Thinking Pack again.

[Snowball]

nothing official yet.

[Snowball]

Raiders are just about out.
2-4 home record.
Pack back in the swing of it.
-3 might hop early before the casuals start buying it.

[Snowball]

Tell you one thing.
Packers won't put up just 4 field goals and nothing else
like Denver did last week.

[WWCD]

Not sure, but I think the Raiders haven't beat GB since I was a kid.

But I don't know what to expect from either team this week.

[Snowball]

grabbing some now.
LM moving.
bought to -2.5

[blackHIPPY]

waiting for oak +3.5

[pimike]

A lot of tangibles with this match up Snowball.

[goldust]

Wouldn't trust GB in this spot. Oakland's feisty, and motivation shouldn't be an issue since they're a young team simply trying to get better every week.

[Snowball]

A lot of tangibles with this match up Snowball.

tangibles are less risky than intangibles.

[pimike]

tangibles are less risky than intangibles.

Lol correct

[JayDr3am]

idk GB has been a lil flimsy. but still somehow getting it done.. kinda leanin cheeseheads here

[WWCD]

84% on GB thus far. I might have to play OAK if it goes to +3.5.

[Snowball]

84% on GB thus far. I might have to play OAK if it goes to +3.5.

Top Consensus:

New England 73%
New York Jets 70%
New Orleans 69%
Green Bay 69%
Arizona 67%
Kansas City 65%

[WWCD]

Top Consensus:

New England 73%
New York Jets 70%
New Orleans 69%
Green Bay 69%
Arizona 67%
Kansas City 65%

Where do they get their numbers from?

The one I use gets their numbers from 7 books:
5Dimes
SportsInteraction
BetUS
CaribSports
Bet DSI
Sportsbook.ag

I wonder if Covers gets theirs from LV books?

[Snowball]

Where do they get their numbers from?

The one I use gets their numbers from 7 books:
5Dimes
SportsInteraction
BetUS
CaribSports
Bet DSI
Sportsbook.ag

I wonder if Covers gets theirs from LV books?

no, but their numbers aren't often dissimilar.
covers has picks from its community which reflect
the bias of regular cappers. anyway i never pay attention
to any consensus data when capping. just the line.
the line is the clearest indication of dollar betting bias.

[pimike]

Books are getting hit via Packers more than any other bet right now.

[goldust]

If Dallas could've thrown the ball at all, they had a chance to win their game in GB. Oakland can win outright...but it's a stayaway IMO.

[Snowball]

Still got this at -2.5 (bought from -3)
the line is -4 as of now.

Raiders backers are looking at Sam Shields out as a reason to take them,
however Green Bay has won 6 straight vs Oakland and is only 1 game up
in the NFC North.
The Pack's young corners will be tested, but by all accounts they are up to
the job. Packer backers don't need Oakland to stay off the board, just need
the offense to score more.
Typically this is where Green Bay holds to form and defends the NFC North rank.

[goldust]

Still got this at -2.5 (bought from -3)
the line is -4 as of now.

Raiders backers are looking at Sam Shields out as a reason to take them,
however Green Bay has won 6 straight vs Oakland and is only 1 game up
in the NFC North.
The Pack's young corners will be tested, but by all accounts they are up to
the job. Packer backers don't need Oakland to stay off the board, just need
the offense to score more.
Typically this is where Green Bay holds to form and defends the NFC North rank.

Not sure why 6 straight matters when they play once every 4 years.

[ByAnYMe9n$]

Carr is going to have a field day may have a problem on the right side of the OL with the rookie Guard getting his first start he looked Solid to me in pre season so I dont think he will be the problem it will be the RT Webb!! DL will have a field day vs GB OL after Aldon being suspended Raiders have moved back to a 4/3 and are putting more pressure on QB's not to mention Mack is now healthy and eatting QB's for Breakfast !! Secondary has been a problem but no one on GB WR core should scare a medicore Secondary that has been playing better since the benching of Hayden!! Not to mention HOF Woodson will have this team Foaming at the mouth for him knowing this was the team that got rid of him !!
Raiders +4 for me and ML

[johnnyvegas13]

id say pack is the right side

[Snowball]

Not sure why 6 straight matters when they play once every 4 years.

things happen in 7's.

[YOUNGBUCK]

Useless trends that mean nothing snowy

[goduke]

green bay can lose the next two games and still win the division against minny week 17 so this game isnt as relevant as you think

[Snowball]

green bay can lose the next two games and still win the division against minny week 17 so this game isnt as relevant as you think

There is still a decent 2-seed BYE possibility for Green Bay.

[Snowball]

Useless trends that mean nothing snowy

I agree but he asked.

Whatever, I'll fade the Raiders and take the team that has a habit of getting it done.
GL

[Snowball]

[JayDr3am]

[Jeep_Life 42]

Nice hit!