*Not Seattle Superbowl winner (-240)

[Snowball]

Is it me or is this line somewhat cheap ?
Seattle would have to
a) beat Carolina (ok, that's not worth a lot)
b) beat Dallas or Green Bay (no gimme)
c) repeat to beat AFC opponent

is Seattle really that dominant ?
is Seattle really that much better than the competition ?
consider the next highest odd is *Not Patriots @ -405, then
*Not Denver @ -700.

I just don't see it.
Already on Not Seattle for NFC, covered by Not for Superbowl..
but thinking of going muscular on this.

[Snowball]

ADD:

Dallas beats Seattle* +876

[Big Bear]

They only have to win 3 games.

Seattle rarely ever loses at home.

And they match up well vs both New England and Denver.

Its a pass happy league and Seattle is the hardest team to pass against in the NFL by a country mile.

[Snowball]

They only have to win 3 games.

Seattle rarely ever loses at home.

And they match up well vs both New England and Denver.

Its a pass happy league and Seattle is the hardest team to pass against in the NFL by a country mile.

17 yards per game is a "country mile" ? That's how much they lead KC by in pass yards allowed per game.
The top pass defenses after Seattle are KC, Buffalo, Chargers, Niners, Dolphins, Vikings, and Browns.
None of them made the postseason. One may also argue that their schedule was soft. Only what, maybe
3 times did they face a strong passing game ?

[ilovelady]

ADD:

Dallas beats Seattle* +876

wow people are falling for the dallas hype