Giants ML -310...all in

Thurgood · 09-19-11, 04:56 PM

Admit it, you took the ML because you don't think the "G-MEN" can cover... Not an all-in play my friend.

Brutus84 · 09-19-11, 05:04 PM

True and not true. I took them -6.5 (bought down) to win $100 and 1800 to win 580 on the ML. I dont think they win 31-7 or something crazy like that. I look for a 27-14 type win or something like that. If there werent as many question marks the bet would have been spread out a little more evenly. I will admit the bet is stupid and gets people killed, but Im not too worried. I am not chasing money and can afford the loss if the unfortunate does happen. GL on whoever you take, if any team at all.

Thurgood · 09-19-11, 05:09 PM

Originally posted by Brutus84

True and not true. I took them -6.5 (bought down) to win $100 and 1800 to win 580 on the ML. I dont think they win 31-7 or something crazy like that. I look for a 27-14 type win or something like that. If there werent as many question marks the bet would have been spread out a little more evenly. I will admit the bet is stupid and gets people killed, but Im not too worried. I am not chasing money and can afford the loss if the unfortunate does happen. GL on whoever you take, if any team at all.

Jumped on the Rams at +8. Defense looked good last week and these MNF games are usually fought hard so I think it will be close. Not an all-in play for me though. BOL

Brutus84 · 09-19-11, 05:14 PM

That your girl on your avatar? She is beautiful. Well I will hope for a 7 pt victory.

DrStale · 09-19-11, 05:19 PM

Originally posted by Brutus84

Type of bet that will get someone killed....called a Brahma type play. Its not a pretty play, but it will pay me and thats all that matters. I think both teams are comparable assuming Jackson, Amendola, and Nicks are healthy. Assuming Jackson and Amendola are out and Nicks is playing and Giants are home...give me the G-MEN. Not to mention Giants need wins far worse then the Rams. Rams division sucks and can afford to go 0-2 and still win that division. GL everyone. Looking forward to ATL next week...not all in tho.

This kind of analysis is pretty bad. The Rams will be playing just as hard as the Giants from start to finish, theyre not going to go down a score and think "eh fukk it we'll just wait til next week since our schedule is so easy"

BOL. Im on the over.

Raven66 · 09-19-11, 05:21 PM

Originally posted by Brutus84

Type of bet that will get someone killed....called a Brahma type play. Its not a pretty play, but it will pay me and thats all that matters. I think both teams are comparable assuming Jackson, Amendola, and Nicks are healthy. Assuming Jackson and Amendola are out and Nicks is playing and Giants are home...give me the G-MEN. Not to mention Giants need wins far worse then the Rams. Rams division sucks and can afford to go 0-2 and still win that division. GL everyone. Looking forward to ATL next week...not all in tho.

St.Louis needs it more....with a win they are in first.

Raven66 · 09-19-11, 05:22 PM

Originally posted by DrStale

This kind of analysis is pretty bad. The Rams will be playing just as hard as the Giants from start to finish, theyre not going to go down a score and think "eh fukk it we'll just wait til next week since our schedule is so easy"

BOL. Im on the over.

lol....great minds i see.

Sweatyguido · 09-19-11, 05:25 PM

thats alot of juice to drink man. i never like moneyline bets on big favs. rather play a teaser with the over/under. in this case:
giants even over rams
over 38

and it pays out -120

Brutus84 · 09-19-11, 05:33 PM

My statement doesn't infer the Giants will play harder than the Rams. Albeit, the truth is the Rams have a much easier division and can afford to lose this game. They could easily win all 6 games against their division with some luck thrown in there. GL all.

Speedy88 · 09-19-11, 05:40 PM

Giants win this one. Rams are really overrated and I think the GMen are being a bit underestimated.

DrStale · 09-19-11, 05:44 PM

Actually thats exactly what your statement infers. The Giants cant afford to lose this game, the Rams can....what else would you be trying to infer?

Remember the last two years in December when everyone liked the Giants because they were in "must win" situations in order to make the playoffs and they completely collapsed? Cuz I do.

SATERSTYLE · 09-19-11, 05:44 PM

I think the giants most likely take this but at -310 i don't think it is worth it at all. I have the rams teased with the over... good luck

Brutus84 · 09-19-11, 06:17 PM

Well for starters everyone and their mama knows the NFC east is tougher than the NFC west. If the Rams are getting beat up badly (even though most likely isn't going to be the case) do you think the coach would further risk injuries by putting his team in situations that may not work for them? You may not factor certain things that I do when it involves my bets. GL to you but I believe Giants win easier than the final score may indicate.

D3 Mighty Ducks · 09-19-11, 06:20 PM

Ya, Thurgood, if that's your girl in your avatar I'm willing to pay

BallDontLie · 09-19-11, 06:31 PM

love the under here. Gmen are gonna focus on getting back their identity which is ground and pound running the ball down your throat to open up the playaction passing game that eli loves. I think that with Tuck back in the lineup their secondary wont be exploited as much as it was last week with a better pass rush.

Brutus84 · 09-19-11, 06:43 PM

Originally posted by D3 Mighty Ducks

Ya, Thurgood, if that's your girl in your avatar I'm willing to pay

If I win tonight, I might be willing to outbid you.

Thurgood · 09-19-11, 07:25 PM

Originally posted by Brutus84

If I win tonight, I might be willing to outbid you.

Lol, she's the 2008 America's Hottest College Girl winner on Collegehumor.com

Romocide · 09-19-11, 07:28 PM

A Rams win locks up 2 nice sized parlays for me. It will take a lot of luck for that to happen.

Brutus84 · 09-20-11, 12:05 PM

Originally posted by Brutus84

Well for starters everyone and their mama knows the NFC east is tougher than the NFC west. If the Rams are getting beat up badly (even though most likely isn't going to be the case) do you think the coach would further risk injuries by putting his team in situations that may not work for them? You may not factor certain things that I do when it involves my bets. GL to you but I believe Giants win easier than the final score may indicate.

Dr.Stale.....so how do you like this post now? Rams coach conceded game lol. Told you so. Punt.

DrStale · 09-20-11, 01:13 PM

Originally posted by Brutus84

Dr.Stale.....so how do you like this post now? Rams coach conceded game lol. Told you so. Punt.

Yeah, thats why the Rams lost. Cuz they punted down by 12 deep in their own end with no timeouts and about 70 seconds on the clock. I played and cashed the over, but as a side the Rams were the play, just didnt work out this time for those who bet 'em.

supr_villn · 09-20-11, 01:23 PM

Originally posted by DrStale

Yeah, thats why the Rams lost. Cuz they punted down by 12 deep in their own end with no timeouts and about 70 seconds on the clock. I played and cashed the over, but as a side the Rams were the play, just didnt work out this time for those who bet 'em.

um -> actually ?

the play ''is'' (always) the play
& the play never changes ..

STL had no shot ,,
not even @ ats

SUM
NEVER
LEARN

Brutus84 · 09-20-11, 02:56 PM

Originally posted by DrStale

Yeah, thats why the Rams lost. Cuz they punted down by 12 deep in their own end with no timeouts and about 70 seconds on the clock. I played and cashed the over, but as a side the Rams were the play, just didnt work out this time for those who bet 'em.

You missed my point. Both teams tried their hardest but in the end the coach virtually thru in the towel knowing there division sucks. You called me out earlier and I told u about giants needing it more than the rams. Hence coach giving up and punting....who does that?