Take DEN -5.5 and SF +3.5!!!

[dnwjdl]

Thank me later!

[slacker00]

No write up?

[dnwjdl]

No write up?

I seldom go against stats or trends. For instance, I would never bet on GB against SF. SF owns GB. However, this time around I'm going against the numbers and stats. Sportsbetting is often counter-intuitive. When it is quite obvious to take one side, the chances are the other side is right. I like DEN to win at least by a touchdown, and SF to keep the game close within a field goal and possible win the game SU.

[ZP3]

Both losers. Pats and Hawks for me please

[Barnes & Whine]

counter-intuitive..I like that.

[slacker00]

I seldom go against stats or trends. For instance, I would never bet on GB against SF. SF owns GB. However, this time around I'm going against the numbers and stats. Sportsbetting is often counter-intuitive. When it is quite obvious to take one side, the chances are the other side is right. I like DEN to win at least by a touchdown, and SF to keep the game close within a field goal and possible win the game SU.

So, you are betting GB?

[Yuuuup11]

more the like other way around Pats +4.5 and Sea -3. Thank me later or just flip a coin

[fballgenius]

I like your counter-intuitive theory.

[dnwjdl]

So, you are betting GB?

If the counter intuitive theory worked every time, we would all be millionaires. I think it will work this weekend tho.

[dnwjdl]

I like your counter-intuitive theory.

Thx!

[Trmeyer]

SF cant seem to ever score at Seattle. I like the under in this game more than anything

[DALLASROB]

Thank me later!

Already did

[DALLASROB]

Den by 10+ in a shootout. Last second field goal wins the other game.

[dnwjdl]

Den by 10+ in a shootout. Last second field goal wins the other game.

Great minds think alike. Let's get this sh*t!

[ebelisle22]

0-2

[dnwjdl]

0-2

[dnwjdl]

0-2

0-2 huh?

[dnwjdl]

One down, one to go!