im thinking it could be straight up or maybe bears -1
Comment
Ch3fDan
SBR Sharp
02-02-10
305
#4
I wouldn't think the Bears would be much of a favorite. I was thinking after the game last night that the Packers would come in as favorites but if the Bears roll this one up enough I doubt it.
Comment
broadway6
SBR Posting Legend
11-14-09
13337
#5
bears will be favs, but less than 3.
Comment
LT Profits
SBR Aristocracy
10-27-06
90963
#6
Packers -3, 43.5
Comment
broadway6
SBR Posting Legend
11-14-09
13337
#7
Originally posted by LT Profits
Packers -3, 43.5
seriously?
Comment
LT Profits
SBR Aristocracy
10-27-06
90963
#8
Originally posted by broadway6
seriously?
Yep.
I thought it would be -3,5 or a juiced -3, so -3 at -110 or less could be good value.
Line aside, Packers win by 7+
Comment
jhack704
SBR Hall of Famer
06-04-09
5346
#9
either even or gb will be favored, it was a 1pt line gb vs atl and chi is considered worse than atl and gb is hot and destined to the super bowl, load up on gb now fellas
Comment
t-wizzle
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
12-18-09
38099
#10
Bears -1
Comment
LT Profits
SBR Aristocracy
10-27-06
90963
#11
Guys, I posted the REAL line above. You can stop guessing now.
Comment
BettingWizard
SBR Hall of Famer
11-28-09
6522
#12
no way in hell the packers are -3
Comment
Dexter
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
12-24-08
25829
#13
the line will close around bears -1....total 43 imo
Comment
LT Profits
SBR Aristocracy
10-27-06
90963
#14
Originally posted by BettingWizard
no way in hell the packers are -3
Care to wager 500 points?
LOL
Comment
LT Profits
SBR Aristocracy
10-27-06
90963
#15
Originally posted by Dexter
the line will close around bears -1....total 43 imo
No way Bears become favorites. If anything might go to -3.5.
Comment
BettingWizard
SBR Hall of Famer
11-28-09
6522
#16
Originally posted by LT Profits
Care to wager 500 points?
LOL
yep.
i know the early lines had gb -3, but no way that stays with the bears blowing out seattle too
Comment
LT Profits
SBR Aristocracy
10-27-06
90963
#17
Originally posted by BettingWizard
yep.
i know the early lines had gb -3, but no way that stays with the bears blowing out seattle too
Oh I thought you were disputing current line, so no bet (which I wouldn't have made anyway because line is out )
Bears blowing out Seattle won't change anything, Packers are still the much better team and Chicago was a double-digit favorite today, so blowout has minimal impact.
Comment
HoulihansTX
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
02-12-09
30566
#18
I would take Packers over anyone.
Comment
No coincidences
SBR Aristocracy
01-18-10
76300
#19
Originally posted by HoulihansTX
I would take Packers over anyone.
Only thing that concerns me about GB is their lack of a running game.
It's easy to look invincible when Rodgers is in the comforts of a dome and a ground attack isn't needed.
Comment
Footballtime
SBR MVP
01-20-10
3229
#20
Packers are -3 already out!
Comment
broadway6
SBR Posting Legend
11-14-09
13337
#21
Originally posted by LT Profits
Packers -3, 43.5
sharp post pal
Comment
RAK
SBR High Roller
11-29-10
237
#22
Is it to early to lock in GB -3 (-120)?
Comment
Dexter
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
12-24-08
25829
#23
Originally posted by LT Profits
No way Bears become favorites. If anything might go to -3.5.
i agree...i misread your post and assumed the bears opened -3
Comment
meader99
SBR MVP
10-30-10
4223
#24
My book has Green Bay -3 (-120).
Comment
Dexter
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
12-24-08
25829
#25
Originally posted by No coincidences
Only thing that concerns me about GB is their lack of a running game.
It's easy to look invincible when Rodgers is in the comforts of a dome and a ground attack isn't needed.
i believe in starks.....hes a big time talent and didnt play during the regular season due to a poor work ethic.
hes out of the doghouse now...
Comment
LT Profits
SBR Aristocracy
10-27-06
90963
#26
Originally posted by broadway6
sharp post pal
Not sharp, line was already up.
Comment
meader99
SBR MVP
10-30-10
4223
#27
Starks should be plenty fresh. First 6 weeks on the pup and didn't get his first action until around week 9 and saw limited action after that with a couple of inactives.