SUNDAY, 9/16
Colts +105 ML (5 Dimes)
MONDAY, 9/17
Broncos +3.5 -124 (Heritage)
YTD: 4-1, +2.90
Colts +105 ML (5 Dimes)
MONDAY, 9/17
Broncos +3.5 -124 (Heritage)
YTD: 4-1, +2.90
-
-
With ya on the colts, also like STL this weekend +ptsComment -
2 Sunday Additions
SUNDAY, 9/16
Colts +105 ML (5 Dimes)
Chiefs +3.5 -123 (Heritage)
Jaguars +7.5 -115 (Rebate Wager)
MONDAY, 9/17
Broncos +3.5 -124 (Heritage)Comment -
Like all of those bets.Originally posted by LT Profits
But I might opt for Broncos ML and Chiefs ML if I touch those games.Comment -
San francisco .......
They win this game 93x out of 100....
Im 'key'ing' this game at 0.5 with 6 games teased (all 2 gamers)vs the -320 which the line has moved to...
They made 'captain rodgers' anxious, in his backyard !!
Might i remind you that green bay has lost 1 in last 20 at home !! Not inc. Playoffs...
Defensive technique and pressure detroit will endure harshly at primetime this sunday
detroit , no mobility in pocket, fresh gore, manningham, and moss,
they make statement to the world,
san fran wins handidly,Comment -
Meaning there's value for you at any book odds -1328 or betterOriginally posted by PRIMO99
(don't mind me, Primo...I'm just being silly...and a calculator was unfortunately nearby)Comment -
1 Sunday Add
SUNDAY, 9/16
Colts +105 ML (5 Dimes)
Chiefs +3.5 -123 (Heritage)
Jaguars +7.5 -115 (Rebate Wager)
Redskins / Rams UNDER 44 -110 (5 Dimes)
MONDAY, 9/17
Broncos +3.5 -124 (Heritage)Comment -
Very interesting picks, not what I would have expected at allComment -
Lock: 0-5
This idiot LT don't know shit about NFL.. or any other sports...Comment -
Originally posted by daimoshokage Show me one losing record right now. 4-1 in NFL, 11-8 in CFB, +46.32 in MLB. Hmmmm?
Comment -
why do you respond to that fukken moron?Originally posted by LT Profits Show me one losing record right now. 4-1 in NFL, 11-8 in CFB, +46.32 in MLB. Hmmmm?Comment -
yeah that guy is an idiot LT, but I see you like Jax +7.5....that worries me I have Houston -1.5 at the end of a two team teaser (had Baltimore teased to -1) for a nice chunk of change....anyway JAX wins outright and I lose my teaser???Comment -
Not impossible for Texans to lose outright, but I don't think they will. Still, just that doubt would prevent me from teasing them.Originally posted by dmiles1021Comment -
Another Sunday Addition
SUNDAY, 9/16
Colts +105 ML (5 Dimes)
Chiefs +3.5 -123 (Heritage)
Jaguars +7.5 -115 (Rebate Wager)
Texans / Jaguars UNDER 41 -110 (Bookmaker)
Redskins / Rams UNDER 44 -110 (5 Dimes)
MONDAY, 9/17
Broncos +3.5 -124 (Heritage)Comment -
LT only takes dogs and unders
Anyone can make money doing that shit.
Take every under with a little bit of line shopping and you cant lose...Comment -
Originally posted by Rich Boy Ah, if it were only that simple.
Comment -
Great thesis for a research project. Backtest it thoroughly for the last several seasons, and report back to us...errr...major complication: that "little bit of line shopping" is impossible to quantify as it's an acquired art...Originally posted by Rich Boy
Guess you're down to "putting up or shutting up" (more formally known in academics as "action research")...do it & document it for an ENTIRE MLB season and report back to us (about 13 months from now) on just how easy/profitable it is...
_____________
"Any jackass can kick at a barn door...it takes a carpenter to build it."Comment -
History doesnt lie guy, unders in every sport are money cant fkn loseComment -
...agreed...as are dogs...the only problem is how to operationalize and capitalize on that general observation in the real world with real "numbers-of-games-in-the-day-to-follow/time-in-the-day-to-do-it/money-in-the-accounts-to-play-them-all" constraints...Originally posted by Rich Boy
capiche?...it's not nearly as easy as it sounds...so, i repeat my challenge...
if you think it's so easy...then, do it/document it/report your results...
till then refrain from naive "it's so easy...all you have to do is______" musings...
if you start a thread, i'll follow with interest
___________
"It's so easy to make money in business...ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS....buy low/sell hi...collect early/pay late...etc. etc."...easy to say, hard (not impossible...just HARD=the exact opposite of "easy") to operationalizeComment -
Originally posted by Rich Boy
Comment -
Prick likes over in the Wash game from what I remember.
I usually like your picks LT. I'm kind of confused on this card, and just haven't done enough research to feel comfortable on any game.
I think A.P. is still healthy, so I would lean more on Minny until Indy gets more comfortable w/their new team.
I also feel the same way w/ATL. Anyways, best of luck.
Keep them picks coming
Comment -
Here is some analysis. http://www.sbrforum.com/nfl-football...eek-2-a-26579/Originally posted by TimmayPrick likes over in the Wash game from what I remember.
I usually like your picks LT. I'm kind of confused on this card, and just haven't done enough research to feel comfortable on any game.
I think A.P. is still healthy, so I would lean more on Minny until Indy gets more comfortable w/their new team.
I also feel the same way w/ATL. Anyways, best of luck.
Keep them picks comingComment -
Are you worried about no Dwight Freeney or do you think Pagano's scheme can compensate? The man-to-man approach in the secondary is so completely different than what we've seen from IND's defense in quite some time. Indy certainly could be undervalued ...
I like the Jags in week 1, but no Smith, Cox on D and missing 3 starters on O-line? Not sure they can get away with that against Texans.
Really like KC and DEN picks...I'm surprised books allowed us the hook at an affordable price.Comment -
Winners?Comment -
Chiefs season will end if they don't win on Sunday.
Don't look good right now.Comment -
Agree I think KC is in a semi-must-win situation if they hope to be relevant this season. Their division is too tough to let games like this slide. Having Flowers and Hali back is HUGE. No Jones and Jackson hurts an already erratic offense too. KC wins this game as long as Cassel doesn't feel the need to be a hero...Originally posted by k13Comment -
If they lose they have @Saints, San Diego, Baltimore, @tampa, oakland, @SD, @Pit, looks ugly.Originally posted by bobbyk1133
I think Bills win still somehow.Comment -
Feeling the colts a lot too, getting +115, how are vikings even favoured??Comment -
you always bet the stupidest gamesCause Sleep is the Cousin of DeathComment -
Yep, that's why I usually finish + units.Originally posted by Goat Milk And what exactly are the stupid games?
Comment -
Chiefs had 5 guys inactive on defense last week, there is a chance all 5 could play this week but the 2 most important ones will definitely play. Offense was actually OK vs. Atlanta, almost 400 yards. Was 20-17 at half before lack of defensive depth caught up vs. Falcons' hurry-up.Originally posted by k13Comment -
You guys like Indy that much? I can't see how people can't see Minny being a 2 pt. favorite here.
Way more believable than Indy being like a 3 pt fave. I think the number is spot on.
Isn't A.P. playing? Vikings should win by 9-10???Comment -
the guy s winning and people are still pissed, go figure.Comment -
Why are colts +140 now??????Comment -
Wish I would have waited. Apparently a lot of people share the sentiment of some posters here.Originally posted by Vinnie PazComment
