mannings int was way worse than favres vs saints. favre threw it at the worst time possible but 6 turnovers bs calls and minn still had a shot to win. colts had no other turnovers, no bad calls, or any of the bs vikings had and when it was crunch time manning chocked and chocked worse than favre. manning had a chance to tie the game but threw it away and gave the saints a win. it makes me feel a little better about favres int but makes me wonder if minnesota woulda 2nite and i think they would have, man so close but so far, come back one more yr favre, the 2011 will be a lock out and then you call it quits
-
-
Favre was in a situation where they needed the yardage to get into field goal range, only because of the stupid huddle penalty that pushed them out.
More importantly, Favre was a physical wreck from the pounding, his ankle was very unstable and there's no way he could have ran for that yardage so he had no choice. Not to get into all that..
Favre will be back for one more year, I believe.Comment -
farve's int was easily worse because everyone knows you dont throw back across over the middle.
mannings int was more a bolder play by the cb by jumping the route.Comment -
either way both stupid ass throws but i was just saying teh importance of them and the other things that happened in the game. yes they both sucked and both had a chance to win. but the only bad play in the indy game was by manning that only him cost them the game on that playComment -
Manning's pick sealed the loss. After Favre's, Minnesota still had a chance.Comment -
exactly thak you!Originally posted by KyleG44
and im saying with all the turnovers before favres they could have been up 3 tds. manning had the only turnover and right when porter ran it back you knew it was over right then not like when favre threw his, you still watched cuz it wasnt over
Comment
