stanford -3.5 is a money pick!!!

[pinnacle420]

title says it all..stanford college b-ball is a lock!!!
1000-975

load up and thank me later

[Frisco]

Should have loaded up when it was -1.5 then

[pinnacle420]

Should have loaded up when it was -1.5 then

yep its a double digit cover!!!

[tatddy]

Bad line. Good luck though.

[Bostongambler]

gl guy, but you can get 3 out there at some shops still.

[No coincidences]

Get a bad line for USC games in LA at your own peril.

[riffraff24]

Kevin O'neil lives in my building. Gonna slash his tires so he doesnt make the game.

[LT Profits]

Stanford -2 for me

[Madison]

Get a bad line for USC games in LA at your own peril.

Smelled to me as well at 1.5/2. Either that or we're going to be sorry. 1.5 to 3.5 lot $$ on one side no?

[pinnacle420]

ya it jumped i liked it at anything below 6.... didnt think it would jump so high but ya i think it should still be good at 3.5

[SexyMit]

USC for me. Outright

[VegasInsider]

Already on Stanford -2

This guy is an idiot making lock threads

[sweethook]

its running up

[Bostongambler]

Already on Stanford -2

This guy is an idiot making lock threads

No such thing as a lock. But it's a kids forum. gl

[Frisco]

Hate how much love Stanford is getting

[tatddy]

Im a Stan fan but this was a bad spot for them

[No coincidences]

Im a Stan fan but this was a bad spot for them

No reason for them to lose this game. Dominated the 1H, better/smarter players, better/smarter coach. Nine points the first 11 minutes of the 2H? Are you kidding me?

[turtlejc]

Smh go look at my spreadsheet..gave back half my winnings listening to this thread lol

[tatddy]

No reason for them to lose this game. Dominated the 1H, better/smarter players, better/smarter coach. Nine points the first 11 minutes of the 2H? Are you kidding me?

They are too inconsistent. I've never been a fan of Dawkins as a head coach. I'd never back Stanford as a fave on the road especially with the public on them. Op got a terrible line.

I was pretty big on uc Santa Barbara. My only play today. Barely squeezed that out.

[No coincidences]

They are too inconsistent. I've never been a fan of Dawkins as a head coach. I'd never back Stanford as a fave on the road especially with the public on them. Op got a terrible line.

I was pretty big on uc Santa Barbara. My only play today. Barely squeezed that out.

I had Cal Poly and the Stanford ML. What a gag job -- especially vs. USC. They are a horrible team and O'Neill is about as bad as it gets.

[t-wizzle]

Stanford was as square as it gets.

[No coincidences]

Stanford was as square as it gets.

Yeah, no shit? Thanks for the clarification.

Square plays have been cash money in college hoops so far this season in case you haven't noticed.

[Frisco]

USC hasn't really been playing all that bad lately.

[Untied]

Stanford missed a dunk at the buzzer. That would've forced OT,

WTF!

[SexyMit]

Smh go look at my spreadsheet..gave back half my winnings listening to this thread lol

Not if you had listened to me. I said win outright

[Bostongambler]

But the creator of this thread said it was a Lock. I don't see how this could of happened. ( rolling my eyes)

[Frisco]

But the creator of this thread said it was a Lock. I don't see how this could of happened. ( rolling my eyes)

Yep, road conference game against an adequate team is a lock. Some ppl rode the fade USC, UCLA, and Texas trains just a little too long

[No coincidences]

USC hasn't really been playing all that bad lately.

Why? Because they beat Dayton at home?

They were 5-8 overall and had lost seven of eight before last night. They're a shitty team with a shitty coach playing a "home game" (if you could call it that -- the only home court advantage USC has is when things get shady like they did last night) and this was a shitty loss for Stanford. Period.

[Frisco]

Why? Because they beat Dayton at home?

They were 5-8 overall and had lost seven of eight before last night. They're a shitty team with a shitty coach playing a "road game" (if you could call it that -- the only home court advantage USC has is when things get shady like they did last night) and this was a shitty loss for Stanford. Period.

Time to move on to the next play

[No coincidences]

Time to move on to the next play

Sorry -- just don't see USC as an "adequate team" by any means.

[pinnacle420]

theres no reason why we should of lost this game... they missed more than 1 dunk in 2nd half just awful..

[Frisco]

Sorry -- just don't see USC as an "adequate team" by any means.

I understand the frustration. I was close to hammering opening line of -1.5 and glad I restrained myself. Just felt wrong for some reason. I think they're adequate meaning they definitely aren't good but can still surprise folks and win a few games. Still, Stanford had no business losing that game so went full circle and still understand your frustration

[No coincidences]

I understand the frustration. I was close to hammering opening line of -1.5 and glad I restrained myself. Just felt wrong for some reason. I think they're adequate meaning they definitely aren't good but can still surprise folks and win a few games. Still, Stanford had no business losing that game so went full circle and still understand your frustration

Stanford scored 42 points in the first half and then 9 in the first 11 minutes of the second half. It's like they forgot how to play basketball. And don't even get me started about the last minute of the game.

Ralphie is right about USC games in LA.