-
-
Did u listen to the audio cha-chi. 21 point underdog, "nothing to lose". Not applicable to your argument from yesterday. I do appreciate the effort though. Hopefully we can be a lil more civil 2day. I enjoyed the debate, hopefully you did 2. I would have punted, you would have went for it. Agree to disagree I guess.Comment -
I would've gone for it....Comment -
Originally posted by FishFace5
LOL.. From the guy who buys points on and off of 14.
Sorry sir, you aren't a very smart person. You are pretty much useless in any conversation regarding anything about sports betting and probability.Comment -
Says the guy who has never participated in team sports in his life. Your whole argument is based on something a "professor" (who also never played sports) from Berkley came up with. Great study retard. Wonder why it hasn't caught on at any level then??? Maybe because its retarded and not how the game should be played. But u wouldn't know since you've never played any sports.Comment -
It hasn't caught on because precisely of what just took place. Too many retarded fan bases and media types who mercilessly hammer the head coach for making the correct decision.
Pal, you're so clueless its frightening.
If Texas failed to convert that 4th and inches and gave Nebraska the ball in FG range down 3, you would have been screaming your head off like the idiot you are.Comment -
No, not at all. I already responded to that post actually. Very intelligently and respectfully i might add (you could learn from this). I asked you if you listened to the audio??? DID YOU?? Texas was a 21 point HOME dog. The commentator specifically states this. He even adds "they had nothing to lose". Do you really wanna compare this to the New England game. Your really not understanding how every 4th down situation is different and why the stats your using to come up with your probabilities are inaccurate and misleading.Originally posted by SekrahComment
