Rams ml over packers

[2daBank]

STL homer touting the rams wow--GB's D has given a whopping 4 more redzone pts than STL in the exact same number of scoring drives.that's 1 more td & 1 fewer fg---I guess STL's redzone d is nothing to talk about either.
Now STL's passing D is quite good until you realise they have played 1 team in the top 10 of passing(yds/gm).The DET lions.Not much to hang your hat really.

everyone on this site that knows me knows i am completely unbiased about the rams and have no problem betting against them as ive done several times this season and quite often in years past (unlike you who since coming to this site have done nothing but spew homer bs)...gb has allowed tds 64% of the time when teams get in the red zone which ranks in the bottom 3rd of the league which one would think might allow stl to do a better job of punching one in instead of settling like they typically do, stl 47% of the time,,id say that significant,,,doesnt really matter who stl has played if you think they dont have a solid pass defense you are proving you know less about fb than i previously suspected,,,and if we basing everything off who they have played then maybe stl red zone offense isnt as horrible as i said as they have played a lot of very good defensive teams, although i know it doesnt matter cause fact is they struggle in red zone period, their only hope is that gb allows tds in the red zone at a high clip comparatively to rest of league... lastly i by no means was "touting" or even suggesting a play on stl was the right move, maybe you have as much a problem with reading comprehension as you do understanding the game?

[GamblerSpirit]

fools still sleeping on Rams D... should be a good game.

Whats so good about their defense?

[ngates815]

Whats so good about their defense?

6 of em have aids.


Packers win by 15.

[2daBank]

6 of em have aids.


Packers win by 15.

damn they been playing pretty well for having the aids,,then again magic has that shit and he looks healthier than most this forum..

[dymd3z]

yeah, rolling with the Pack, they will win by 10+.. may even throw a little on the Over too.

[Smogs]

This will be very close to cashing or will cash. It was +4.5 before game tonight. Last year rams played pack tough in lambeau despite score. Fisher will make bigger impact this year.

Can't agree, Packers have all the advantages, this will be a 38-10 score

[ngates815]

damn they been playing pretty well for having the aids,,then again magic has that shit and he looks healthier than most this forum..

Aids is deceiving nowadays...Can still perform with it, but won't help when the people from the frozen tundra come to town!

[2daBank]

Aids is deceiving nowadays...Can still perform with it, but won't help when the people from the frozen tundra come to town!

i think it be a little more competitive than a lot think,,in the end gb will win and whether they cover i think is close, really depends on whether rams can convert scoring chances into tds which they are terrible at, but id expect them to eat some clock and force gb to work for the points, they will die a slow death rather than let rodgers destroy them over the top and the corners are capable, think cobb will have a big gm underneath, if finley wasnt a whiny ball dropping bitch he would have a big gm as well,,,long as rodgers takes what they give him instead of forcing things all stl can do is slow them down... i put gb in the 24-27 point range and stl between 16-20,,which is a play or 2 either way from who covers...then again wouldnt be the 1st and wont be the last time i am wrong...

[t-wizzle]

Everyone back on the Pack bandwagon. Perfect spot to fade them. They might not lose but taking the 5 here is the play for sure. Green Bay still has flaws.

[JR007]

7-0 last 7 posted NFL picks. so much confusion by retards here.

understatement of the year , Good luck LB

[freakydave]

rams will play this gm way closer than most expect,,hell the ppl talking about how pack whipped stl last yr just looking at score, rams played well in that gm just struggled in red zone but they moved ball up and down field,,,this stl team is much better than last yrs and presents some problems for gb,,,the front 4 can get pressure w/o blitzing and the secondary is one of the better ones in the league, rodgers will have to be content taking the short stuff cause he wont be beating them deep very often.... offensively rams have struggled to run at times but they will have a ton of attempts which is often enough, not to mention they ran well in 2nd half on zona and went to mia and posted another respectable rushing gm (not easy to do), yes they struggled early but the oline had to deal with a lot of changes and it is clear they are being coached up and coming together quite well..last week i think was Bradfords most impressive gm as a pro and he has def showed signs this yr of being the guy they drafted 1 overall....fisher will scheme the d and make rodgers work for every yard and this gm will still be in question into the 4th qrtr,,,the biggest problem in this gm for stl is they are gonna have to convert redzone chances into tds as trading fgs against pack tds will get them beat, gb red zone d is nothing to brag about and maybe that helps rams punch a extra 1 in instead of settling for fgs,,,i think in the end gb finds a way to win but it wont be easy..personally i like stl and under teased... gl lb

like i said before--Are you not on STL? like I said before are you not claiming STL's secondary is "one of the better ones in the league"? When the only decent passing team they played is DET & that game they lost.I don't believe I have reading comprehension problem at all.

