3 Game Parlay - Which game do you think loses?

ezeblazin · 10-06-15, 05:45 PM

I like 1 and 2, but I think Oakland has a pretty solid chance to beat Denver.

rpesi9955 · 10-06-15, 07:15 PM

You got 3 winners there pal.

PUBABEAR1 · 10-06-15, 07:34 PM

I don't trust Chicago. A couple turnovers and a kick off return and the game could get well out of hand. Kc has been moving the ball well just have not got in the end zone. 15 is a lot of points..gl

JayDr3am · 10-06-15, 08:15 PM

Originally posted by WWCD

Actually it's a Teaser.

[ATTACH]85501[/ATTACH]

Just wanted to hear some SBR opinions.

these look good man. the fact that the Denver game is at Pk is great. bears defense should keep them in the game w.o a doubt.

I like

POOLSIDE · 10-06-15, 08:38 PM

Raiders could surprise you here. So could Kansas City.

I like this teaser better

Falcons -1
Saints +11.5
Packers -3

rpesi9955 · 10-06-15, 08:53 PM

Good luck to alL.

House · 10-06-15, 08:54 PM

KC is gonna cover this week

WWCD · 10-06-15, 09:05 PM

Originally posted by POOLSIDE

Raiders could surprise you here. So could Kansas City.

I like this teaser better

Falcons -1
Saints +11.5
Packers -3

I explained some of my reasoning on KC and OAK earlier today in your thread.

If the Raiders pull an upset, it will be all on emotion and Carr. The ball will need to bounce their way more than a few times for it to happen. The 2 main points about this game is the soft Raider defense vs. solid Denver defense, and the fact that Manning hasn't lost to the Raiders since 2001 when he was 25 years old.

KC has not beat anyone but the Texans and CHI has lost to 3 good teams. Just don't see KC blowing anyone out. If KC wins, it won't be by much IMO.

Your teaser looks good. Maybe I play that too.

WWCD · 10-06-15, 09:06 PM

Originally posted by House

KC is gonna cover this week

Cover 10 or 15?

JayDr3am · 10-06-15, 09:32 PM

Originally posted by WWCD

I explained some of my reasoning on KC and OAK earlier today in your thread.

If the Raiders pull an upset, it will be all on emotion and Carr. The ball will need to bounce their way more than a few times for it to happen. The 2 main points about this game is the soft Raider defense vs. solid Denver defense, and the fact that Manning hasn't lost to the Raiders since 2001 when he was 25 years old.

KC has not beat anyone but the Texans and CHI has lost to 3 good teams. Just don't see KC blowing anyone out. If KC wins, it won't be by much IMO.

Your teaser looks good. Maybe I play that too.

those look glorious, I never really mess with the teasers.. I may give it a SMALL shot lol

WWCD · 10-06-15, 11:01 PM

I hear you.

I generally focus on straight bets, but for whatever reason this season I have been hitting parlays and teasers.. so I'm focusing a little more on them.

I know they are not good over the long run, but having fun with it for now.

May swap out CHI and go with PIT +7.5
Extra time to prepare. SD no pass rush and allow more yards on the ground than the entire NFL. Pitt pounds the rock with Bell, and Vick should have room to throw to all of those weapons when needed. Bryant back for Pitt should be helpful.

Gates does come back for SD, and Rivers can sling the rock.. but I am really leaning Pitt with the +7.5

JayDr3am · 10-07-15, 01:32 AM

Originally posted by WWCD

I hear you.

I generally focus on straight bets, but for whatever reason this season I have been hitting parlays and teasers.. so I'm focusing a little more on them.

I know they are not good over the long run, but having fun with it for now.

May swap out CHI and go with PIT +7.5
Extra time to prepare. SD no pass rush and allow more yards on the ground than the entire NFL. Pitt pounds the rock with Bell, and Vick should have room to throw to all of those weapons when needed. Bryant back for Pitt should be helpful.

Gates does come back for SD, and Rivers can sling the rock.. but I am really leaning Pitt with the +7.5

yeah I didn't know MUCH about it till a year ish ago.. so I just stayed away from'em. I'm a little bit more knowledgeable of it and can see how its effective.

Pitt +7.5 is good, call me crazy.. but I can see Pitt winnin outright. yes even with vick in. if Antonio didn't barely drop that bomb from vick last thurday we got a different ball you know what I'm sayin? so vick can still be a threat and worry some folk..

POOLSIDE · 10-07-15, 01:56 AM

Here's my thing about the Denver game. Basically what you just said about Kansas City, apply it to Denver. They're 4-0, but the combined record of the four teams they've beaten is 4-12. Their four wins consist of the following. A narrow home win over Baltimore, where Baltimore dropped a touchdown in the endzone in the final seconds. A weird last minute fumble victory over Kansas City, where they trailed most of the game. A very underwhelming victory over the listless Lions. A narrow home victory over Minnesota, a game where the Vikings were driving late with the chance to tie/win.

