ESPN reporting public cleaned up today

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Brian891
    SBR MVP
    • 04-28-10
    • 2049

    #1
    ESPN reporting public cleaned up today
    biggest two bets on green bay and miami. Sharps had most money on rams.
    interesting reading: Vegas books suffer 'horrible' opening NFL Sunday
  • RRNJ13
    SBR Sharp
    • 09-03-14
    • 282

    #2
    Originally posted by Brian891
    biggest two bets on green bay and miami. Sharps had most money on rams.
    interesting reading: Vegas books suffer 'horrible' opening NFL Sunday
    Had to be a ton of over money Sunday night as well seems like everyone liked over
    Comment
    • jaxjonesdrew32
      SBR Sharp
      • 04-02-10
      • 330

      #3
      Fade the public next Sunday
      Comment
      • recon1
        SBR MVP
        • 08-13-12
        • 2579

        #4
        Lookout for the yellow flags next week. Vegas in partnership with the NFL is not gonna leave billions of dollars up for chance.
        Comment
        • Isaiah
          SBR MVP
          • 11-06-12
          • 1013

          #5
          Originally posted by recon1
          Lookout for the yellow flags next week. Vegas in partnership with the NFL is not gonna leave billions of dollars up for chance.
          You have got to be the stupidest poster on SBR.
          Comment
          • Brian891
            SBR MVP
            • 04-28-10
            • 2049

            #6
            think the article was posted before the over but definitely. im assuming vegas got some back on giants cover. so many favs rolled today. But my boys in buffalo handled their underdog business!!! one of 5 best atmospheres ive seen at the ralph since i got my season tix at 16 in 2001.
            Comment
            • Renegades
              SBR Hall of Famer
              • 10-12-11
              • 5290

              #7
              No doubt public cleaned up. Chicago outplayed GB and should have covered but then again, they have Jay Cutler! Why was the miami line so low? I dont get it. If 80-85% of the bets are coming in on one side, that's a problem. How about cincy? -3?! -3 over one of the worst teams in the league.
              Comment
              • thebestthereis
                SBR Posting Legend
                • 03-01-09
                • 11459

                #8
                Originally posted by Renegades
                No doubt public cleaned up. Chicago outplayed GB and should have covered but then again, they have Jay Cutler! Why was the miami line so low? I dont get it. If 80-85% of the bets are coming in on one side, that's a problem. How about cincy? -3?! -3 over one of the worst teams in the league.
                The Miami line was so low because the sportsbooks did not move it based on action and took a position on Washington. Just like the Bears the Skins should of covered and or won, I watched the entire game. At the end of the first half Skins had no clue how to manage the clock. They will play well and still lose because they cannot do the little things winning teams do to win.
                Comment
                • recon1
                  SBR MVP
                  • 08-13-12
                  • 2579

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Isaiah
                  You have got to be the stupidest poster on SBR.
                  Really? you make blank statements calling people "Stupid" but offer no proof of your assumption?

                  Fixes don't happen? what are you 15 Y/O?

                  <iframe width="420" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/cVtlJgt_8FY" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

                  Pitt was -3 in that game.

                  Now go away little one
                  Comment
                  Search
                  Collapse
                  SBR Contests
                  Collapse
                  Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                  Collapse
                  Working...