Originally posted by No coincidences
StL/SEA total plays
Collapse
X
-
Goat MilkBARRELED IN @ SBR!- 03-24-10
- 25850
#71the over was getting steamed all day at every book.Cause Sleep is the Cousin of DeathComment -
PAULYPOKERBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 12-06-08
- 36581
#72I mis read, I thought you were saying the game was going to be underOriginally posted by Goat Milkyes pauly. it was foreseen
Comment -
Petenana15Restricted User
- 03-07-11
- 1441
#73Niceeeeeee im outComment -
mlbSBR Posting Legend
- 12-04-09
- 10509
#74What the fuk....... I am getting hammered on these stupid stand alone games.... last week lions with all their penalties and then just roll over on their last drive, lost all 3 bets then pass on sand diego and then dominate and then last night Dallas Dallas ml and over and Dallas blows a 12 point lead under 4 minutes to go and now this shit.... st Louis just lets Seattle score last possession and then sits on the ball.at tie endComment -
Goat MilkBARRELED IN @ SBR!- 03-24-10
- 25850
#75ha 12/16 75% against the spread on every nfl play this week posted well before kickoff just for opie. thanks opiumCause Sleep is the Cousin of DeathComment -
Love The ActionSBR Posting Legend
- 11-08-10
- 10952
#76Originally posted by No coincidencesIt's not about how it gets there LTA -- only that it gets there.
How many times are you going to get screwed on an otherwise perfectly-capped total before you realize you're betting on rigged numbers?
What does that even mean? Who's "rigging" the numbers? The Vegas boogie man? It's all a fix, huh. Dude, it's statements like that which affect your credibility.
The NFL is a game of inches completely dependent upon key numbers. It's all about a few plays here or there that completely decide a game above or below certain key numbers based on scoring coming in on mostly 3's and 7's. In this game, if that blocked punt never happens, the under hits. Does that mean your "rigged" numbers weren't rigged?
I can go find any number of games last weekend or the weekend before that had similar line movement but the game didn't cash.Comment -
Goat MilkBARRELED IN @ SBR!- 03-24-10
- 25850
#77If they don't block that punt, they most likely get the ball around the 50 yard line and end up with a fg anyway, where the under would still lose at 90% of books.Originally posted by Love The Action
What does that even mean? Who's "rigging" the numbers? The Vegas boogie man? It's all a fix, huh. Dude, it's statements like that which affect your credibility. The NFL is a game of inches completely dependent upon key numbers. It's all about a few plays here or there that completely decide a game above or below certain key numbers based on scoring coming in on mostly 3's and 7's. In this game, if that blocked punt never happens, the under hits. Does that mean your "rigged" numbers weren't rigged? I can go find any number of games last weekend or the weekend before that had similar line movement but the game didn't cash.
you would have pushed prollyCause Sleep is the Cousin of DeathComment -
Love The ActionSBR Posting Legend
- 11-08-10
- 10952
#78The number was adjusted in favor of the over and for the Rams because Bradford was announced as a starter. That's expected as an adjustment, not steam. Are you kidding me. Geezus....Originally posted by Goat Milkthe over was getting steamed all day at every book.
The number went from 10 to 8 but the Rams didn't cover. So I guess only the over had "true" steam huh and only the over was rigged
Comment -
No coincidencesSBR Aristocracy
- 01-18-10
- 76300
#79Honestly, LTA, how many times have you threatened to quit the NFL because of exactly what I'm saying? Now you're going to defend its legitimacy and credibility?Originally posted by Love The Action
What does that even mean? Who's "rigging" the numbers? The Vegas boogie man? It's all a fix, huh. Dude, it's statements like that which affect your credibility.
The NFL is a game of inches completely dependent upon key numbers. It's all about a few plays here or there that completely decide a game above or below certain key numbers based on scoring coming in on mostly 3's and 7's. In this game, if that blocked punt never happens, the under hits. Does that mean your "rigged" numbers weren't rigged?
I can go find any number of games last weekend or the weekend before that had similar line movement but the game didn't cash.
It's not that you aren't capping the games right -- I'll tell you that much.Comment -
Love The ActionSBR Posting Legend
- 11-08-10
- 10952
#80I'm just messing around bitching about the NFL. That shit's all in fun. The NFL is not "rigged" dude.Originally posted by No coincidencesHonestly, LTA, how many times have you threatened to quit the NFL because of exactly what I'm saying? Now you're going to defend its legitimacy and credibility?
It's not that you aren't capping the games right -- I'll tell you that much.
