The St. Louis Rams ARE that bad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • TehSharp
    SBR Wise Guy
    • 08-22-11
    • 704

    #1
    The St. Louis Rams ARE that bad
    These fukers lost me opportunities at so much money today on some HUGE parlays. How are you up 13-6 with under five minutes, get a fg blocked, not be able to score in OT after winning the toss and then can't make seven tackles and lose it to a punt return. Sam Bradford is a numbe rone overall pick bust and besides the Colts, they are the worst team in the league. And that is a
  • Ultimate_Marvel
    SBR Sharp
    • 08-21-11
    • 275

    #2
    The St Louis sheep skin condoms...are as bad as the Indianapolis Cokks....consider this a lesson learned...
    Comment
    • paranoyd androyd
      SBR Hall of Famer
      • 10-01-11
      • 6459

      #3
      no one bets anything material on the rams on the road
      Comment
      • TehSharp
        SBR Wise Guy
        • 08-22-11
        • 704

        #4
        It wasn't substantial, I had them +1.5 in a 3 team parlay with the Bengals +1.5 and Giants +9, which would have won me alot. Also, they were my one ML loss in a 6 team parlay. odds for both were 7/1 and 5/1. Just pisses me off that they had it in the bag and blew it big time.

        I mean they were going against the cardinals with john skelton at qb, you can't tell me that you thought they were going to lose
        Comment
        • ridims
          SBR MVP
          • 11-15-10
          • 3863

          #5
          They force two safety's and still lose?

          Pathetic
          Comment
          • TehSharp
            SBR Wise Guy
            • 08-22-11
            • 704

            #6
            I mean, I called them losing to the Skins earlier in the year and I bet the Colts would beat them in Indy. Write it down. All my friends from the STL area were talking so much crap about my Bears this year and saying they would get pounded by the Rams if they played. I know STL has had some injuries this year, but they had one of the better second half defenses last season, they have Lloyd and S Jax, but after two seasons, Bradford looks like a bust and Cam Newton looks better after 8 games. Can't believe I'm saying that but it's so true.
            Comment
            • tokio
              SBR MVP
              • 03-30-10
              • 2150

              #7
              Bradford sucks. He hit the rookie hill and is rolling down fast.
              Comment
              • paranoyd androyd
                SBR Hall of Famer
                • 10-01-11
                • 6459

                #8
                bradford way too small and soft and plays very scared
                Comment
                • iceminers26
                  SBR Posting Legend
                  • 10-13-08
                  • 15600

                  #9
                  They actually could have attempted a FG on 4th and 1 with about a minute left but they got stuffed and turned it over on downs. Don't ask me why the heck they didn't attempt the FG, think it was from 50 or 51. Was the most boring game of the day for 58 minutes but ended up being the most entertaining.
                  Comment
                  • TehSharp
                    SBR Wise Guy
                    • 08-22-11
                    • 704

                    #10
                    Originally posted by tokio
                    Bradford sucks. He hit the rookie hill and is rolling down fast.
                    Bet the Rams wish they could take back some of the 50 million guaranteed. They are stuck with him for 5 more years
                    Comment
                    Search
                    Collapse
                    SBR Contests
                    Collapse
                    Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                    Collapse
                    Working...