Help With Prop Bet

Louisvillekid1 · 11-12-12, 03:46 PM

Yes if you bet KC -1/2 you need one more TO for that to cash...

And Romeo is benching anyone who commits a TO ....

EDIT

Frisco · 11-12-12, 03:47 PM

No. It's saying that add up all of KC and Pitts TO's and KC will be favored by -.5. So KC will have to have 1 more turnover than Pitt for it to cash.

milwaukee mike · 11-12-12, 03:47 PM

lkid you're wrong

you take kc turnovers vs pitt turnovers

if they both turn it over once, for example, then pitt +1/2 is the winner

Frisco · 11-12-12, 03:48 PM

Originally posted by Frisco

No. It's saying that add up all of KC and Pitts TO's and KC will be favored by -.5. So KC will have to have 1 more turnover than Pitt for it to cash.

Which is why KC is -135 b/c they're expected to turn the ball over more. Pitt only forced a handful of TO's this year so be careful

The Inevitable · 11-12-12, 03:58 PM

Thanks for the speedy answers. I think frisco and milwaukee mike are right. KC needs one more TO than Pitt for the -1/2 to cash. Would have been funny had I loaded up on KC -1/2, thinking all I needed was one turnover from them to hit that bet.

The Inevitable · 11-12-12, 04:06 PM

Originally posted by Frisco

Which is why KC is -135 b/c they're expected to turn the ball over more. Pitt only forced a handful of TO's this year so be careful

Yeah, I think I still might take it though. So far it's seems like the best prop bet.

shaunovery · 11-12-12, 04:06 PM

Kansas needs to commit less turnovers than the steelers to win

It's like a spread on turnovers with the chiefs getting 0.5 start

The Inevitable · 11-13-12, 09:53 AM

Originally posted by Frisco

Which is why KC is -135 b/c they're expected to turn the ball over more. Pitt only forced a handful of TO's this year so be careful

I took your advice dude, you saved me some money. Real pathetic Pitt manage to only mustard up 1 damn turnover.