you see toronto mentioned here?

and i quote:

"pitt pl (+140) ill go out on a limb here because "pitt ml(-210)' isnt my idea of ideal odds to wager on... LOST (-100)"


in a nutshell: you took leafs (+1.5) and i took pitt (-1.5) because a (-210) ml isnt my kind of wager kid.....still faded your play and it hit.
we "middled it" as they say. ever heard that one before?

we both won on that one. lets try it again tonight mr simpleton, mmmmkay?

[PhillyFlyers]

ok, one last time:

where do you see toronto mentioned here?

and i quote:

"pitt pl (+140) ill go out on a limb here because "pitt ml(-210)' isnt my idea of ideal odds to wager on... LOST (-100)"


in a nutshell: you took leafs (+1.5) and i took pitt (-1.5) because a (-210) ml isnt my kind of wager kid.....still faded your play and it hit.
we "middled it" as they say. ever heard that one before?

we both won on that one. lets try it again tonight mr simpleton, mmmmkay?

Cecil, how the fukk did you win Pitt -1.5 with them losing by 3?

[cecil127]

listed it as a loss....thats why i cant understand your argument......pretty balled up about a volleyball taking the opposite of you and making $ arentchya?

[PhillyFlyers]

listed it as a loss....thats why i cant understand your argument......pretty balled up about a volleyball taking the opposite of you and making $ arentchya?

[tony_come]

Minny+sbrforum=mushed

[cecil127]

now 3000+ views? somethings fishy
unless......someone really, really likes themselves

[PhillyFlyers]

now 3000+ views? somethings fishy
unless......someone really, really likes themselves

I told you I'm the star of SBR.

[cecil127]

I told you I'm the star of SBR.

and you proved them right

so how many times did you sit there self promoting/hitting the refresh button

[cecil127]

whoa, 3 hours old and the topic has 4.8K views? thats gotta be an sbr record!

geez, the lengths some phillyfags will go to prove a point.

somebody give this guy the hook...he's Bot for christs sake

[PhillyFlyers]

whoa, 3 hours old and the topic has 4.8K views? thats gotta be an sbr record!

geez, the lengths some phillyfags will go to prove a point.

somebody give this guy the hook...he's Bot for christs sake

Why are you accusing me of something I didn't do?

People love my threads. Just take a look at this month.

I think I got like 2 or 3 threads in the Saloon with over 2,000 views each and one with like 6,000 views+.....for the fukkin Saloon! Where like nobody ever goes since this forum is dominated by Players Talk.

I told you Cecil, I am the star of SBR.

The Golden One.

Don't hate. Appreciate.

[cecil127]

never met someone so proud of there "views" and even quotes the numbers. a very special attention whore we have indeed!
do you tell your mommy and daddy how popular you are over dinner upstairs?


and please....the name is "wilson" the one you adore

[cecil127]

now 3000+ views? somethings fishy
unless......someone really, really likes themselves

now 5K+ views an hour later?
you really outdoing yourself philly f\*g!!!
whats it gonna top out at in another hour? 7K?

[CarpeDime]

now 5K+ views an hour later?
you really outdoing yourself philly f\*g!!!
whats it gonna top out at in another hour? 7K?

look, this has been addressed before, PhillyFlyers has "It", "It" being "Star Power"

just a fact, what he does gets attention and views on a different level

that's not necessarily a compliment, I mean some people who have "It" are heroic, such as Jimi Hendrix, others who have "It" are not, such as Snooki

But they both have "It" and so does PhillyFlyers

He made a thread about how if he made a thread about taking a sh*t it would get 1,000 views, and that thread itself had views through the roof within a few hours

I can't vouch for his handicapping, he may or may not be +EV in NHL, but he has Other Level posting Star Power

[Vegas39]

Carpe also had visions of mariachi bands

[PhillyFlyers]

now 5K+ views an hour later?
you really outdoing yourself philly f\*g!!!
whats it gonna top out at in another hour? 7K?

Look, you're making it seem like I'm being some kind of attention whore.

Nothing could be further from the truth.

I can't help it if I make a thread and it attracts attention.

I don't control what thread people click and don't click. That's all I'm saying.

For whatever reason, my threads attract all kinds of attention.

I make a thread in the Saloon asking if people tried moonshine and it gets 400 views.

I can't help that.

You're making it seem like I'm forcing or telling people to click my threads.

You're also acting like your in some way, jealous.

You say I'm an attention whore yet, you are my biggest follower Wilson.

Ask yourself...did I ever force you to click on even one of my threads?

Of course not. You decide to follow me. You ask me for me NHL plays.

You ask me to provide you with answers.

I say I'm the star of SBR. I see it as a simple statement of fact, easily provable by the amount of attention my threads get.

You see it as me looking for attention.

I think it's pretty obvious which view is correct and which one is erroneous (yours).

[cecil127]

and now closing in on 12K views in 4 hours

12000 divided by 240= ~50 views a minute.

well the good news is apparently 1/2 the wells fargo capacity center saw your picks in the past 4 hours.
hope they are winners
cause thats an awful lot of people to appologize/make excuses to.

so why did the moonshine topic get a fraction of this amount?
yet the thread you claimed will draw attention somehow blew up the charts?
explain: you do such a good job of it