Any big dogs on the ML in NFL?

[Panic]

I was gonna take a shot with the Rams @+355, but with Jackson doubtful, that's probably just throwing money away.....although I still think the Jets are not a good team. Instead I am going with the Lions to get their first win against the lame ass Jags.(If Cincy can do it, so can Detroit). How bad would that be? The Jags lose in back to back weeks to the only 2 winless teams in the league. I'm going to take the Lions @+252. Any others out there worth looking at?

[gummo]

I played seahawks +300 for a slice.

[bigboydan]

The biggest ML dog I'm taking this week is the Giants and the next one is Green Bay. I just can't take Detroit, Oakland, or the Chiefs at all.

[bigboydan]

I played seahawks +300 for a slice.

I'm actually probably going to lay the 8 with the fish sir.

[Panic]

I'm really liking this Detroit ML, BBD The Jags are horrible. I think Detroit gets their first win here...at home nonetheless.


gummo- I cant ever take the Seahawks. I hate the walrus.

[SportsLockPicks]

if you can get a ml on the chiefs (i know, but you asked) reason is, they are playing a new offensive scheme and finding more comfortable plays instead of forcing...plus, they have NOTHING to lose at this point...don't be suprised if they are at least in it until the end...this will be at least close

[RogueScholar]

It's not a generous card this week, and all I have to offer is Green Bay and Buffalo, and it's light on Buffalo to boot.

[laxdjock]

NYG at 135-140 is a solid bet.

[The Seer]

I'm actually probably going to lay the 8 with the fish sir.

love Miami tomorrow.

[MonkeyF0cker]

I'm against BBD on every one of his plays mentioned in this thread, playing Seattle, Minnesota, and Philly ATS. I'm not finding any great value this week in big dogs on the ML. However, I'm big on two smaller dogs this week, both on the ML and ATS: Chicago and Buffalo. GL this week.

[LT Profits]

I agree with Lions, and I think Rams have shot too.

Can't play Seattle at all though, they fit the West Coast team at 1:00 ET angle, and they are 2-12 under Holmgren in these early games.

[gm2022]

No Jackson, fk it lay the pts on the Rams and small play on Ml as well!

[LT Profits]

No Jackson, fk it lay the pts on the Rams and small play on Ml as well!

And terrible situational spot for Jets too, coming off big road win at Buffalo and with New England next on THURSDAY night.

That said, I prefer the Under here.

[treece]

Put your life savings on the Lions +7.

[LT Profits]

Put your life savings on the Lions +7.

Only saw a +7 -125 at the time of my post, +6.5 -105 is better. That is equivalent to +7 -118ish, so if anyone can find +7 -115, I would highly recommend it.

[Panic]

I'm liking this even more now....with LT and treece on board.

[blackNgoldjuice]

Got the Lions plus 7 at -110.

Playing so far....

GB ML
Ravens -1.5
KC plus 14.5
Leaning ATL -1

[SportsLockPicks]

if you can get a ml on the chiefs (i know, but you asked) reason is, they are playing a new offensive scheme and finding more comfortable plays instead of forcing...plus, they have NOTHING to lose at this point...don't be suprised if they are at least in it until the end...this will be at least close

i have totally changed my opinion on this game..i honestly do not see ANY dogs over 4 points winning outright today..i really don't, which is really odd

[SBR Lou]

Colts ML.

[Patrick McIrish]

Raiders

[Panic]

You like the Raiders, PM? That team has looked absolutley horrible the last 2 weeks.

[onlooker]

Not a big dog, but I really like the Packers to win in Minnesota today. Packers ML will probably be my only bet today.

Good luck everyone.

[yisman]

do not touch the Rams.

I got Raiders +390

[yisman]

Detroit +230 also could hit

[Panic]

Detroit +230 also could hit

That's the one I'm on. I got 'em @+252 last night. Didnt touch the Rams.

[laxdjock]

I still like the Gmen, I put 6 total on the ML. Obviously not a "big" dog, but winnable.