As you may have noticed, the forum was offline for a period. We identified a security incident to Sportsbook Review Forum and took the site offline as a containment step while we investigated.
We wanted to make sure the system and site were restored and secured before bringing things back online and you will see that we are requiring all forum users to reset their password as a precautionary step.
If you have any questions, our moderators are around and happy to help where they can.
They win, they get the #3 seed. However, I've seen some articles from national pundits that say they may pull their starters early.
I want to play San Diego but this uncertainty is troubling.
Dark Horse
SBR Posting Legend
12-14-05
13764
#2
They'll only pull starters if the game is in the bag. They'll be watching the Steelers score too. There is no way that the Chargers are going to take the number 3 spot lightly.
Comment
SexyMit
SBR Hall of Famer
10-12-06
6139
#3
All the money is on San Diego... I will be taking Oakland +9
If it seems to good to be true it usually is!!
I have a natural instinct to exploit market ineffieciencies!!
Comment
rousea
SBR Hustler
12-26-07
69
#4
Russell is making his first start and if San Diego plays its starters until it has a big lead, then I see this as a 17-20 point win for the Chargers.
Comment
Dark Horse
SBR Posting Legend
12-14-05
13764
#5
As I mentioned in other thread, OAK is 1-101-1 ATS when they lose SU at home. So good luck with the Raiders...
I don't want to get pulled into week 17 crap, so just messing around. Teasing PHI -1 and WAS -2.5. If PHI covers I'm teasing DAL over two TD's along with SD-2.5.
(FWIW, I didn't check that OAK stat. A friend mentioned it, and I trust his judgement. But I seem to remember that OAK lost to IND recently, at home, and they definitely covered).
Comment
LT Profits
SBR Aristocracy
10-27-06
90963
#6
Dark Horse,
I got 2-84-1 since 1985. Covers were Indy this year and Denver last season.