Call-In Teaser - 4.5pts :D

[Robust]

most books won't let ya buy 4.5 pts, so you gotta call it in.. I teased the sides of matchups this weekend to come up with a WONG. Well.. this is no WONG teaser, but it jumped out at me when i looked at the points needed.

NYG +7.5
TB +7.5
PHI -9.5
ARI +7.5
CHI +7.5

there is no calculator for this anywhere, but I believe it pays around 55/10. Adding another team would rasie the payout to around 90/10, but I can't find another to fit the criteria.

the original lines are from BetPhoenix, so your book might differ by .5 or so..

thoughts? and yes TB is scary as shit, but they are home and Car is not a big deal on the road..

Robust

[Sweatyguido]

watch out on the AZ play. AZ dont run the ball and Seattle has 14 sacks on the year, that means Warner will be pressured early and often. Warners gonna be forced to make plays and in such will make mistakes. on the seattle side, everyone will be behind a rejuvenated matt hasselbeck. its not like AZ's defense is anything special. they give up yds and pts in chunks. i really see seattle, who is so tuff to play at home winning this game by double digits, and shutting down the once powerful AZ offense. Seattles gonna prove why you cant win w/o a solid running attack in this game
Seattle wins 28-13 and easily cover

[Totolover1409]

I like it. BOL

[Robust]

watch out on the AZ play. AZ dont run the ball and Seattle has 14 sacks on the year, that means Warner will be pressured early and often. Warners gonna be forced to make plays and in such will make mistakes. on the seattle side, everyone will be behind a rejuvenated matt hasselbeck. its not like AZ's defense is anything special. they give up yds and pts in chunks. i really see seattle, who is so tuff to play at home winning this game by double digits, and shutting down the once powerful AZ offense. Seattles gonna prove why you cant win w/o a solid running attack in this game
Seattle wins 28-13 and easily cover

very good points there.. might toss it and include Pit -9.5 instead.. ARI was a numbers play and sharp money is on them at +3.. figured +7.5 was better..

gotta think it out

Robust

[ipickwinners]

why do u need to tease the eagles? they will win by 20+..... play them and the giants at +3 in a parlay and ur a winner

fck teasers

[Robust]

why do u need to tease the eagles? they will win by 20+..... play them and the giants at +3 in a parlay and ur a winner

fck teasers

I have NO winning by 3.. lol.. no pushes for me.. and you are right.. I do have PHI blowing out oakland.. but I included them in there because of good 'ol fashioned greed.. LOL

Playing them on the spread in this parlay:

PIT -14 (no palomalu, not included)
WAS -6
PHI -14
and maybe
GB -13

but this one is for another thread

good luck!

Robust

[ipickwinners]

u do know polamalu IS playing this weekend right?

[Robust]

u do know polamalu IS playing this weekend right?

i read on NFL dot com that he practiced.. but the earlier injury report (tuesday) had him listed as questionable.. then i read he would play.. so -14 is a play with him in the lineup..

too many yes/maybe/no's in the mix, so i included that disclaimer in the pick..

good luck!

Robust

[jsmithj88]

steelers dont need troy to whoop the browns
if the stinking bills can hold them to 6 points ................

[Robust]

steelers dont need troy to whoop the browns
if the stinking bills can hold them to 6 points ................

agreed.. but they need him to COVER.. steelers didn't cover against DET last week.. with palomalu, they whoop ass, win, cover, etc..

good luck to you!

Robust