Originally <a href='/showthread.php?p=16080328'>posted</a> on 09/19/2012:
SBJ,
For the last time already, the amount wagered by my mother is no longer in question. She already has something to lose by the arbitrator ruling against her. Since if she loses the arbitration she will no longer have a claim to money she already won. Dont insult everyone's intelligence by ignoring the fact that my mother's account was on SBR's sheet and that SBR is only looking out for the sponsor's best interest. How come Heritage isnt proposing this? I thought SBR is neutral? I sense hostility by the owner of this site. I thought SBR is suppose to help posters solve issues not create them?
SBJ,
For the last time already, the amount wagered by my mother is no longer in question. She already has something to lose by the arbitrator ruling against her. Since if she loses the arbitration she will no longer have a claim to money she already won. Dont insult everyone's intelligence by ignoring the fact that my mother's account was on SBR's sheet and that SBR is only looking out for the sponsor's best interest. How come Heritage isnt proposing this? I thought SBR is neutral? I sense hostility by the owner of this site. I thought SBR is suppose to help posters solve issues not create them?