A play that looks like a winner?
Seems that way on here sometimes. I know that always picking favs would be considered square, but I know a guy who bets no dogs, only favs and ususally big favs. He's been buried a couple times this year (like the Bama/TAMU game, but that was mostlr because I egged his ass on as soon as the line was out.. lol) but he is a very intelligent dude and has doubled his roll the last two years. I don't pick all faves, probably a little over 50 pct, but it seems like some fools around here bet 90 pct dogs, call guys square for their plays, and then regularly get buried when the fave covers. And it seems like some just post stupid plays hoping they will hit so they can be "sharp".
My definition of a square is someone who is obsessed with DEEMing every play sharp or square. Just sayin.
With that said, here's my square NFL fukkin winners for the week:
Balty
Colts -3.5 +100
Atlanta
and....
HOUSTON -3.5 +100 and ML and BIG!!
Eat it up, "SHARPS"!
Seems that way on here sometimes. I know that always picking favs would be considered square, but I know a guy who bets no dogs, only favs and ususally big favs. He's been buried a couple times this year (like the Bama/TAMU game, but that was mostlr because I egged his ass on as soon as the line was out.. lol) but he is a very intelligent dude and has doubled his roll the last two years. I don't pick all faves, probably a little over 50 pct, but it seems like some fools around here bet 90 pct dogs, call guys square for their plays, and then regularly get buried when the fave covers. And it seems like some just post stupid plays hoping they will hit so they can be "sharp".
My definition of a square is someone who is obsessed with DEEMing every play sharp or square. Just sayin.
With that said, here's my square NFL fukkin winners for the week:
Balty
Colts -3.5 +100
Atlanta
and....
HOUSTON -3.5 +100 and ML and BIG!!
Eat it up, "SHARPS"!
