Pats would have been -7 vs. Raiders

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Sunde91
    SBR Hall of Famer
    • 11-26-09
    • 8325

    #1
    Pats would have been -7 vs. Raiders
    if they continued to roll Bills and Raiders lost to Jets. Now -4

    Last year Pats lost SU @Clev in week 9. They comeback the week after as 4.5 dogs @PITT. Joke line. If they hadn't lost @Cle it's +2.5 Pats. Public pounded Pats points and ML and they rolled 39-26.

    Pats will be extremely focused here coming off loss with the added urgency that they are tied for 2nd in their division and now playing a 2-1 team on the road. Just like last year after week 9 loss, Pats had lost the division lead. They responded then. Belli will hype the Raiders as contenders and overstress where they are in the division and will put together a gem gameplan.

    Raiders are not bad but not some legitimate team that is going to hang with the top 3 AFC East teams for 3 straight weeks. An unproven team with a 1st time head coach will crash Sunday after playing 3 good games to start the year.

    Who will be the first to say one of three words: trap, public, square? That's fine. Called playing value in a good situation where public sides win all the time. See Pats @PITT and Pats -3.5 roll Jets week 13 last year.
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
Working...