Lol @ the Pitt backers

[BigDofBA]

Since the one guy started a thread laughing at us winners, I might a well start one right back at him.

Pitt was such a sucker play.

They have numerous o-line injuries and the Colts can rush the passer. There was a reason the line didn't move much despite everyone being on the Steelers.

This is the NFL. The Colts have had a rough start but they still have pro players.

[Ricki Roma]

U trying to reverse jinx his jinx?

[BigDofBA]

No. I'm not into that Micky mouse bull shit.

I have Indy +12 third string QB and all.

[Pickem2win]

He just did because the Steelers just won! When will people learn?

[BigDofBA]

Umm no.

My god, I had Colts +12!!!! I dont care if they win.

[face]

thread sucks.

[BigDofBA]

I'm really just laughing at one guy that posted multiple threads about this game and how Pitt -10.5 was a lock.

[Coming Back!]

This thread is so bad, that this will be the last time I post outside of INDUSTRY NEWS. Too many losers posting stupid things. Pitt was a fraction of a second on two occassions of covering. Troy was still talking after the game about how he missed another forced fumble and potential TD. Come on dude. I'm done, thank you

[BigDofBA]

This thread is so bad, that this will be the last time I post outside of INDUSTRY NEWS. Too many losers posting stupid things. Pitt was a fraction of a second on two occassions of covering. Troy was still talking after the game about how he missed another forced fumble and potential TD. Come on dude. I'm done, thank you

By that logic I could say Indy was inches away from winning outright because Painter missed a wide open Garçon on what would have been a Sure TD.

You're assuming Pitt would have picked up a fumble that never happened and ran it all the way back for a TD.

Pitt won by three on the final play of the game and they were never covering the entire game. In fact, Pitt only led for 4 seconds in the second half. THANK YOu!

"Could have easy covered".

Colts could have easily won but instead they easily covered!