A Prop that should hit barring a trade that has plus odds
Watkins over 4.5 is a nice bet to win good money as long as no1 trades a top 4 pick
putting 100 on it to wins 230
survive
SBR MVP
01-08-11
2388
#2
Solid value for sure. Basically just have to dodge jags IMO. I don't see Cleveland taking him
Comment
MoneylineExpress
SBR MVP
04-18-11
1439
#3
He's going 3,4,or 5 IMO.
Comment
bob6199
SBR MVP
02-10-14
1609
#4
Originally posted by survive
Solid value for sure. Basically just have to dodge jags IMO. I don't see Cleveland taking him
yea, but they should pick Mack if they pick Watkins they are penetrating stupid. Seems like they like Evans more and if they pick Evans at 3 ATL will trade up to 4 and pick Mack. Only things that concern me is a team trades to 2 and picks mack leavings evans to go to the jags at 3 and Watkins at 4.
Comment
survive
SBR MVP
01-08-11
2388
#5
Originally posted by bob6199
yea, but they should pick Mack if they pick Watkins they are penetrating stupid. Seems like they like Evans more and if they pick Evans at 3 ATL will trade up to 4 and pick Mack. Only things that concern me is a team trades to 2 and picks mack leavings evans to go to the jags at 3 and Watkins at 4.
Why would the jags be stupid to take Watkins? They don't have a #1. That being said I think they do take Mack. I would be scared of someone like Detroit trading up to 4
Comment
bob6199
SBR MVP
02-10-14
1609
#6
Originally posted by survive
Why would the jags be stupid to take Watkins? They don't have a #1. That being said I think they do take Mack. I would be scared of someone like Detroit trading up to 4
Jags already have small fast WR"s in Shorts, Sanders, and Blackmon. The need a big boy WR who can go out and catch balls not another small guy. DET won't trade to 4 they don't have enough ammo to trade to 4 and they realize the value at 10. Lions won't be the team that trades up to 4, maybe like 5 because the raiders would have a way lower asking price then the browns will
Comment
survive
SBR MVP
01-08-11
2388
#7
Originally posted by bob6199
Jags already have small fast WR"s in Shorts, Sanders, and Blackmon. The need a big boy WR who can go out and catch balls not another small guy. DET won't trade to 4 they don't have enough ammo to trade to 4 and they realize the value at 10. Lions won't be the team that trades up to 4, maybe like 5 because the raiders would have a way lower asking price then the browns will
Blackmon? Haha...he's far from a penciled in starter at this point. Shorts and sanders are obviously WR 2/3. Watkins is a big boy WR "who can go out and catch balls"..he wouldn't be a consensus top 5 talent if he wasn't
Comment
bob6199
SBR MVP
02-10-14
1609
#8
Originally posted by survive
Blackmon? Haha...he's far from a penciled in starter at this point. Shorts and sanders are obviously WR 2/3. Watkins is a big boy WR "who can go out and catch balls"..he wouldn't be a consensus top 5 talent if he wasn't
he is a top 5 player because he is fast and runs good routes, he isn't what Mike Evans is and Blackmon will start when he is back, have fun having small WR's every1 when playing a team like Seattle...
Comment
bob6199
SBR MVP
02-10-14
1609
#9
dammit Bills are penetrating stupid way to give up a 1st round pick for another small fast play maker WR that will really help....
Comment
survive
SBR MVP
01-08-11
2388
#10
Jacksonville just bombed my bortles over...idiots
Comment
bob6199
SBR MVP
02-10-14
1609
#11
bills GM and jags GM gonna be fired within 3 years book it.