Do you bet on NFL money lines?

[GunShard]

ATS is more profitable but I prefer to bet on the money line on a team that I know will completely dominate the other team.

[LT Profits]

Just the opposite, I bet ML dogs but almost never ML favorites

[MoneyLineDawg]

Just the opposite, I bet ML dogs but almost never ML favorites

ML Dogs is where its at in NFL........Thats what my Name is from......when I first started betting sports, on Bodog I hit a 4 team parlay of all Moneyline Dogs like a newb......shit got me hooked since then LOL

[Donkwin47]

I think in this NFL preseason it would be better to take the ML rather than the points on a small dog that you like, or at least mix both.

[MoneyLineDawg]

Just put a tiny parlay in of Broncos +125, seahawks +140, and cardinals +160

20 to win 260 for some action.......lets go boys

[MoneyLineDawg]

Anyone thinks that has a shot, LOL ^^^^

[BernardMadoff]

Anyone thinks that has a shot, LOL ^^^^

Don't think it'll happen but ya never know.

[MoneyLineDawg]

Don't think it'll happen but ya never know.

Yeah it's just a shot in the dark.....I'm up a ton the past few weeks and collecting tomorrow, whatever

[NardVa]

Money Line on favs sometimes to play it safe.

[Reno Gambler]

I like ML dogs
ATS if the price is good on the favorite

[MoneyLineDawg]

Just put a tiny parlay in of Broncos +125, seahawks +140, and cardinals +160

20 to win 260 for some action.......lets go boys

Not looking too bad right now......Cardinals gotta step it up!!!

[LT Profits]

Broncos ML cost me too.

Oh well, shit happens. I would make the same play again.

[Dark Horse]

If you prefer shit to be inexpensive, you can always divide the bet into ATS and ML, with the ATS win (for dogs) covering for the amount risked on the ML.

[GunShard]

If you prefer shit to be inexpensive, you can always divide the bet into ATS and ML, with the ATS win (for dogs) covering for the amount risked on the ML.

Yes, I bet on ML on favorites and ATS on underdogs, which is a good tactic.

[cant call it]

actually its more profitable to bet ML dogs than to pick sides

[Vuk]

nope

[MoneyLineDawg]

If you prefer shit to be inexpensive, you can always divide the bet into ATS and ML, with the ATS win (for dogs) covering for the amount risked on the ML.

I do a variation of this alot.....I'll make a big bet ATS and "sprinkle" a little on the ML

[dantanner]

At -110 you need to win 52.4% to break even. At +110 you need to win 47.6% to break even. If the game is a toss up, which way looks best to you?

I like money line dogs so I can profit even if I end up losing more games than I win. For every +10 you get, that's 2.4% fewer games you need to win to make the dollars.

[onlooker]

Me like underdog money lines, in every sport.

[D3 Mighty Ducks]

Underdog ML yes, favorites? Yes.

[chopperocker]

ATS is more profitable but I prefer to bet on the money line on a team that I know will completely dominate the other team.

bet on road dogs of +3 to +3.5 ATS & Moneyline you can make 20 to 50 units a year on this alone. road dogs of +10 or more vs divisional opponent will cash 2 to 3 moneylines a season for some mad cash. moneyline works well with rescheduled games if you fade the home(or intended) team ie nor(katrina) sdg(wildfires) min(roof collapse) hou(tropical storm) phi(blizzard) these home teams are 1-12 SU 2-9-1 ATS 4-9 O/U only SU winner was 10/02/05 nor -1.5 vs buf