Much simpler than the NFL one...
Fade the Lakers every game
Bet on San Antonio every game
more to come as I tighten up the numbers
Fade the Lakers every game
Bet on San Antonio every game
more to come as I tighten up the numbers
-
-
Originally posted by wantitall4moi
Been on the forums since 1995 and this is the best you can come up with.Comment -
Didn't you say LAL wouldn't make the playoffs last season?Originally posted by wantitall4moiComment -
Originally posted by Al Masters
yeah because since 2007 you'd be 502-437 against generic closers following this advice.
I 'll go even better than that, since 2009 its 298-237. Line shopping would put it around 305-229.
Show me anyone who has done that 'handicapping' the NBA in the past 3 years.Comment -
1-0 so far.Comment -
Updated 2-1
Lakers fade 2-0
Spurs follow 0-1Comment -
Comment -
You might be on to something with the Lakers...?Comment -
i second that. fading lakers all the wayComment -
thanks wanti
Comment -
so all bets on spurs vs thunders today?Comment -
Tally up another laker fadeComment -
3-1-1 so far this season. Could be 3-2 if youre a goof and laid the 2.5 with the Spurs the other night.
Lakers are always the big money play in this system however.Comment -
Haha hilarious. Might play these small just for funComment -
havent updated it but theyre both playing tonight...
5-1-1 on the season.
EDIT: I wont bet against the Clippers at home.Comment -
lakers a dog tonight....damn they suckComment -
Hell of a lot simpler then your NFL 'system'
Comment -
Jazz look like the 90s Jazz out thereComment -
sorry I didnt bump this BEFORE the game.
Updated record 10-5-1
Fade Lakers 5-3
On Spurs 5-2-1Comment -
Been fading the Lakers since game 1
They have a bunch of easy games coming up so we'll see what happensComment -
Any update on results ?
Also would like to hear thoughts on tonites LAC/SA
Spurs should win IMO on ML. might be a nail biter thoComment -
lakers are gonna be good. they just needed to play together for couple games.
kobe's been hustling for loose balls and actually sharing the rock.
i'm actually glad phil jackson didn't get the job with that boring ass triangle offense.
bring showtime back to la baby!!!!Comment -
Like the spurs today over Memphis
Comment -
OK this hasnt been updated in awhile....
Fade Lakers 11-7
ON Spurs 11-6-1
One asterisk on Spurs game with Miami when they sat everyone, they still covered the original number and easily covered the 13.5 it closed at.Comment -
Fade Lakers 13-9. ML home dogs when theyre road fav 4-2 +5.20 or so extra
ON Spurs 15-6-1
Overall 28-15-1.Comment -
Been eating off this..txs wantiComment -
lol.. brilliantOriginally posted by wantitall4moi
Comment -
quite simpleComment -
Why not include Miami, or any of the other teams in the league?
BAUSComment -
because they dont have a track record like these two teams do.Originally posted by BAUS
You can look at teams before the year and think they will be over rated, but that doesnt mean they will be or that people will bet them.
The beauty of the Lakers is that books put up incredibly dumb lines on them and peopel still bet them like its 2001. Lakers opened -5 and went to -7. I only know of a single game where the line went against the lakers and that was in Houston when Pau was a late scratch, and even then it took about 4 hours for people to actually move the number.
Miami had been a decent fade the past couple years, especially for a team with a lot of Su wins, but Lakers are by far better. So why gamble when you have a sure thing?
I spelled it out in this thread, in the past 7 years Lakers and Spurs combined are 530-452 ATS. That includes this years numbers. If youre looking for more than that youre just greedy, and thats why gamblers lose, they start doing shit they dont need to to try and make more money. If you really MUST do something 'special' take home dogs on the ML against the lakers on the road. But even that isnt automatic enough to warrant it every game. So it still ends up being a gamble.
Fading the Lakers and betting on the Spurs is as automatic as it gets. I ran the numbers last week, Lakers since 200 (they have made the finals 7 times in that stretch and western conf semifinals a 3 more times, so they had some decent teams in that stretch. have only had 3 winning seasons ATS, and 2 of those seasons combined were less than 8 games over 500. One season they did very well going something like 69-35 ATS.
Heat since the 'Big 3" are 146-62 SU and 106-101-1 ATS, not exactly fade material. Nor can you bet on them and make much either.
But it is all about recognizing certain teams. There are other teams I do play, I just dont advertise them. I think giving this so much attention was enough. But it would take more than this forum to overcome the stupidity of Laker backers. Although the Spurs have had some major league spread put on them, but they still keep covering despite it. Lines on the Spurs are inflated more than a point higher than they 'should' be.Comment -
Lots of Laker road games coming up
Comment -
Wanti blade sharpComment -
I have a feeling your threads aren't really affecting the movement of NBA lines worldwide...Originally posted by wantitall4moi
How much money do you bet on your Laker fades, and how much on the Spurs?
BAUSComment -
I wouldnt imagine they are, I bet with a local , a few actually, in the southern cal area one of them even calls me up to lay off action sometimes if he is too lopsided. But only in games he is nervous about. But I also get lines that are better than most places offer as well, usually doent matter but it has a couple times in the past 2 years. That might seem backwards since a lot of locals profile guys and gouge them, but these guys arent small time hacks, plus I dont bet with the same guys evy game I switch it up a little. Spurs games not so much. So amounts I have vested vary greatly. If I am just betting the game on my own right around 3Gs probably. If I double dip and add a ML it hits 5G or so. So nothing earth shatteringly large. But doing that last year was enough to bankroll my whole baseball season which I flipped into almost as much money as I ever made betting baseball when I was gambling 'full time'. But with the new developments I wont be doing baseball this summer probably. So NBA is it. But its enough.Originally posted by BAUS
But so many dummies bet the Lakers around here that you could right a book and highlight the records and show people it was 'free' money, and they would still bet on them. And more than likely some math geek airbet loser would write a book citing 'regressing to the mean'.Comment -
starting your system tonightOriginally posted by wantitall4moiComment