[Goat Milk]

Everyone back on the Pack bandwagon. Perfect spot to fade them. They might not lose but taking the 5 here is the play for sure. Green Bay still has flaws.

How many times are you gonna use that same logic? Shit teams like arizona and the rams and the seahawks are gonna be brought back down to reality eventually. none will make playoffs guaranteed.

[lakerboy]

Goat sea is not a shit team.

[sneakerhead]

Goat only bets on the "elite" teams

[StackinGreen]

I've been hot as well lately, I like Pack. Could get blown up, but odds are more likely that the best QB in the game has hit his stride.

[2daBank]

like i said before--Are you not on STL? like I said before are you not claiming STL's secondary is "one of the better ones in the league"? When the only decent passing team they played is DET & that game they lost.I don't believe I have reading comprehension problem at all.

you right i figured out the problem, you a fukkin moron...

[freakydave]

you right i figured out the problem, you a fukkin moron...

Nice rebuttal

GL to you

[psufan]

Aarron Rodgers will have a helluva game. Rams can play some D but they won't keep up with the Packers.. td cover easily I believe

[epr038]

Packers just lost 2 weeks ago on a trap game to Indy. Its still fresh on their minds... Wont happen again here.

[ermzzy]

only way they keep it close is if REFEREE penetrate them over

[chantrain]

I just took rams spread. Rams ML is way too hardcore for me bro.

But I like the spread, I agree that the rams have a good chance

[pick4player]

28-13 packers...and you can discount double check that

[Demonata]

The packers beat the undefeated texans in Houston. Rodgers throws for 6 tds on that defense that is better than the Rams. He should of won against the Seahawks on the road who has an amazing defense too but they called the interception a td. Yet people think the packers are going to struggle against the rams? The packers need every win from here on out. They will come out focused and should cover -5. Rams going to keep up with packers in a shootout? I doubt it.

[ermzzy]

Rams can't run the ball, when packer score 2 td they will panic, thier defense is not better then packers offesen.

[falcon44]

Agree this is a great play today!

[linedrivr]

I have banked several times this season backing the Rams at home as underdogs (Was & Sea). I just can't back them today in this spot.

Unless the Rams D just stifles Green bay's offense (unlikely), I honestly just don't see Bradford & co. being able to keep pace with Green bay in scoring. Especially without Amendola to check down to.

[HOT WINGS]

Rams +5 is my fav play today. GL think ML has good chance

[BigDeem5]

You cancel this one too lb?

[Chili_Powder]

Look at the bright side Lakerboy, at least you didn't bet real money.

[GamblerSpirit]

Everyone back on the Pack bandwagon. Perfect spot to fade them. They might not lose but taking the 5 here is the play for sure. Green Bay still has flaws.

Another loser brought to you by t-shizzle-wizzle-im-a-dumbfuck-pizzle

As for faggotboy, he bets air anyways loss or win it's irrelevant

[detroitlionsfan]

this just got interesting ...

[ronzer]

[lakerboy]

Loss.

[freakydave]

everyone on this site that knows me knows i am completely unbiased about the rams and have no problem betting against them as ive done several times this season and quite often in years past (unlike you who since coming to this site have done nothing but spew homer bs)...gb has allowed tds 64% of the time when teams get in the red zone which ranks in the bottom 3rd of the league which one would think might allow stl to do a better job of punching one in instead of settling like they typically do, stl 47% of the time,,id say that significant,,,doesnt really matter who stl has played if you think they dont have a solid pass defense you are proving you know less about fb than i previously suspected,,,and if we basing everything off who they have played then maybe stl red zone offense isnt as horrible as i said as they have played a lot of very good defensive teams, although i know it doesnt matter cause fact is they struggle in red zone period, their only hope is that gb allows tds in the red zone at a high clip comparatively to rest of league... lastly i by no means was "touting" or even suggesting a play on stl was the right move, maybe you have as much a problem with reading comprehension as you do understanding the game?

rodgers 300+ yds 3td's RAMS secondary not very good after all.Rams supposedly great d outplayed by GB's supposedly middle of pack D.

[Mikail]

still trying to look sharp eh?