The move toward the over was a simple adjustment because of Bradford being announced as a starter. Read the comments from the Wynn's bookmaker at Covers. He backs up every word I say by saying that was an auto adjustment.
That's also why the Rams went from +10 to +8, however, they didn't cover. So are you saying only the total was rigged tonight and not the side? Or was the side rigged for Seattle?Comment -
ApricotSinner32Restricted User
- 11-28-10
- 10648
#81Refs were trying to help the rams cover all night... rams just played that bad to not make it happen. I'd imagine books took a small hit today... nice hit on the over.Comment -
No coincidencesSBR Aristocracy
- 01-18-10
- 76300
#82I'm just messing around too -- for the most part.Originally posted by Love The ActionI'm just messing around bitching about the NFL. That shit's all in fun. The NFL is not "rigged" dude.
The move toward the over was a simple adjustment because of Bradford being announced as a starter. Read the comments from the Wynn's bookmaker at Covers. He backs up every word I say by saying that was an auto adjustment.
That's also why the Rams went from +10 to +8, however, they didn't cover. So are you saying only the total was rigged tonight and not the side? Or was the side rigged for Seattle?
But remember, when it comes to the NFL, there are no coincidences. Just very, ummm, sharp lines.Comment -
Goat MilkBARRELED IN @ SBR!- 03-24-10
- 25850
#83I was not aware. I thought he was already starting. Makes sense then. Certain games are rigged in key scenarios in the nba. But they are important games and they rarely happen. O/U are rigged in the NBA only in cases where its a blowout and game is already out of hand, making it much less obvious.Originally posted by Love The ActionThe number was adjusted in favor of the over and for the Rams because Bradford was announced as a starter. That's expected as an adjustment, not steam. Are you kidding me. Geezus.... The number went from 10 to 8 but the Rams didn't cover. So I guess only the over had "true" steam huh and only the over was rigged
Cause Sleep is the Cousin of DeathComment -
No coincidencesSBR Aristocracy
- 01-18-10
- 76300
#84The move from +180 to +165 on the over 42.5 came well after the Bradford news surfaced.Originally posted by Goat MilkI was not aware. I thought he was already starting. Makes sense then. Certain games are rigged in key scenarios in the nba. But they are important games and they rarely happen. O/U are rigged in the NBA only in cases where its a blowout and game is already out of hand, making it much less obvious.
Hell, if anything, Bradford delayed this game from going over.Comment -
pacoSBR Aristocracy
- 05-07-09
- 62873
#85Comments like these are why guys argue with u. U went from saying this game will never go over, got some lucky stuff happen in the 4th and got the over (which im happy u did cuz I was on it also) just leave it at that,but then u go on to bring up how line moved from +180 - 160 blah blah. Line makers didnt score those td's. Not everything is rigged bro.Originally posted by No coincidencesThe move from +180 to +165 on the over 42.5 came well after the Bradford news surfaced.
Hell, if anything, Bradford delayed this game from going over.Comment -
No coincidencesSBR Aristocracy
- 01-18-10
- 76300
#86I didn't say everything was rigged. Not even close.Originally posted by pacoComments like these are why guys argue with u. U went from saying this game will never go over, got some lucky stuff happen in the 4th and got the over (which im happy u did cuz I was on it also) just leave it at that,but then u go on to bring up how line moved from +180 - 160 blah blah. Line makers didnt score those td's. Not everything is rigged bro.
As for this game, I'll leave it to everyone's own interpretation. I'll just say there was obviously some big money on both the traditional over and alternative over and leave it at that.Comment -
SteveRyanSBR MVP
- 11-15-11
- 1654
#87Nice picks coin. Even the push at +17Originally posted by No coincidencesAs for this game, I'll leave it to everyone's own interpretation. I'll just say there was obviously some big money on both the traditional over and alternative over and leave it at that.Comment -
No coincidencesSBR Aristocracy
- 01-18-10
- 76300
#88Thanks. It all worked out OK in the end (other than the two forced plays on the side).Originally posted by SteveRyanNice picks coin. Even the push at +17Comment -
bengals888SBR Sharp
- 09-27-07
- 272
#89
Comment
Search
Collapse
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
#1 BetMGM
4.8/5 BetMGM Bonus Code
#2 FanDuel
4.8/5 FanDuel Promo Code
#3 Caesars
4.8/5 Caesars Promo Code
#4 DraftKings
4.7/5 DraftKings Promo Code
#5 Fanatics
#6 bet365
4.7/5 bet365 Bonus Code
#7 Hard Rock
4.1/5 Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
#8 BetRivers
4.1/5 BetRivers Bonus Code
