The hot offenses:
Packers out.
Saints out.
Lions out.
The sexy defenses:
Niners in.
Giants in.
Ravens in.
Coincidence?
Packers out.
Saints out.
Lions out.
The sexy defenses:
Niners in.
Giants in.
Ravens in.
Coincidence?
-
-
Not only. Also a proof that Green Bay never had 15-1 quality. Seeing what the refs did for Green Bay to win, I'm asking myself how many of those 15 wins were actually earned.
Overrated and arrogant team. Lost money, but still happy that I won't see that arrogant Discount Double Check bum's face in the playoffs.Comment -
yep, Pats lucky to face the 2011 version of the 2010 seahawks
Comment -
not really,
green bay didnt exactly have a defense last year,
nor did new orleans the year before that,
nor did arizona when they made it to the super bowl the year before that
...
..
and realistally speaking, new orleans and green bay both shot themselves in the foot through turnovers (of which most were careless fumbles)
if anything this years playoffs proves that you cant turn the ball over 5 times and win a game, something which is pretty obvious to begin with.Comment -
turnovers are not just bad luck, great defenses create turnovers.Comment -
huego , that was true a few years ago , not today n.o. played a better game they lost because of turnovers. g.b. dropped a million balls thats why they loss, lions played well denvers off. out played them . a blanket stament as defense wins is not true anymore , the pats could and probably will win it off great off. bad d superbowl winnersComment