The referee in the Steelers-Ravens game admitted after the game he blew the explanation of the TD reversal, but stands by the decision. Walt Coleman said he should have said "the ball crossed the goal line upon the reception" and not just that the "receiver had two feet in the end zone."
I thought that original explanation meant the TD was good with two feet in the end zone, and that's also why the announcers didn't challenge the play. They wern't sure of the rule.
Hearing that, no way that play should have been reversed. Credit to the posters who knew the rule 100 percent. I was wrong, but the explanation was terrible and that caused the confusion.
I thought that original explanation meant the TD was good with two feet in the end zone, and that's also why the announcers didn't challenge the play. They wern't sure of the rule.
Hearing that, no way that play should have been reversed. Credit to the posters who knew the rule 100 percent. I was wrong, but the explanation was terrible and that caused the confusion.