Oakland meanwhile is difficult to get a read on. They're so young and so talented and they're playing with the house's money. No one is expecting anything from them, yet here they are a last second fg away from being 3-1. I see them taking this game much more personally than Denver can. What that'll ultimately mean, I have no clue. As a lifelong Raiders fan, I wouldn't be surprised if they man up and play a phenomenal football game and win the thing outright (in which case they'll be an autofade in week six) or if reality sets in, Manning finds his zone and the game looks similar to Cincy in week one.

Montana77 · 10-07-15, 02:53 AM

Originally posted by POOLSIDE

Here's my thing about the Denver game. Basically what you just said about Kansas City, apply it to Denver. They're 4-0, but the combined record of the four teams they've beaten is 4-12. Their four wins consist of the following. A narrow home win over Baltimore, where Baltimore dropped a touchdown in the endzone in the final seconds. A weird last minute fumble victory over Kansas City, a game where they trailed most of the game. A very underwhelming victory over the listless Lions. A narrow victory over Minnesota, a game where the Vikings were driving late with the chance to tie/win.

Oakland meanwhile is difficult to get a read on. They're so young and so talented and they're playing with the house's money. No one is expecting anything from them, yet here they are a last second fg away from being 3-1. I see them taking this game much more personally than Denver can. What that'll ultimately mean, I have no clue. As a lifelong Raiders fan, I wouldn't be surprised if they man up and play a phenomenal football game and win the game (in which case they'll be an autofade in week six) of if reality sets in, Manning finds his zone and the game looks similar to Cincy in week one.

House · 10-07-15, 08:11 AM

Originally posted by WWCD

Cover 10 or 15?

I think they cover 10 , 15 maybe ..... this could be a blowout for KC ... could be a 31-10 kinda game

WWCD · 10-07-15, 09:58 AM

Originally posted by POOLSIDE

Here's my thing about the Denver game. Basically what you just said about Kansas City, apply it to Denver. They're 4-0, but the combined record of the four teams they've beaten is 4-12. Their four wins consist of the following. A narrow home win over Baltimore, where Baltimore dropped a touchdown in the endzone in the final seconds. A weird last minute fumble victory over Kansas City, a game where they trailed most of the game. A very underwhelming victory over the listless Lions. A narrow victory over Minnesota, a game where the Vikings were driving late with the chance to tie/win.

Oakland meanwhile is difficult to get a read on. They're so young and so talented and they're playing with the house's money. No one is expecting anything from them, yet here they are a last second fg away from being 3-1. I see them taking this game much more personally than Denver can. What that'll ultimately mean, I have no clue. As a lifelong Raiders fan, I wouldn't be surprised if they man up and play a phenomenal football game and win the game (in which case they'll be an autofade in week six) of if reality sets in, Manning finds his zone and the game looks similar to Cincy in week one.

As a fellow Raider fan, I want to believe that we can pull it off. But I just don't. They will have to show me before I put trust them. That being said, it does seem like everytime I bet against them I lose LOL.

blackHIPPY · 10-07-15, 10:09 AM

all 3 lose imo

WWCD · 10-07-15, 10:42 AM

Originally posted by blackHIPPY

all 3 lose imo

Play it the other way and let me know how you do sir.

POOLSIDE · 10-07-15, 10:50 AM

Originally posted by WWCD

As a fellow Raider fan, I want to believe that we can pull it off. But I just don't. They will have to show me before I put I trust them. That being said, it does seem like everytime I bet against them I lose LOL.

Then put a dollar on Denver, please.

WWCD · 10-07-15, 11:13 AM

Week 1 - Took Raiders
Week 2 - Took Ravens
Week 3 - Took Browns
Week 4 - Took Raiders

POOLSIDE · 10-07-15, 11:18 AM

Stop taking the Raiders. You're killing me.

WWCD · 10-07-15, 11:20 AM

HAHAHA. I would be against us EVERY game if it guaranteed a win!

NardVa · 10-07-15, 11:21 AM

Bears may get blown out and Denver might lose.

GmenYanksNJ · 10-07-15, 01:01 PM

Just put in 4 team teaser 6.5 104 w 260

Balt Cleve under 50
Ne -2.5
Nyg -.5
Utah -.5 Sat night

Thoughts?

WWCD · 10-07-15, 01:24 PM

Like NE and NYG.

Not sure on BAL/CLE, both have issues on defense. I don't watch enough college ball to give input on Utah. (last week I took Bama though, just cause most of SBR said they would get smashed)

GmenYanksNJ · 10-07-15, 02:07 PM

was on bama too I like afc north unders as they are usually pretty smash mouth time consuming games, hopefully that continues this week. Hoping the ravens d wakes up and holds Cleveland. That is my least favorite leg but still like the value

WWCD · 10-12-15, 11:59 PM

Should have just parlayed all of it damn!