Okay This is REALLY Getting On My Nerves Now (Arizona over Seattle)

[VegasDave]

Okay, you can say I over analyze things, you can say I shouldn't focus on the public so much, that there is no such thing as trap games, thats all fine.

But honestly, when virtually 80 - 90% of bettors are on one side of a game and the line doesn't move and the heavily bet side also has less juice, VEGAS LOSES MONEY ON THESE GAMES.

Why wasn't the line moved to 3.5 or 4 or higher when the public poured money into Arizona? Why did Arizona bettors get -105 or +100 or better odds? Arizona was a clear cut easy choice, and everyone pounded them.

What the fvck is wrong with bookmakers lately? This is three straight weeks of trap games and odd lines that they've just been getting buried. I can't remember a time where so many super-easy winners have actually won!

I can't cap without my philosophy picks...

[MrMonkey]

I was nervous!

Liked Arizona all week and was scared because of the same thing but stuck with them anyway. I start looking for more info. than was necessary. Wait for your newsletter next week! Thanks.

[DeluxeLiner]

Dave, I feel you. I couldn't touch that game. I think Hasselback coming back was overhyped, and Vegas got a little too cute with that and that Arizona has problems winning in Seattle. Really wanted to be with all the public on Arizona but I hate it when it's me and the public.

[Kingctb27]

Football is played on the field, not in vegas.

[fiveteamer]

My theory is that Dave bets 1 dime a side on all his picks.