As you may have noticed, the forum was offline for a period. We identified a security incident to Sportsbook Review Forum and took the site offline as a containment step while we investigated.
We wanted to make sure the system and site were restored and secured before bringing things back online and you will see that we are requiring all forum users to reset their password as a precautionary step.
If you have any questions, our moderators are around and happy to help where they can.
They are going to kick a FG on the KC 25 yard line, then they muff the snap and KC returns it 60+ yards for a TD
Comment
JRS21386
Restricted User
04-13-08
2213
#4
Sounds like the Raiders to me...
Comment
unit1884
SBR Wise Guy
06-11-08
938
#5
Yup, once again there in KC territory and go for it on 4th and 3, instead of kicking the FG (incomplete pass)
Comment
demize21
SBR MVP
11-03-08
3541
#6
lol good old raiders now my cincy ML play is looking great
Comment
JRS21386
Restricted User
04-13-08
2213
#7
Al Davis needs to sell
Comment
Rixsaw
SBR MVP
10-23-08
4532
#8
Al Davis always sale the game to the highest bidder. That's why he would not allow the head coach complete control of the team.
Comment
JRS21386
Restricted User
04-13-08
2213
#9
Thats true.. I agree
Comment
The_Kid
SBR Hall of Famer
02-09-08
5049
#10
Are the Raiders going to be favored in the 2H? If they are, I'm taking KC.
Comment
Seattle Slew
SBR Hall of Famer
01-02-06
7375
#11
It was worse than that. It was a fake. The holder took the snap, and snapped the ball between his legs to Janakowski, who muffed it and the Chiefs ran it back for a TD. Even is Janakowski made the catch, he would have been tackled for a loss. It was 4th and 10.
Raiders would have gone up 6-3 against a terrible Chiefs offense. That play basically gave them the lead and momentum.
Originally posted by unit1884
They are going to kick a FG on the KC 25 yard line, then they muff the snap and KC returns it 60+ yards for a TD
Comment
Skanless1
SBR Wise Guy
11-15-08
706
#12
i wonder what the raiders will be ranked in the new bcs standings?? below Univ. of Wash?
Comment
VegasDave
SBR Hall of Famer
01-03-07
8056
#13
Originally posted by Seattle Slew
It was worse than that. It was a fake. The holder took the snap, and snapped the ball between his legs to Janakowski, who muffed it and the Chiefs ran it back for a TD. Even is Janakowski made the catch, he would have been tackled for a loss. It was 4th and 10.
Raiders would have gone up 6-3 against a terrible Chiefs offense. That play basically gave them the lead and momentum.
Exactly.
Muffed snap would have been acceptable, mistakes happen.
Calling a fake FG on 4th and 10, at home, against a team that you are capable of beating, early in the game, instead of taking the 6 - 3 lead?
I've been a Raiders fan all my life and have seen plenty of stupid shit, but I hadn't been that furious since the tuck rule.
Comment
Seattle Slew
SBR Hall of Famer
01-02-06
7375
#14
How about the next trip, chance to kick a 40-yard FG to make it 10-6 and they go for the end zone.
I had the Chiefs, and the Raiders gave this game away.
Comment
Skanless1
SBR Wise Guy
11-15-08
706
#15
It pains me to say it because i'm from the Bay Area, but the Raiders are a complete joke and will continue to be until Al is 6ft deep.
Comment
unit1884
SBR Wise Guy
06-11-08
938
#16
LOL, I didnt watch the game on CBS sportsline it just said muffed snap...??
Either way, AHHAHAHA The Raiders are sad.
Comment
Skanless1
SBR Wise Guy
11-15-08
706
#17
did anyone see their 70 yard FG attempt a couple weeks ago?