Attn: Compaq Dikk Super Stiff Page updated

[Richkas]

Regular stiff page should be updated soon.

[Brock Landers]

Richie, did you say something recently about NOT being a spokesman for CW anymore? LOL

Hey, you haven't made a vid lately, how about one!

[Richkas]

Richie, did you say something recently about NOT being a spokesman for CW anymore? LOL

Hey, you haven't made a vid lately, how about one!

Vid's resume this weekend.

CreditWagering

A+ book

A must have out.

[SlickFazzer]

I want to make dirty love to your avatar Richie.

[jjgold]

I wonder if any SBR guys on it?

[pavyracer]

On the regural stiff page there is a father/son or uncle/nephew team. You can't make this shyt up guys.

[mathdotcom]

most likely sbr guy on that list is pat venditto

[sickler]

On the regural stiff page there is a father/son or uncle/nephew team. You can't make this shyt up guys.

The funny part is their last name is "Crooks".

And there are actually three "Crooks" stiffs from the same city in Texas. Two regular and one super.

[mathdotcom]

No difference between a super stiff and regular stiff.

[sickler]

No difference between a super stiff and regular stiff.

Sure there is. One bit the hand that fed them. The other didn't.

[mathdotcom]

Principle is the same. Just because they got paid first doesn't really matter.
$$ owed is $$ owed

[pavyracer]

The funny part is their last name is "Crooks".

And there are actually three "Crooks" stiffs from the same city in Texas. Two regular and one super.

I just saw the super stiff on other page. I just wonder if the father "borrowed" his kids DL's to stiff them even more. Crooks operation.

[sickler]

Principle is the same. Just because they got paid first doesn't really matter.
$$ owed is $$ owed

Ask cw. I'm sure they'll say the superstiff bothers them a lot more.

[mathdotcom]

It shouldn't.

If I sign up at CW and win $1000, withdraw it, then lose $1000 and don't pay, then CW at that point is out $1000.

If I sign up at CW and lose $1000 immediately and don't pay, CW at that point is out $1000.

Perhaps it is more insulting not to pay up after you've won, but economically speaking there is no difference.

[pavyracer]

It shouldn't.

If I sign up at CW and win $1000, withdraw it, then lose $1000 and don't pay, then CW at that point is out $1000.

If I sign up at CW and lose $1000 immediately and don't pay, CW at that point is out $1000.

Perhaps it is more insulting not to pay up after you've won, but economically speaking there is no difference.

Mathy: in the first scenario CW lost $2,000.

What am I missing here?

[sickler]

Exactly, Pavy.

Mathy needs to work on his math. Irony

[tmoney]

(nothing intelligent here)

[mathdotcom]

In my example, both players stole $1000, even though the first player cost CW more.

Do you see the difference or do I have to use puppets?

[sickler]

It shouldn't.

If I sign up at CW and win $1000, withdraw it, then lose $1000 and don't pay, then CW at that point is out $1000.

If I sign up at CW and lose $1000 immediately and don't pay, CW at that point is out $1000.

Perhaps it is more insulting not to pay up after you've won, but economically speaking there is no difference.

Umm, read your post again. It's pretty clear.

[mathdotcom]

So this is what it's like teaching elementary school.

[pavyracer]

In my example, both players stole $1000, even though the first player cost CW more.

Do you see the difference or do I have to use puppets?

Mathy, you have to compare apples with apples, not oranges.

In the first one, the player stole $1000 dollars and caused a $1,000 loss of unpaid debt to CW which is a cumulative $2,000 loss.

In the second one he just caused a $1,000 loss from not paying his debt.

[sickler]

So this is what it's like teaching elementary school.

No offense, but are you ever dumb.

[mathdotcom]

The first player earned the first $1000 and then stole the second $1000. A stiff is someone who does not pay what he owes. This player owes $1000.

The second player also owes $1000.

I know what you're saying for why CW differentiates the two. But these two guys both stole the same amount.

If you go to a casino and win $100 playing blackjack, and then steal $100 from a cocktail waitress, when you get caught by the police you will be charged with a theft of $100, even though your visit to the casino cost them $200.

[sickler]

It shouldn't.

If I sign up at CW and win $1000, withdraw it, then lose $1000 and don't pay, then CW at that point is out $1000.

If I sign up at CW and lose $1000 immediately and don't pay, CW at that point is out $1000.

Perhaps it is more insulting not to pay up after you've won, but economically speaking there is no difference.

Read you above quote again, genius. Sober up if need be.

[mathdotcom]

You don't ever reply to my posts after that. I'm showing the difference between what a player cost CW and what a player stole from CW. There's a difference.

If you win $100,000 from CW and they pay you, and then the next day you make a $5 losing bet and run away, would you say that you stiffed CW $5 or $100,005? Don't reply to this post if you don't answer this question.

[In my above post when I said "then CW at that point is out $1000", I am referring to the amount owed, not the "total cost to having the stiff sign up to begin with".]

[compaqDikk]

thanks richy.

oh man, i will study this for the next 3 days closely

my first thought. the first upper left is a confirmed tranny on superstiff page. i found this out the hard way

there is one guy with 3 foreheads that puts the guy with 2 foreheads to shame (on super stiff)

on regular stiff, there's a chick from a univ that's i wouldn't mind breaking my 15 year slump with. man i love bitter ex boyfriends

i remember copying my roomates DL in college while he was napping. i'll have to see if i kept it

[mathdotcom]

i think compaq is a babysitter with a lot of action on the side

[sickler]

You don't ever reply to my posts after that. I'm showing the difference between what a player cost CW and what a player stole from CW. There's a difference.

If you win $100,000 from CW and they pay you, and then the next day you make a $5 losing bet and run away, would you say that you stiffed CW $5 or $100,005? Don't reply to this post if you don't answer this question.

[In my above post when I said "then CW at that point is out $1000", I am referring to the amount owed, not the "total cost to having the stiff sign up to begin with".]

What's the point in discussing? You don't know the difference between a company being shorted 1K and 2K. It's all the same to you.

[mathdotcom]

Told you not to respond until you answered my $100,005/$5 question.

Nice to know who on the board has a high school education.

[sickler]

Told you not to respond until you answered my $100,005/$5 question.

Nice to know who on the board has a high school education.

Certainly not you, genius.

[compaqDikk]

damn, i have to update the CW stiff AIDS quilt that i'm laying out on the whiteHouse lawn on AIDS day december 1

[Richkas]

damn, i have to update the CW stiff AIDS quilt that i'm laying out on the whiteHouse lawn on AIDS day december 1

[fiveteamer]

LOL

damn, i have to update the CW stiff AIDS quilt that i'm laying out on the whiteHouse lawn on AIDS day december 1

[Richkas]

I want to make dirty love to your avatar Richie.

I know slick

I would do everything known to man that could be done.

[fiveteamer]

I know slick

I would do everything known to man that could be done.

Would you eat Brent Crude's toe jam?