A Few RAzor Sharp Ex Posters On Oakland Tonight -133

[zoo youk]

I'd be very careful here Sanchez is a high strike out pitcher and has been lights out past month hence Leland giving him start over scherzer. Oakland lead MLB in strike outs you saw what happened game 1 verlander 11 ks Oakland couldn't get going

[jjgold]

Pick came from approx $150,000 worth of posters bankrolls

[Bostongambler]

Thought you were using east coast slang there Gater....Oak 6-7 Det

Thats how we used to give the lines out. Damm, haven't heard that in years.

[ngates815]

Pick came from approx $150,000 worth of posters bankrolls

So what you're saying is this is mathdotcums comeback play. We all know how sharp that guy is.

[BIGDAY]

Coach, I'll POUND it.

[ngates815]

Coach, I'll POUND it.

[BIGDAY]

[wantitall4moi]

'ex-posters' i.e. fishhead and Mathdotcom, maybe air lemart too.

of course in name only since we all know these guys have ghosts upon ghosts, so 'ex-poster' is probably a misnomer.

[jjgold]

Big Bankrolls usually equate to sharps

thats all I am saying

[Okiejoe]

sharps played reds -139

[wantitall4moi]

sharps played reds -139

LMAO just stop, you are really clueless.

Why would any so called sharp take a game -139 that OPENED -137? And it even got to -135 at a few places.

I know youre just a ghost of some loser who lost a "I will quit' bet but this persona isnt fairing any better.

100 posts most of them trolling people or being a complete douche, the few others basically showing you dont have a real clue as to anything that you claim is important. Namely odds, and line moves. You post up horrible numbers claiming sharps were on them, then they end up moving the opposite way which most definitely shows no big money was going that direction.

Only positive is this name has existed for 6 weeks so it wont belong until you need to make up another name to keep posting here.

[ngates815]

Big Bankrolls usually equate to sharps

thats all I am saying

Maybe sharps in life...that doesn't roll over into gambling.

That's what I'm saying.

[jjgold]

If you do not beat closer you cannot win at sportsbetting

mathematically proven

[No coincidences]

Do you guys think it is a sharp play??

Brock does.

[wantitall4moi]

If you do not beat closer you cannot win at sportsbetting

mathematically proven

stop talking stupid. I am probably the ony guy who can tarck opener, closers, and best available and I can tell that is total bullshit.

[jjgold]

Wanty I have info on this game from ex sbr sharps
Of course the game can lose

All I do is relay shit to SBR Players

I am like a beard in so many words or a middle man

[No coincidences]

If you do not beat closer you cannot win at sportsbetting

mathematically proven

Well it wouldn't be that hard, given the line is currently -131/-132.

[ngates815]

If you do not beat closer you cannot win at sportsbetting

mathematically proven

I thought if you do not pick winners you cannot win at sportsbetting.

I can beat the closing price every night...but I still have to be on the right side. You do know there is 2 closing lines that you can beat....

Please show me where the research is done that the only thing that matters is beating the closing line.

[jjgold]

Nicky Santoro the sharpest man ever at sbr said that

He said long term if you do not beat closers 100% you lose

If I bet Giants on a regular basis 1 point against me vs closer how do you win?????????

[No coincidences]

I thought if you do not pick winners you cannot win at sportsbetting.

I can beat the closing price every night...but I still have to be on the right side. You do know there is 2 closing lines that you can beat....

Please show me where the research is done that the only thing that matters is beating the closing line.

You can beat Pinny's closing line at a rec. book 99 plays out of 100 without doing a single second of capping.

[blue.eyed.tuna]

Detroit wins 4-2

[wantitall4moi]

I thought if you do not pick winners you cannot win at sportsbetting.

I can beat the closing price every night...but I still have to be on the right side. You do know there is 2 closing lines that you can beat....

Please show me where the research is done that the only thing that matters is beating the closing line.

Its always predicated that yu have to beat the 'sharp' closing number. Meaning whatever way the line moves the most. Which is as I said total bullshit.

This whole beating the closing number is just another tout pitch to make people think they have some quick and easy way to win.

I showed you all that there have only been 147 individual games out of about 4500 where even getting the BEST number mattered, that isnt even the closing number. But of those 147 games there were more than a few where both sides won. But it still didnt change the number of games just the number of sides.

So it goes both ways.

The closer isnt the best number 85% of the time so always claiming you need to beat the closer is just retarded based on that fact alone.

[Checkerboard]

Last Friday jj wins top sportsbook and top casino.

1439 points from sportsbook and exact same number 1439 points from casino.

[jjgold]

Mods delete checkerboards post now

Guys all I do is try to help

Should I release who gave me this expert pick

they had inside info

All I do is help here

[Bostongambler]

Printing $$$$$$

[PAYTON20]

Play won so really nobody can talk shit

[Checkerboard]

Mods delete checkerboards post now

Guys all I do is try to help

Should I release who gave me this expert pick

they had inside info

All I do is help here

jj, sorry for confusion -- just thought it was cool from the coincidence of 2 x 1439 numerological point of view.

[jjgold]

Checkers I got power players that report to me

[flyboy]

Thanks JJ !!!