If you have no affiliation or know nothing about the CW operation and you are warning people not to give them one bit of information why even grade them?
-
-
Bill and John are stand up guys...oh Ganch also
now the rest of em??
thats a whole different story
I wouldnt be surprised if pimike paid 'someone' for that rating
and Im not joking eitherComment -
Have there been warnings lately? I think Justin was skeptical at first, yet here they still are making timely 4-figure payouts.Comment -
man I tell you....Originally posted by LT Profits
you are getting faster than rickhas when it comes to defending these clowns
they must take care of you really well
LT=CW spokesperson/tout?Comment -
No, LT = CW big winnerComment -
LT is online often. He gets treated well by them as far as getting paid and playing. Things are well. If his experiences are positive, why not chime in w/ his experiences? I just read another post where he advises to some fellow that they probably shouldn't be his primary book. His just gives his opinion and makes a logical suggestion to this fellow.Originally posted by Delete ThisComment -
Why is every other post about CW. Why does anyone care if they are affiliated with SBR. Wouldn't that just make them more legit?
All your doing is giving them more business with all these silly posts.Comment -
this goes down as a canidate for one of the most ridiculous posts of 2008Originally posted by MastaBComment -
I actually nominate yours since we are in 2008, not 2007. It is almost 2009.Originally posted by Delete ThisComment -
Originally posted by robmpink
Comment -
PG,Originally posted by PureGuava
I don't understand your question. If we only rated good books we would just have a list, a very short one.
CW is a neighborhood bookie that thinks it can benefit from any kind of press, good or bad. They shill hard and work the forums through their customers and their staff. Even their stiff page tries to play the forum and is part of their referral program. Obviously they aren't professional, don't have capitol to start a marketing campaign, or a viable business model. It's likely that they will eventually be taking bets they can't pay on.
Like SBR_John said in another thread, to say that CW is related to SBR is an idea most likely created by the sportsbook for more anything-goes press.Comment -
wow you can catch a type-o as the 7 is right next to the 8Originally posted by robmpink
shapes and colors tomorrow
Comment -
so why are their shills allowed to exist...here?Originally posted by Bill DozerComment -
You mean a typo? Stop trying to sound like you have an eighth grade education when you really have a sixth grade education. Oh, get off my dick.Originally posted by Delete Thiswow you can catch a type-o as the 7 is right next to the 8
shapes and colors tomorrowComment -
A shill is basically someone employed by a company to promote them.
The postive posts about them at SBR are from satisfied customers that have been paid by them, myself included.Comment -
your name is rob...you wear pink and you speak about dickOriginally posted by robmpink
here...I found your local hangout on youtube
Comment -
Some of them are addressed but others are part-timers who just do enough to light the match on the topic of "betting on credit." We try to organize the forum and let it run itself but we may be at the point where it is best to merge the CW stuff together.Originally posted by Delete ThisComment -
I guess so. Keep up the great contributions here!Originally posted by Delete ThisComment -
Some of you guys are to paranoid. I realize some of you old phucks (geeks) that have never taken many chances in their lives would not like a creditwagering.
But people who have taken chances in their lives know there are certain risks you got take to get ahead. This is called street sense. Which by looking at some of the vegas pictures alot of you dont have.Comment -
CW is the worst book ever. At some point 50% of the posts in Players Talk were made by paid employees of them. Best move they ever made was to fire Richkas.Comment -
CW spends a lot of time on the board working on who is who. It's not hard to match up plays and payout dates to screen names when majority of your users come from the board. They know who to spend time with on the phone and who is the last guy in line if things go bad. Posters should keep this in mind when they read unbiased feedback from other posters.Comment -
Good point Bill. This is why I don't use mysbr spreadsheet anymore. I don't want books to lower my limits. I also occasionally post bogus picks to keep them off track. When you see the word fade in my picks play the opposite. I try to blow ash in their eyes.Originally posted by Bill DozerComment -
DacBietViet uses a similar system.Originally posted by pavyracerOriginally posted by pags11Originally posted by BuddyBearOriginally posted by curiousComment -
He's smart taco.Originally posted by tacomaxComment -
I think you are ok with your spreadsheet since books already know what you are betting with them and don't care about your name. But, if you wanted you can hide amounts or use units and no sportsbook so its like any other pick tracker online.Originally posted by pavyracer
I think it really only matters when you are using a small bookie that monitors what its players say about them in a forum.Comment -
Originally posted by Bill Dozer
I think this is a good idea. Site Promotions makes a lot of sense to me.
I realize SBR is always in a tough position when it comes to organizing the forum and there will always be someone dissatisfied. But SBR has some prior record of not allowing itself to be shamelessly used like it has been by CW.
I recall action being taken against BETonSPORTS shills - and that was before the major STIFF finally happened, while they were still just a shady obnoxious organization like CW.
Similar situations IMO.
I mean seriously, I'm sure the shills would whine but who cares about a bunch of shills besides those shills? Just swat them with a broom.Comment -
Mudcat,
Very good post. I would use the Dyson vacuum though instead of the broom.Comment
