Rams @ Seahawks: It Is Simple

[Serbone]

No it isn't.
Seattle QB is game time decision.

1) If Hasselbeck starts and plays adequately, Sea + 3 is the play.
2) The thing is, he might start but not make it very long if he gets hit.
3) If Whitehurst is named the starter, bet Rams - 3, BIG.

SO the only way to go is if # 3 is announced right before the game.
If Hasselbeck starts, you still do not know.

[Serbone]

Word is that Hasselbeck is starting.

[gshock1]

Seahawks are the play

[Serbone]

If Hasselbeck plays well they look good... but I fear he will not be 100%... or get knocked out early.... he hurt his hit running last week, no one touched him... that actually is worse it means something inside popped.
Whitehurst is NOT ready.

[Landscaper]

Played Seattle at +4

[sweethook]

gl/ man

[Serbone]

I'm going with Rams, even if Hasselbeck starts, he is frail, he will not be effective and will be out with the first hit.
Watch out for Rams WR Alexander... bad knee missed most of the season.... got healthy and changes the Rams "O" completely... he is 6'5", fast, lean but incredibly strong... rookie from Missouri, set a ton of records, looked to be 1st round draft choice, but blew out his knee.
Also, TE Hoomanawanui might be ready to play, he is big time player, hobbled all yr with high ankle sprain.
If these two can go, they are significant weapons that have not been available most of the year.
Seahawks allowed 38, 34, 40, 14, 34 last 5 games... 14 was to Carolina.

[Ndoe206]

lol regardless who starts its seahawks +3 even alittle on the ML

[BigWilly]

Not sure where peoplenare getting this bad info but hasslebeck isn't starting, Seattle has been playing so bad i dont see any way they can win this game