Giants @ Eagles...........Who you got and why

[RatMAn2787]

I like Giants moneyline and over 48 1/2.

[ACSeminole]

Giants because im following the win/loss trend and eagles coming off a blowout. Plus NYG looked really good up until last weekend.

Not a big play though because eagles are regular season superstars every year. Its the playoffs where they always come up short and they will again this year. I'm just following a trend. GL

[JoMoney2785]

I understand that the public is in love with the Eagles and Vick right now, and that the giants just lost to the cowboys so that Gmen look like the "right" play, but i wouldnt be surprised at all to see the eagles win this one by a touchdown, they have big play abilities all over the field and I like them at home to win this game. Vick seem to be on top of his game and motivated to win alot of games with this team so i have to take the eagles tonight

[dstewstar]

Giants are now at +4, I think this is a solid play.

[STAY STRONG]

giants is the play

[ebbearsfb1]

any one else not able to buy .5 on the giants game?

[woody78]

G-Men and over for me. Vick is not THAT good and Giants D is one of the better unites as a whole. Their D-Line will not fuk up all night like "The Worm" Haynesworth and his buddies did last week in DC. With it being a short week and everyone deepthroating the Eagles for the past 6 days, this screams NYG. I'll actually be on the ML for a little, especially if the ML odds get any better closer to kickoff.

[uhuhahah]

Vick is too good.

[sweethook]

after reading this id said take home fav. gl.

[BernardMadoff]

4 is a key number too, dont know if its worth buying though

Not worth it in my book, this year so far 32 games have ended in 3 pts opposed to 5 games ending in 4 pts.

[BernardMadoff]

any one else not able to buy .5 on the giants game?

What book are you using?

[masr]

Giants + 3.5 for me

[VBPro7]

Phi 31 nyg 21

[Flight]

Wow, you would think if someone lays $25K on a game, they would at least try to get the best number? +3 +105 ??? +3.5 is available anywhere!

[HauntingTheHoly]

Not worth it in my book, this year so far 32 games have ended in 3 pts opposed to 5 games ending in 4 pts.

where do you quickly acquire this information?

[wildemu]

the eagles defense really isn't that good, as long as the giants can apply pressure on vick, the ml should cash.

I am expecting a shootout though tonight, got over 46 earlier in the weekend.

[kcDdegenerate]

I parlayed Giants +3.5 and over 47.5

[smarsh90]

i think the eagles by at least a td vick is a beast but it should be a good game at least

[JamesBrown]

Took my Dime profit from the Bucs games and rolled on to some NYG +3.5!

[BernardMadoff]

where do you quickly acquire this information?

Went to ESPN starting from week one, only took like 2 minutes to do. Not sure I counted today where 3 games ended in 3pts and 1 ended in 4pts.

[OMGRandyJackson]

On the Eagles -3. Have not decided on a total yet

[Snowball]

you couldn't pay me to take the Giants tonight.

[Margin Walker]

Under 49

[ridims]

Steve Smith, WR Out Nov 17
Comment: Smith (pectoral) has confirmed that he won't play this week or next week

Big loss for the Giants here on offense.

Philly with big momentum and confidence against the Giants who are definately down after a beat down in Dallas last week. I see the G men playing hard and putting up a good fight here..

Not sure if i'm going to bet on this game until half time and then do a 2nd half lay down.

[The fiddler]

One Manning was 4.5 dog. Now the other Manning is 3.5 dog. Backdoor covers are schweeet. But I'm not taking the Giants. Over 24 for the first half for me.

[olemiss33]

Why would you buy up to 4 if youre getting 3.5?

Because the number of games in the NFL over the last 8 years that end on 3 is only 3% more than games than end on 4. I always buy to 4 in that situation. Nothing like losing a 24-20 game, when I could have bought the half and kept my money. I have a rule, and I certainly don't expect everyone to follow the same plan. But, when playing a dog, I always buy this:

3- to 4
6- to 7
9- to 10
12- to 13
13- to 14

Im a $100 unit player. Therefore, @ an additional 10% juice, I only have to have this work in my favor 1 out of every ten plays. I have found it works this way about 1 in 8. Yes, only a slight difference, but still a small advantage.

Plus, I can't stand to lose by 1/2. It eats me worse than anything else in gambling.

[BernardMadoff]

Because the number of games in the NFL over the last 8 years that end on 3 is only 3% more than games than end on 4.

I just dont believe this in fact it cant be true.

[olemiss33]

I just dont believe this in fact it cant be true.

I don't care what you believe, brother. I buy it because this is numbers a guy gave me a few years back that is about a 59% winner over a 5 year span.

[BernardMadoff]

I don't care what you believe, brother. I buy it because this is numbers a guy gave me a few years back that is about a 59% winner over a 5 year span.

You said 8 years at first which is it? Its gonna take me 10 minutes to backtest and prove what I already know.

[dstewstar]

Because the number of games in the NFL over the last 8 years that end on 3 is only 3% more than games than end on 4. I always buy to 4 in that situation. Nothing like losing a 24-20 game, when I could have bought the half and kept my money. I have a rule, and I certainly don't expect everyone to follow the same plan. But, when playing a dog, I always buy this:

3- to 4
6- to 7
9- to 10
12- to 13
13- to 14

Im a $100 unit player. Therefore, @ an additional 10% juice, I only have to have this work in my favor 1 out of every ten plays. I have found it works this way about 1 in 8. Yes, only a slight difference, but still a small advantage.

Plus, I can't stand to lose by 1/2. It eats me worse than anything else in gambling.

Yeah, I see you are putting your bets down on key numbers.

[SpeedPro]

I recall a lot of people saying Eagles defense was no good. They look pretty good to me.

[olemiss33]

You said 8 years at first which is it? Its gonna take me 10 minutes to backtest and prove what I already know.

The trend is 8 years. I have been following him for 5. What part of that is too difficult for you to understand? He told me about it 5 years ago, and the trend, at that time, was 3 years old. There.....I broke it down for you in layman terms.

Either way, that's how I play it. Period. You bet your games, I and will bet mine......and, buy my half point when needed.

[Kav]

FUKK! if he kept his balance that would have been a TD!


anyhow somehow the giants are still in it, one TD to get the cover lol.

[BernardMadoff]

The trend is 8 years. I have been following him for 5. What part of that is too difficult for you to understand? He told me about it 5 years ago, and the trend, at that time, was 3 years old. There.....I broke it down for you in layman terms.

Either way, that's how I play it. Period. You bet your games, I and will bet mine......and, buy my half point when needed.

No prob good luck, was just going against 3 only hitting 3% more than 4 thats all.

[olemiss33]

I agree the Giants are still in it. Hell, the Eagles haven't done a thing offensively. If it weren't for the two turnovers, this would be 3-4 point game right now. I look for Coughlin the make some changes, and the Giants to come out and get going offensively.