Anybody who thinks Joe Burrow is better than Matthew Stafford right now is crazy

[mikeya2k]

Seriously.

Joe Burrow in his what, 20th game starting ? Is not a better pro quarterback than Matthew Stafford . And it’s not even close .

And Stafford has played worlds better than Burrow this playoff , too. Once again, it’s not even close

Good luck in the super bowl , losers.

[DJK]

Seriously.

Joe Burrow in his what, 20th game starting ? Is not a better pro quarterback than Matthew Stafford . And it’s not even close .

And Stafford has played worlds better than Burrow this playoff , too. Once again, it’s not even close

Good luck in the super bowl , losers.

I can only hope that your thinking is the public thinking and it will end up moving the line back up above -4.5 by the game time.

Right now, it's going down which really concerns me as +4.5 is no longer available anywhere near me in NJ or PA.

I have this thing with what comes up in my head sometimes where I don't listen to them enough. Had I listened to whatever came up in my head all this year, I would have made a fortune.

The latest thing that came up in my head is this.

The books some how know what's going to happen (whether it's because some respected sharps are now unloading on the Bengals or whatever; maybe even Billy Walters) and they are all moving the line in consensus to draw more bets on the Rams.

There is NO WAY IN HELL that people were betting more on the Bengals everywhere today across ALL SPORTSBOOKS and therefore ALL SPORTSBOOKS moved the line down to -4 across the board including the overseas books.

They are begging for more Rams bets knowing the Bengals will cover. That's my two cents. Take it or leave it.

Last night, I was playing $25 minimum blackjack in Bally's casino in Atlantic City. I had $5,000 in chips. A thought came into my head that said to start with $200 bet, but I chickened out and started with only $50. I won the first hand which was a double down but lost the next two, so I went down to $25 minimum bet and stuck with it. I won $650 about 3/4 way into the shoe as I was playing one on one and I NEVER lost more than 2 in a row the whole time. As soon as I lose 2 in a row, I would win the 3rd hand and a few more after that. It was like a dream shoe that you may get once in a year if that.

After the first 3 hands, where I was betting $50 a hand, I was back down to the minimum $25 bet and I ended up winning $650, so that's 26 more wins than losses at $25 bet in only 3/4 way through the shoe.

I won every single double down and just about all splits.

Had I started $200 and stuck with it even after losing the 2nd and 3rd hands, I would have won over $5,200.

Again, I didn't listen to my inner thought and gave up winning additional $4,500+.

[stevenash]

I can make a case for both sides.
Rams money line, or Bengals +4.
Staying away from the sides.

Leaning under 1H, both teams starting out playing it conservative and close to the vest.

I do like the over OBJ receiving yard prop. Stafford has a good rapport with him now.

[budwiser]

About 95% of the football world would take burrow over Stafford

Stafford can throw long but he's prone to ints

[GunShard]

Tom Brady was a +14 underdog against the Rams super bowl and won. Joe Burrow in the same situation as Tom Brady.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_Bowl_XXXVI