One or more things to consider about Superbowl

[PAULYPOKER]

1.The city of New Orleans needs the Revenue from positive publicity more than Indianapolis.
2.The Majority of the world will be rooting hard for the Saints finish of a perfect story of previous tragedy
3.The Saints are being overlooked by the majority of betting public just like the 2007 Giants was.
4.Media already are making pre-excuses for a potential loss for the Colts
5. If you are on the wrong side of the wager in this one you can count it as a loss cause there is no room for error on oddsmakers part of the equation

[jerseykingpin]

[slacker00]

Check out the SBR video about betting props. It's a goldmine, something to consider.

[Darrellp32]

5. If you are on the wrong side of the wager in this one you can count it as a loss cause there is no room for error on oddsmakers part of the equation

now I'm not saying I'm any kind of handcapping genius but this quote needs a big DUH behind it.

[slacker00]

now I'm not saying I'm any kind of handcapping genius but this quote needs a big DUH behind it.

... and when they score a touchdown, they call it a "touchdown" and that's worth six points. Scoring a touchdown is better than not scoring a touchdown. When they score a touchdown then the team has a better chance to win the game becaue the team with the highest score has the best chance to win the game...

[Samhain]

As for the Saints in the same category as the Giants??? Not even close.
All week so far during media day it's been 2:1 Saints. Unlike the Giants (who everyone wrote off), everyone loves the Saints and the story for the city.

You ask people who don't even bet who they like. They'll tell you the Saints.

[thebertshow]

I can think of good reasons to bet on the Saints but none of them are in this thread

[podunk]

colts baby

[msec512]

I'm going with the Saints to cover. Probably won't win but should cover the number.

[Darrellp32]

Now that's funny stuff slacker.

[Superman455]

I am on the Colts. GL with your bets