Bears/Lions under 46.5

No coincidences · 10-22-12, 08:45 PM

Still trying to figure out the 47.5 open.

StackinGreen · 10-22-12, 08:46 PM

Originally posted by ThaTopMoron

first half under easy money. overall for game, under looking pretty good. Field goal just blocked. nice

Detroit isn't doing their part to score

Yup, all over it

ermzzy · 10-22-12, 08:50 PM

looks like a solid bet, no way it goes over unless lions start having a mental lapse and cutler start shredding them in the 2nd half

broadway6 · 10-22-12, 08:51 PM

what was the over/under on Lions first downs?

paco · 10-22-12, 08:52 PM

Originally posted by ermzzy

looks like a solid bet, no way it goes over unless lions start having a mental lapse and cutler start shredding them in the 2nd half

Here comes Jason Campbell, under is golden now lmao

ttrace35 · 10-22-12, 08:52 PM

Lakerboy sharp as usual.

ttrace35 · 10-22-12, 08:53 PM

Campbell's soup.

sitzlejd · 10-22-12, 08:54 PM

Campbell running is hilarious.

leetreaper · 10-22-12, 08:57 PM

Originally posted by ttrace35

Campbell's soup.

lolz priceless...

k13 · 10-22-12, 09:10 PM

All that steam got the call...

StackinGreen · 10-22-12, 09:19 PM

I called this result last Monday, foolz

proper respect where due

hawley · 10-22-12, 09:20 PM

Originally posted by StackinGreen

I called this result last Monday, foolz

proper respect where due

Who are you?

thetrinity · 10-22-12, 09:21 PM

pinnacle ate this one.

A4K · 10-22-12, 09:21 PM

Originally posted by 757sFinest

bad weather has nothing to do with the under. Unless there is strong wind I think it is a mute point.

M-O-O-T point is the word we were looking for.

Bluedragon · 10-22-12, 09:25 PM

straight cash

No coincidences · 10-22-12, 09:27 PM

Originally posted by StackinGreen

I called this result last Monday, foolz

proper respect where due

You are like Goat's posting doppelganger.

lakerboy · 10-22-12, 10:10 PM

Should cash.

2daBank · 10-22-12, 10:13 PM

Originally posted by No coincidences

You don't get what I'm saying. I think it's going to go over.

one day you will have to explain to me how the hell you put a total 4 points under the number and lean over? we agreed on number only diff is when i think a total 4 points to high i play the under, why bother setting a number if you decide to psychoanalyze why the number is where it is instead of playing a line you feel is off?

No coincidences · 10-22-12, 10:17 PM

Originally posted by 2daBank

one day you will have to explain to me how the hell you put a total 4 points under the number and lean over? we agreed on number only diff is when i think a total 4 points to high i play the under, why bother setting a number if you decide to psychoanalyze why the number is where it is instead of playing a line you feel is off?

Because NFL lines are razor sharp, and I figured they posted it above 45 for a reason. Like I said, CHI/DET games are typically in the 42-44 range. Have no idea why this particular game opened at 47.5.

ermzzy · 10-22-12, 10:19 PM

this easily going to cash, detroits O-LINE is horrible good god,

lakerboy · 10-22-12, 10:21 PM

No coin you always overreact to what lines are . Bears and lions had lots of points type of offense so they set the line that way.

No coincidences · 10-22-12, 10:22 PM

Originally posted by lakerboy

No coin you always overreact to what lines are . Bears and lions had lots of points type of offense so they set the line that way.

That wasn't the case a year ago, when it was 42 in Chicago?

Bears have arguably the top defense in the NFL, yet they hang a 47.5 here?

I'm always overreacting to where lines are placed?

No coincidences · 10-22-12, 10:24 PM

Anyway, I didn't even bet this total. Just surprised at where it was, that's all.

2daBank · 10-22-12, 10:24 PM

Originally posted by No coincidences

Because NFL lines are razor sharp, and I figured they posted it above 45 for a reason. Like I said, CHI/DET games are typically in the 42-44 range. Have no idea why this particular game opened at 47.5.

i prefer actually capping over tin foil conspiracies,,,that just me tho...

No coincidences · 10-22-12, 10:27 PM

Originally posted by lakerboy

Have not seen juice on a total like this in a while.
Not a good sign.

Did you not say this earlier LB?

No coincidences · 10-22-12, 10:27 PM

Originally posted by 2daBank

i prefer actually capping over tin foil conspiracies,,,that just me tho...

Where did I say there was a conspiracy?

Matt1144 · 10-22-12, 10:32 PM

Weather had a lot to do with this game. Huge difference between a dry climate and one that has been having rain ALL day. I live 15 minutes from Soldier Field and the under was the only option. Given it is actually very warm (and not even for Chicagoans but it was a very awesome day temperature wise minus the rain) the rain had a lot to do with it. You add a wet all day atmosphere to that absolutely horrid field that no one like to play on at Soldier Field and it was a no brainer. Of course betting it is a different story

I rather had stayed with Bears ML for assurance anyway

lakerboy · 10-22-12, 10:33 PM

No bears ml was -275 or so. Under was -107. U always win taking the under.

No coincidences · 10-22-12, 10:35 PM

Originally posted by lakerboy

No bears ml was -275 or so. Under was -107. U always win taking the under.

What?

crustyme · 10-22-12, 10:37 PM

screenshot or was it cancelled?

Matt1144 · 10-22-12, 10:41 PM

Originally posted by lakerboy

No bears ml was -275 or so. Under was -107. U always win taking the under.

After some of the stellar picks I've seen you have claimed to be locks I'm just going to ignore that and know I made the right move. I personally hate totals and I know the ML was juiced (I got -260 btw) but no need to talk shit. A win is a win. I know my team. Cheers.

leetreaper · 10-22-12, 10:58 PM

lakerboy · 10-22-12, 10:59 PM

Originally posted by Smoke

U truly are a retard.